Ryan Solinsky1,2,3, Isabelle Vivodtzev4, J W Hamner4, J Andrew Taylor4,5,6. 1. Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA. rsolinsky@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. rsolinsky@mgh.harvard.edu. 3. Spaulding Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA. rsolinsky@mgh.harvard.edu. 4. Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA. 5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Spaulding Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To define differences in heart rate and blood pressure variability (HRV/BPV) after spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with uninjured controls, and to determine whether variabilities are impacted by whole-body exercise after SCI. METHODS: Individuals with SCI (n = 40), aged 18-40, and uninjured age/sex-matched controls (n = 22) had HRV and BPV determined during supine paced (0.25 Hz) breathing. Spectral and cross-spectral values were derived for fluctuations at low (LF 0.05-0.15 Hz) and high (HF 0.20-0.30 Hz) frequencies. Thirty-two individuals with SCI further underwent either 6 months of whole-body exercise training (n = 17) or a control intervention (n = 15). RESULTS: Individuals with SCI had injuries graded A-C in severity, neurological levels of injury C1-T10. LF and HF HRV and LF BPV were significantly lower in individuals with SCI (p = 0.008-0.002), though HF BPV was similar. The LF cross-spectrum demonstrated similar phase and gain relationships between groups. The HF phase relationship between pressure and heart rate differed markedly: individuals with SCI demonstrated a -11.7 ± 3.4° phase lag (241 ± 70 ms feedback mechanism of pressure into heart rate), whereas uninjured controls demonstrated a +21.5 ± 10.8° phase lead (443 ± 224 ms feedforward mechanism of heart rate into pressure, p = 0.007). Whole-body exercise increased mean VO2peak by 2.09 ml/kg, whereas HRV, BPV, and their cross-spectral relationships were not significantly altered relative to the control intervention after SCI. CONCLUSION: After SCI, marked frequency-specific differences exist in the relationship between heart rate and blood pressure variabilities. The high-frequency cross-spectral relationship indicates that a feedback mechanism of blood pressure into heart rate may predominate in this range.
PURPOSE: To define differences in heart rate and blood pressure variability (HRV/BPV) after spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with uninjured controls, and to determine whether variabilities are impacted by whole-body exercise after SCI. METHODS: Individuals with SCI (n = 40), aged 18-40, and uninjured age/sex-matched controls (n = 22) had HRV and BPV determined during supine paced (0.25 Hz) breathing. Spectral and cross-spectral values were derived for fluctuations at low (LF 0.05-0.15 Hz) and high (HF 0.20-0.30 Hz) frequencies. Thirty-two individuals with SCI further underwent either 6 months of whole-body exercise training (n = 17) or a control intervention (n = 15). RESULTS: Individuals with SCI had injuries graded A-C in severity, neurological levels of injury C1-T10. LF and HF HRV and LF BPV were significantly lower in individuals with SCI (p = 0.008-0.002), though HF BPV was similar. The LF cross-spectrum demonstrated similar phase and gain relationships between groups. The HF phase relationship between pressure and heart rate differed markedly: individuals with SCI demonstrated a -11.7 ± 3.4° phase lag (241 ± 70 ms feedback mechanism of pressure into heart rate), whereas uninjured controls demonstrated a +21.5 ± 10.8° phase lead (443 ± 224 ms feedforward mechanism of heart rate into pressure, p = 0.007). Whole-body exercise increased mean VO2peak by 2.09 ml/kg, whereas HRV, BPV, and their cross-spectral relationships were not significantly altered relative to the control intervention after SCI. CONCLUSION: After SCI, marked frequency-specific differences exist in the relationship between heart rate and blood pressure variabilities. The high-frequency cross-spectral relationship indicates that a feedback mechanism of blood pressure into heart rate may predominate in this range.