Literature DB >> 32166581

Image quality analysis of 44Sc on two preclinical PET scanners: a comparison to 68Ga.

Florian Rosar1,2, Hans-Georg Buchholz3, Sebastian Michels3, Manuela A Hoffmann3, Markus Piel4, Christopher M Waldmann3, Frank Rösch4, Stefan Reuss3, Mathias Schreckenberger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 44Sc has been increasingly investigated as a potential alternative to 68Ga in the development of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET). The lower mean positron energy of 44Sc (0.63 MeV) compared to 68Ga (0.83 MeV) can result in better spatial image resolutions. However, high-energy γ-rays (1157 keV) are emitted at high rates (99.9%) during 44Sc decay, which can reduce image quality. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these physical properties and performed an unbiased performance evaluation of 44Sc and 68Ga with different imaging phantoms (image quality phantom, Derenzo phantom, and three-rod phantom) on two preclinical PET scanners (Mediso nanoScan PET/MRI, Siemens microPET Focus 120).
RESULTS: Despite the presence of high-energy γ-rays in 44Sc decay, a higher image resolution of small structures was observed with 44Sc when compared to 68Ga. Structures as small as 1.3 mm using the Mediso system, and as small as 1.0 mm using the Siemens system, could be visualized and analyzed by calculating full width at half maximum. Full widths at half maxima were similar for both isotopes. For image quality comparison, we calculated recovery coefficients in 1-5 mm rods and spillover ratios in either air, water, or bone-equivalent material (Teflon). Recovery coefficients for 44Sc were significantly higher than those for 68Ga. Despite the lower positron energy, 44Sc-derived spillover ratio (SOR) values were similar or slightly higher to 68Ga-derived SOR values. This may be attributed to the higher background caused by the additional γ-rays. On the Siemens system, an overestimation of scatter correction in the central part of the phantom was observed causing a virtual disappearance of spillover inside the three-rod phantom.
CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, 44Sc appears to be a suitable alternative to 68Ga. The superior image resolution makes it an especially strong competitor in preclinical settings. The additional γ-emissions have a small impact on the imaging resolution but cause higher background noises and can effect an overestimation of scatter correction, depending on the PET system and phantom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image quality; Phantom study; Positron energy; Positron range; Resolution; Scandium-44; Small animal PET

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166581     DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-0286-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Phys        ISSN: 2197-7364


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in the Development of Tetrazine Ligation Tools for Pretargeted Nuclear Imaging.

Authors:  Rocío García-Vázquez; Umberto Maria Battisti; Matthias M Herth
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  Production of scandium radionuclides for theranostic applications: towards standardization of quality requirements.

Authors:  R Mikolajczak; S Huclier-Markai; C Alliot; F Haddad; D Szikra; V Forgacs; P Garnuszek
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Glioblastoma by Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eduardo Ruiz-López; Juan Calatayud-Pérez; Irene Castells-Yus; María José Gimeno-Peribáñez; Noelia Mendoza-Calvo; Miguel Ángel Morcillo; Alberto J Schuhmacher
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Separation of 44Sc from 44Ti in the Context of A Generator System for Radiopharmaceutical Purposes with the Example of [44Sc]Sc-PSMA-617 and [44Sc]Sc-PSMA-I&T Synthesis.

Authors:  Anton A Larenkov; Artur G Makichyan; Vladimir N Iatsenko
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging of 18F and 89Zr as compared with ex vivo biodistribution in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Marion Chomet; Maxime Schreurs; Ricardo Vos; Mariska Verlaan; Esther J Kooijman; Alex J Poot; Ronald Boellaard; Albert D Windhorst; Guus Ams van Dongen; Danielle J Vugts; Marc C Huisman; Wissam Beaino
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.