Literature DB >> 32165277

Caregiver Reported Reasons for Delay of Neonatal Circumcision.

Deborah L Jacobson1, Anthony D'Oro1, Fizan Abdullah2, Katherine A Barsness2, Dennis B Liu1, Max Maizels1, Ilina Rosoklija1, Emilie K Johnson3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine caregiver-reported reasons for delay of desired neonatal circumcision.
METHODS: Caregivers requesting elective outpatient circumcision at two urban tertiary care hospitals were surveyed from 1/2017 to 12/2018. Boys >3 years and those with abnormal penile anatomy were excluded. Patient/parent demographics, insurance status, comorbidities, birth history, family history, reasons circumcision was desired, and reasons for circumcision delay were obtained.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 206/229 caregivers (90% response rate). Respondents were primarily mothers (74%) who identified as African-American (62%). Eligible boys presented at a median 7.5 months [0.3-35.6] and were predominantly African-American (63%), publicly-insured at birth (83%), and publicly-insured at present (86%). 80% were full-term. 83% had no comorbidities. Most caregivers (84%) requested inpatient circumcision, primarily for penile cleanliness (75%) and infection prevention (72%). Common reasons for delay included neonatal circumcision not being performed by the birth physician/hospital (26%) and prematurity (16%). Publicly-insured boys were more likely to encounter delays related birth physician/hospital not performing circumcisions (P = .02). Non-Caucasian/mixed race boys were less likely to be eligible for circumcision without general anesthesia (P = .004). In 108 cases (52%), circumcision was requested for full-term boys without comorbidities. Of these, 72 (35% of the cohort) now require general anesthesia to undergo circumcision.
CONCLUSION: Among 206 boys experiencing circumcision delay, most were full-term, African-American, and publicly-insured. Common reasons for delay included neonatal circumcision not being performed by the birth hospital/physician and prematurity. General anesthesia could have been avoided in >35% of boys if circumcision was performed at birth.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32165277     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

1.  Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey.

Authors:  Ushasi Naha; Hans C Arora; Ryan F Walton; Ilina Rosoklija; Lindsay M Skibley; Emilie K Johnson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Evaluation of maternal preferences for neonatal male circumcision in Enugu Nigeria.

Authors:  Uchechukwu Obiora Ezomike; Josephat Maduabuchi Chinawa; Joseph T Enebe; Euzebus Chinonye Ezugwu; Elias C Aniwada; Nkeiruka Elsie Ezomike; Awoere T Chinawa; Sebastian Okwuchukwu Ekenze
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.