Literature DB >> 32166142

Progress in automating patch clamp cellular physiology.

Luca A Annecchino1, Simon R Schultz1.   

Abstract

Patch clamp electrophysiology has transformed research in the life sciences over the last few decades. Since their inception, automatic patch clamp platforms have evolved considerably, demonstrating the capability to address both voltage- and ligand-gated channels, and showing the potential to play a pivotal role in drug discovery and biomedical research. Unfortunately, the cell suspension assays to which early systems were limited cannot recreate biologically relevant cellular environments, or capture higher order aspects of synaptic physiology and network dynamics. In vivo patch clamp electrophysiology has the potential to yield more biologically complex information and be especially useful in reverse engineering the molecular and cellular mechanisms of single-cell and network neuronal computation, while capturing important aspects of human disease mechanisms and possible therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, it is a difficult procedure with a steep learning curve, which has restricted dissemination of the technique. Luckily, in vivo patch clamp electrophysiology seems particularly amenable to robotic automation. In this review, we document the development of automated patch clamp technology, from early systems based on multi-well plates through to automated planar-array platforms, and modern robotic platforms capable of performing two-photon targeted whole-cell electrophysiological recordings in vivo.
© The Author(s) 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated electrophysiology; neuroscience; patch clamp; robotic automation

Year:  2018        PMID: 32166142      PMCID: PMC7058203          DOI: 10.1177/2398212818776561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv        ISSN: 2398-2128


  5 in total

1.  Accounting for variability in ion current recordings using a mathematical model of artefacts in voltage-clamp experiments.

Authors:  Chon Lok Lei; Michael Clerx; Dominic G Whittaker; David J Gavaghan; Teun P de Boer; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Drug Screening with Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensors: Today and Tomorrow.

Authors:  Ekaterina S Potekhina; Dina Y Bass; Ilya V Kelmanson; Elena S Fetisova; Alexander V Ivanenko; Vsevolod V Belousov; Dmitry S Bilan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  All-Optical and Label-Free Stimulation of Action Potentials in Neurons and Cardiomyocytes by Plasmonic Porous Metamaterials.

Authors:  Giulia Bruno; Giovanni Melle; Andrea Barbaglia; Giuseppina Iachetta; Rustamzhon Melikov; Michela Perrone; Michele Dipalo; Francesco De Angelis
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 4.  Peripheral mechanisms of arthritic pain: A proposal to leverage large animals for in vitro studies.

Authors:  Sampurna Chakrabarti; Minji Ai; Frances M D Henson; Ewan St John Smith
Journal:  Neurobiol Pain       Date:  2020-07-28

Review 5.  Novel test strategies for in vitro seizure liability assessment.

Authors:  Anke M Tukker; Remco H S Westerink
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.