BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which eosinophil infiltration leads to esophageal remodeling and stricturing, with dilation therapy often needed. Achieving histologic remission reduces the need for repeat dilation, although little is known about the effects of long-term maintenance therapy. AIMS: To further assess the relationship between short-term histologic remission and maintenance therapy on need for repeat dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS: A total of 77 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (59.7% male; mean age 41.6 years) seen at a single medical center from June 2000 to August 2017 were included. Information on history of dilation and therapy [proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), steroids, elimination diet] was collected. Mean follow-up was 164 weeks. Fifty-one patients achieved histologic remission and 42 of these remained on maintenance therapy (23 PPIs, 14 topical steroids, and 5 dietary therapy). Standard phone interview was completed in cases with lack of follow-up. Only patients who underwent esophageal dilation to ≥ 17 mm were included. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients on maintenance therapy required repeat dilation (12/42) compared with patients not on maintenance therapy (8/9) (hazard ratio 0.12; p < 0.001). Of patients who received maintenance therapy, 9.1% required re-dilation. The difference in need for repeat dilation in patients who achieved histologic remission on therapy (14/26) versus those who did not (20/51) was not significant (hazard ratio 1.34; p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: In a retrospective analysis of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, we found that a significantly lower proportion who received maintenance therapy (PPIs, steroids, or dietary exclusions) required repeat dilation.
BACKGROUND:Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which eosinophil infiltration leads to esophageal remodeling and stricturing, with dilation therapy often needed. Achieving histologic remission reduces the need for repeat dilation, although little is known about the effects of long-term maintenance therapy. AIMS: To further assess the relationship between short-term histologic remission and maintenance therapy on need for repeat dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS: A total of 77 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (59.7% male; mean age 41.6 years) seen at a single medical center from June 2000 to August 2017 were included. Information on history of dilation and therapy [proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), steroids, elimination diet] was collected. Mean follow-up was 164 weeks. Fifty-one patients achieved histologic remission and 42 of these remained on maintenance therapy (23 PPIs, 14 topical steroids, and 5 dietary therapy). Standard phone interview was completed in cases with lack of follow-up. Only patients who underwent esophageal dilation to ≥ 17 mm were included. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients on maintenance therapy required repeat dilation (12/42) compared with patients not on maintenance therapy (8/9) (hazard ratio 0.12; p < 0.001). Of patients who received maintenance therapy, 9.1% required re-dilation. The difference in need for repeat dilation in patients who achieved histologic remission on therapy (14/26) versus those who did not (20/51) was not significant (hazard ratio 1.34; p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: In a retrospective analysis of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, we found that a significantly lower proportion who received maintenance therapy (PPIs, steroids, or dietary exclusions) required repeat dilation.
Authors: Thomas Greuter; Christian Bussmann; Ekaterina Safroneeva; Alain M Schoepfer; Luc Biedermann; Stephan R Vavricka; Alex Straumann Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Thomas M Runge; Swathi Eluri; Cary C Cotton; Caitlin M Burk; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Wood B Gibbs; Tara C Rubinas; Karen J Fritchie; Ryan D Madanick; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Thomas Greuter; Ekaterina Safroneeva; Christian Bussmann; Luc Biedermann; Stephan R Vavricka; David A Katzka; Alain M Schoepfer; Alex Straumann Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Anjan Dhar; Hasan N Haboubi; Stephen E Attwood; Marcus K H Auth; Jason M Dunn; Rami Sweis; Danielle Morris; Jenny Epstein; Marco R Novelli; Hannah Hunter; Amanda Cordell; Sharon Hall; Jamal O Hayat; Kapil Kapur; Andrew Robert Moore; Carol Read; Sarmed S Sami; Paul J Turner; Nigel J Trudgill Journal: Gut Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 31.793
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Paneez Khoury; Amanda B Muir; Chris A Liacouras; Ekaterina Safroneeva; Dan Atkins; Margaret H Collins; Nirmala Gonsalves; Gary W Falk; Jonathan M Spergel; Ikuo Hirano; Mirna Chehade; Alain M Schoepfer; Calies Menard-Katcher; David A Katzka; Peter A Bonis; Albert J Bredenoord; Bob Geng; Elizabeth T Jensen; Robert D Pesek; Paul Feuerstadt; Sandeep K Gupta; Alfredo J Lucendo; Robert M Genta; Girish Hiremath; Emily C McGowan; Fouad J Moawad; Kathryn A Peterson; Marc E Rothenberg; Alex Straumann; Glenn T Furuta; Seema S Aceves Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 14.290
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Paneez Khoury; Amanda B Muir; Chris A Liacouras; Ekaterina Safroneeva; Dan Atkins; Margaret H Collins; Nirmala Gonsalves; Gary W Falk; Jonathan M Spergel; Ikuo Hirano; Mirna Chehade; Alain M Schoepfer; Calies Menard-Katcher; David A Katzka; Peter A Bonis; Albert J Bredenoord; Bob Geng; Elizabeth T Jensen; Robert D Pesek; Paul Feuerstadt; Sandeep K Gupta; Alfredo J Lucendo; Robert M Genta; Girish Hiremath; Emily C McGowan; Fouad J Moawad; Kathryn A Peterson; Marc E Rothenberg; Alex Straumann; Glenn T Furuta; Seema S Aceves Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 33.883
Authors: David Miller; Sheena Mago; John W Birk; Evan S Dellon; Paul J Feustel; Micheal Tadros Journal: Esophagus Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 4.230