| Literature DB >> 32166293 |
Tracey G Polsky1,2, Eloise Salmon3, Sarah S Welsh4,5, Derick Lim1, Sheng Feng1,2, Lance Ballester6, Abdulla M Ehlayel3, Jennifer L Hewlett7, Michelle R Denburg2,3, Donald L Boyer2,4, Ulf H Beier2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We observed that patients treated with continuous vecuronium or esmolol infusions showed elevated plasma sodium measurements when measured by the routine chemistry analyzer as part of the basic metabolic panel (Vitros 5600; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ), but not by blood gas analyzers (RAPIDLab 1265; Siemens, Tarrytown, NY). Both instruments use direct ion-selective electrode technology, albeit with different sodium ionophores (basic metabolic panel: methyl monensin, blood gas: glass). We questioned if the basic metabolic panel hypernatremia represents artefactual pseudohypernatremia.Entities:
Keywords: Vitros; hypernatremia; laboratory interference; methyl monensin; sodium measurement
Year: 2020 PMID: 32166293 PMCID: PMC7063907 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care Explor ISSN: 2639-8028
Figure 4.Electronic medical record review supports drug-induced pseudohypernatremia. Electronic medical records of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia were systematically queried for patients receiving esmolol and/or vecuronium at some point during their hospital stay(s) during 2016–2018. A and B, Show data on vecuronium and (C, D) esmolol. A and C, Shows a histogram of non-zero values of mean drug doses using the Terrel and Scott algorithm (9). B and C, Shows the predicted Δ sodium (BMP–BG) within ± 12 hr after vecuronium or esmolol administration up to 12 hr. The predicted Δ sodium (BMP–BG) is plotted as solid line and calculated from using normally distributed generalized estimating equations with compound symmetry covariance that was estimated using the maximum likelihood estimator. The dashed lines and gray areas indicate 95% CIs of the predicted Δ sodium (BMP–BG) using empirical ses. ** and ***indicate p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively. BG = blood gas, BMP = basic metabolic panel.
Figure 5.Dose-response curves of vecuronium and esmolol on basic metabolic panel (BMP) sodium. A, Vitros 5600 sodium measurements from patients in Figure 4 matched with esmolol or vecuronium treatment doses (normalized to mg/kg/hr). Solid lines indicate plotted regression curves. Dashed lines indicate 95% CIs of the best fit line. B, Overlay of fitted curves from Figure 5A and Figure 2C, showing a similar relationship between esmolol and vecuronium exposure and Vitros 5600 sodium measurements in vitro when drugs were added to plasma (right y-axis, lower x-axis) and in vivo, from patients treated with vecuronium or esmolol (left y-axis, upper x-axis).
Figure 2.Vecuronium and esmolol added to plasma replicate pseudohypernatremia. Esmolol hydrochloric acid (A) and vecuronium bromide (B) were added to pooled plasma samples. Basic metabolic panel (BMP) sodium was measured by the Vitros 5600, Vitros 4600, and Beckman Coulter AU 5822 (AU). Blood gas (BG) sodium was measured by the 1265 RAPIDLab BG analyzer. The expected sodium is calculated based upon the baseline sodium measurement in the plasma pool without added drug, and the dilution factor of the esmolol or vecuronium in the plasma mixture. The shaded area indicates measurements where the absolute sodium concentration was greater than 250 mmol/L, likely underestimating the amount of pseudohypernatremia. C, Linear regression of absolute sodium measurements and drug concentrations show that both vecuronium and esmolol increased sodium measurements in a dose-dependent manner. Negative controls using nicardipine (D), cisatracurium (E), and labetalol (F). Arrows indicate 10% increase in BMP sodium measurements in vecuronium and esmolol (red), as well as cisatracurium and labetalol (purple). Data were obtained on two independent devices and displayed as mean ± sem.