| Literature DB >> 32166080 |
Tanvi Verma1, Payal Sharma1, Piush Kumar1, Kirti Tyagi1, Shalaj Bhatnagar1, Monis Raza1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antimicrobial property of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) when polymerized with cold cure acrylic and to assess the duration of its release from modified acrylic.Entities:
Keywords: Cetylpyridinium chloride; Streptococcus mutans; modified acrylic resin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32166080 PMCID: PMC7041310 DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_6_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthod Sci ISSN: 2278-0203
Distribution of groups depending on concentration of CPC
| Groups | Concentration of CPC | Sample size | Color used |
|---|---|---|---|
| I (Control) | 0% | 45 | Yellow |
| II | 2.5% | 45 | Red |
| III | 5% | 45 | Green |
| IV | 10% | 45 | Blue |
CPC: cetylpyridinium chloride
Figure 1Agar plate with disc from each group
Figure 2Diametraltensile strength calculation with Universal Testing Machine
Figure 3Amount of CPC release checked through spectrophotometer
Figure 4One agar plate used for four acrylic discs (one from each group) to evaluate growth inhibition zone around each disc
Figure 5Close-up view of specimen in place while testing diametral tensile strength
Bacterial inhibition (in mm) around the acrylic discs in all groups
| Days | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.15 |
| 14 | 0 | 1.475 | 1.65 | 1.7625 |
| 28 | 0 | 1.225 | 1.4 | 1.9375 |
| 42 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.475 | 1.675 |
| 56 | 0 | 1.15 | 1.2 | 1.675 |
| 70 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.35 | 1.6125 |
| 84 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.65 | 1.6725 |
| 98 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.95 | 1.2 |
| 102 | 0 | 1.225 | 1.325 | 1.4 |
| 116 | 0 | 0.975 | 0.9875 | 1.175 |
| 130 | 0 | 1.6125 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 144 | 0 | 1.1125 | 0.975 | 1.1625 |
| 158 | 0 | 1.125 | 1.1625 | 1.175 |
| 172 | 0 | 1 | 1.1125 | 1.0625 |
| 196 | 0 | 1.475 | 1.35 | 1.15 |
| Mean±SD | 0±0.00 | 1.28±0.00 | 1.24±0.00 | 1.51±0.00 |
| <0.001* | ||||
| 1<2,3,4 | ||||
*P<0.05. SD: Standard deviation
Amount of cetylpyridinium chloride release from the acrylic discs
| Day 7 (a) | Day 15 (b) | Day 30 (c) | Day 60 (d) | Day 180 (e) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I ( | |||||||
| Mean | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | - |
| SD | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Group II ( | |||||||
| Mean | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.46 | 0.017* | a, b, c, d>e |
| SD | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
| Group III ( | |||||||
| Mean | 1.42 | 1.12 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.06 | 0.018* | a, c, d>b, e |
| SD | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||
| Group IV ( | |||||||
| Mean | 1.99 | 1.63 | 1.73 | 1.94 | 1.79 | 0.19 NS | - |
| SD | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
*P<0.05. SD: Standard deviation; NS: Not significant
Diametral tensile strength (in MPa) of modified acrylic discs before and after water aging
| DTS before water aging | DTS after water aging | Mean difference | SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Group I ( | 512.94 | 86.93 | 474.76 | 115.62 | 38.18 | 116.66 | 0.241 NS |
| Group II ( | 209.72 | 42.97 | 175.47 | 34.03 | 34.25 | 48.53 | 0.047* |
| Group III ( | 206.01 | 29.89 | 156.77 | 32.36 | 49.24 | 37.18 | 0.009* |
| Group IV ( | 181.16 | 34.69 | 106.73 | 18.09 | 74.43 | 33.98 | 0.005* |
| <0.001* | <0.001* | ||||||
| Gr1>Gr2, Gr3, Gr4 | Gr1>Gr2, Gr3, Gr4 Gr1>Gr2>Gr4 Gr1>Gr3>Gr4 Gr4<Gr3, Gr2<Gr1 | ||||||
DTS: diametral tensile strength; SD: standard deviation; NS: not significant, bWilcoxon signed-rank test cMann Whitney U Test, *Significant (P<0.05)