Deniz A. Gürsel1, Lena Reinholz1, Benno Bremer1, Benita Schmitz-Koep1, Nicolai Franzmeier1, Mihai Avram1, Kathrin Koch1. 1. From the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Abstract
Background: Resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) studies commonly report alterations in 3 core networks in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) — the frontoparietal network, the default mode network and the salience network — defined by functionally connected infraslow oscillations in ongoing brain activity. However, most of these studies observed static functional connectivity in the brains of patients with OCD. Methods: To investigate dynamic functional connectivity alterations and widen the evidence base toward the triple network model in OCD, we performed group-based independent component and sliding time window analyses in 49 patients with OCD and 41 healthy controls. Results: The traditional independent component analysis showed alterations in the left frontoparietal network as well as between the left and right frontoparietal networks in patients with OCD compared with healthy controls. For dynamic functional connectivity, the sliding time window approach revealed peak dysconnectivity between the left and right frontoparietal networks and between the left frontoparietal network and the salience network. Limitations: The number of independent components, noise in the resting-state fMRI images, the heterogeneity of the OCD sample, and comorbidities and medication status in the patients could have biased the results. Conclusion: Disrupted modulation of these intrinsic brain networks may contribute to the pathophysiology of OCD.
Background: Resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) studies commonly report alterations in 3 core networks in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) — the frontoparietal network, the default mode network and the salience network — defined by functionally connected infraslow oscillations in ongoing brain activity. However, most of these studies observed static functional connectivity in the brains of patients with OCD. Methods: To investigate dynamic functional connectivity alterations and widen the evidence base toward the triple network model in OCD, we performed group-based independent component and sliding time window analyses in 49 patients with OCD and 41 healthy controls. Results: The traditional independent component analysis showed alterations in the left frontoparietal network as well as between the left and right frontoparietal networks in patients with OCD compared with healthy controls. For dynamic functional connectivity, the sliding time window approach revealed peak dysconnectivity between the left and right frontoparietal networks and between the left frontoparietal network and the salience network. Limitations: The number of independent components, noise in the resting-state fMRI images, the heterogeneity of the OCD sample, and comorbidities and medication status in the patients could have biased the results. Conclusion: Disrupted modulation of these intrinsic brain networks may contribute to the pathophysiology of OCD.
Authors: Patricia Gruner; An Vo; Miklos Argyelan; Toshikazu Ikuta; Andrew J Degnan; Majnu John; Bart D Peters; Anil K Malhotra; Aziz M Uluğ; Philip R Szeszko Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Kate Dimond Fitzgerald; Robert C Welsh; Emily R Stern; Mike Angstadt; Gregory L Hanna; James L Abelson; Stephan F Taylor Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-07-31 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Ben J Harrison; Jesus Pujol; Narcis Cardoner; Joan Deus; Pino Alonso; Marina López-Solà; Oren Contreras-Rodríguez; Eva Real; Cinto Segalàs; Laura Blanco-Hinojo; José M Menchon; Carles Soriano-Mas Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Alexander Mark Weber; Noam Soreni; Michael David Noseworthy Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Edna B Foa; Jonathan D Huppert; Susanne Leiberg; Robert Langner; Rafael Kichic; Greg Hajcak; Paul M Salkovskis Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2002-12
Authors: Elena A Allen; Eswar Damaraju; Sergey M Plis; Erik B Erhardt; Tom Eichele; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Chao Zhang; Yingying Xia; Tao Feng; Ke Yu; Haiyan Zhang; Muhammad Umair Sami; Jie Xiang; Kai Xu Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.677