Literature DB >> 32164952

PRECICE intramedullary nail in the treatment of adult leg length discrepancy.

Filip Cosic1, Elton Edwards2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limb length discrepancy in adults is not an uncommon occurrence following trauma and limited literature exists on limb lengthening in skeletally mature populations using modern techniques. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of limb lengthening surgery using the PRECICE magnetic limb lengthening intramedullary nail in an adult population.
METHOD: From 2013 to 2018, 21 adult patients were operated by a single surgeon, using the PRECICE nail, for lower limb length discrepancies. Low energy femoral osteotomies were performed via a limited approach. Tibial osteotomies were performed using a percutaneous technique and Gigli saw. A distraction rate of 0.75 mm/day was used as a standard protocol with change in rate of 0.25 mm/day implemented as required. Patients were followed up until radiological evidence of consolidation.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 36.4 years (range 21-65), with 19 patients being male. Seventeen femoral and four tibial lengthenings were performed. Mean follow up was 15.1 months (range 6-30). Eleven patients underwent deformity correction at time of nail insertion (10 femoral, 1 tibial). All patients achieved correct lengthening (mean gain 36.5 mm, range 18-80 mm). All patients consolidated their regenerate bone (mean 268 days, range 99-825). Mean femoral consolidation index was 6.5, mean tibial consolidation index was 16.1 (p = 0.002). Six patients had delayed consolidation of regenerate bone. Increasing age (p = 0.04), number of prior operations (p = 0.03), and smoking (p = 0.01) were associated with delayed consolidation. Four of 21 (19%) patients suffered a complication, with one implant failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRECICE intramedullary nail is a reliable limb lengthening device in skeletally mature patients, providing predictable lengthening and bone regeneration.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone lengthening; Intramedullary nailing; Leg length inequality; Leginjuries; Lower extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32164952     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  What Factors Correlate With Length of Stay and Readmission After Limb Lengthening Procedures? A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Ashish Mittal; Sachin Allahabadi; Rishab Jayaram; Abhinav Nalluri; Matt Callahan; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Functional outcomes and complications of tibial lengthening using unilateral external fixation and then plating. A prospective case series.

Authors:  Luong Van Nguyen; Doan Van Le
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-19

3.  Feasibility of Computer-Aided Design in Limb Lengthening Surgery: Surgical Simulation and Guide Plates.

Authors:  Kai Cheng; Yuanhao Peng; Xiaonan Yan; Xinghua Wen; Huanwen Ding
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion.

Authors:  Bjoern Vogt; Robert Roedl; Georg Gosheger; Gregor Toporowski; Andrea Laufer; Christoph Theil; Jan Niklas Broeking; Adrien Frommer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Systematic review of complications with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails (FITBONE and PRECICE) in 983 segments.

Authors:  Markus W Frost; Ole Rahbek; Jens Traerup; Adriano A Ceccotti; Søren Kold
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.