Literature DB >> 32165431

Variation in outer blubber lipid concentration does not reflect morphological body condition in humpback whales.

Fredrik Christiansen1,2,3, Kate R Sprogis2,3, Jasmin Gross4, Juliana Castrillon4, Hunter A Warick3, Eva Leunissen5, Susan Bengtson Nash4.   

Abstract

An animal's body condition provides valuable information for ecophysiological studies, and is an important measure of fitness in population monitoring and conservation. While both the external body shape of an animal and its internal tissues (i.e. fat content) can be used as a measure of body condition, the relationship between the two is not always linear. We compared the morphological body condition (external metric obtained through aerial photogrammetry) of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) with their outer blubber lipid concentration (internal metric obtained through blubber biopsy sampling) off the coast of south-west Australia early and late in the breeding season (spanning ∼4.5 months). The external body condition index of juvenile and adult humpback whales decreased by 26.9 (from 18.8% to -8.1%) and 12.0 percentage points (from 8.6% to -3.4%), respectively, between the early and late phase. In contrast, we found no intra-seasonal change in blubber lipid concentration, and no difference between reproductive classes (juveniles, adults and lactating females); however, the small sample size prevented us from effectively testing these effects. Importantly, however, in the 33 animals for which paired metrics were obtained, we found no correlation between the morphometric body condition index and the blubber lipid concentration of individual whales. The lack of a linear relationship suggests that changes in outer blubber lipid concentration do not reflect external changes in body shape, thus limiting the utility of outer blubber lipid reserves for individual body condition evaluation. The wider spectrum of change in body morphometry captured with aerial photogrammetry supports the use of body morphometry as a reliable and well-tested method.
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baleen whales; Biopsy sampling; Cost of reproduction; Energy reserves; Photogrammetry; Unmanned aerial vehicle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32165431     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.213769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating cetacean body condition; a review of traditional approaches and new developments.

Authors:  Juliana Castrillon; Susan Bengtson Nash
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Aerial photogrammetry and tag-derived tissue density reveal patterns of lipid-store body condition of humpback whales on their feeding grounds.

Authors:  Kagari Aoki; Saana Isojunno; Charlotte Bellot; Takashi Iwata; Joanna Kershaw; Yu Akiyama; Lucía M Martín López; Christian Ramp; Martin Biuw; René Swift; Paul J Wensveen; Patrick Pomeroy; Tomoko Narazaki; Ailsa Hall; Katsufumi Sato; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Interannual variability in the lipid and fatty acid profiles of east Australia-migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) across a 10-year timeline.

Authors:  Jasmin Groß; Patti Virtue; Peter D Nichols; Pascale Eisenmann; Courtney A Waugh; Susan Bengtson Nash
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Accuracy and precision of citizen scientist animal counts from drone imagery.

Authors:  Sarah A Wood; Patrick W Robinson; Daniel P Costa; Roxanne S Beltran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.