Literature DB >> 32166409

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Children is Safe with Most Pacemaker Systems, Including Those with Epicardial Leads.

Madeline Bireley1, Joshua R Kovach2,3, Candace Morton2,3, Joseph R Cava2,3, Amy Y Pan4, Melodee Nugent4, Margaret M Samyn5,6.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with pacemakers remains concerning because of possible magnetic field effects on the device. Many pacemaker models are labeled as non-conditional, or contraindicated for MRI, or do not have any specific safety guidelines listed. This study describes our experience with pacemaker function and adverse events in pediatric and young adult patients after clinically indicated MRI scanning at 1.5 Tesla (T). We hypothesized that generator battery voltage, pacemaker lead threshold, and lead impedance would not be altered by MRI. This was a retrospective review of Children's Wisconsin clinical MRI data for all patients with pacemakers scanned between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2018. Pacemakers were interrogated by the Electrophysiology Team before and immediately after MRI and at outpatient follow up. Twenty-one patients underwent forty-four MRI scans. No significant immediate changes were seen in any pacemaker parameter for any manufacturer/model/lead at the time of MRI. At first clinical follow up post MRI, (median 4.4 months, range 0.2-12.3), battery voltage was reduced (2.78 V pre-MRI versus 2.77 V at follow up, p = 0.02), but there were no other significant changes. No adverse events were noted. Pediatric patients with pacemakers, including those with epicardial leads, can be scanned at 1.5 T safely without alteration in pacemaker function. Using appropriate precautions, pediatric patients with pacemakers can be imaged with MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epicardial leads; MRI; Pacemaker; Pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166409     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-020-02316-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  3 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing neonatal cardiac imaging (magnetic resonance/computed tomography).

Authors:  Karen I Ramirez-Suarez; Luis Octavio Tierradentro-García; Hansel J Otero; Jordan B Rapp; Ammie M White; Sara L Partington; Matthew A Harris; Seth A Vatsky; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; David M Biko
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-10-17

Review 2.  Highlights of the Virtual Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2022 Scientific Conference: CMR: improving cardiovascular care around the world.

Authors:  Vineeta Ojha; Omar K Khalique; Rishabh Khurana; Daniel Lorenzatti; Steve W Leung; Benny Lawton; Timothy C Slesnick; Joao C Cavalcante; Chiara-Bucciarelli Ducci; Amit R Patel; Claudia C Prieto; Sven Plein; Subha V Raman; Michael Salerno; Purvi Parwani
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.903

3.  2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maully J Shah; Michael J Silka; Jennifer N Avari Silva; Seshadri Balaji; Cheyenne M Beach; Monica N Benjamin; Charles I Berul; Bryan Cannon; Frank Cecchin; Mitchell I Cohen; Aarti S Dalal; Brynn E Dechert; Anne Foster; Roman Gebauer; M Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia; Prince J Kannankeril; Peter P Karpawich; Jeffery J Kim; Mani Ram Krishna; Peter Kubuš; Martin J LaPage; Douglas Y Mah; Lindsey Malloy-Walton; Aya Miyazaki; Kara S Motonaga; Mary C Niu; Melissa Olen; Thomas Paul; Eric Rosenthal; Elizabeth V Saarel; Massimo Stefano Silvetti; Elizabeth A Stephenson; Reina B Tan; John Triedman; Nicholas H Von Bergen; Philip L Wackel
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.