Literature DB >> 32164393

How to Ease the Pain of Taking a Diagnostic Point of Care Test to the Market: A Framework for Evidence Development.

Sara Graziadio1, Amanda Winter1, B Clare Lendrem2, Jana Suklan2, William S Jones2, Samuel G Urwin1, Rachel A O'Leary1, Rachel Dickinson1, Anna Halstead2, Kasia Kurowska2, Kile Green2, Andrew Sims1, A John Simpson2, H Michael Power2, A Joy Allen2.   

Abstract

Bringing a diagnostic point of care test (POCT) to a healthcare market can be a painful experience as it requires the manufacturer to meet considerable technical, financial, managerial, and regulatory challenges. In this opinion article we propose a framework for developing the evidence needed to support product development, marketing, and adoption. We discuss each step in the evidence development pathway from the invention phase to the implementation of a new POCT in the healthcare system. We highlight the importance of articulating the value propositions and documenting the care pathway. We provide guidance on how to conduct care pathway analysis as little has been published on this. We summarize the clinical, economic and qualitative studies to be considered for developing evidence, and provide useful links to relevant software, on-line applications, websites, and give practical advice. We also provide advice on patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE), and on product management. Our aim is to help device manufacturers to understand the concepts and terminology used in evaluation of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) so that they can communicate effectively with evaluation methodologists, statisticians, and health economists. Manufacturers of medical tests and devices can use the proposed framework to plan their evidence development strategy in alignment with device development, applications for regulatory approval, and publication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adoption; care pathway analysis; diagnostic; evidence generation; implementation; medical device; point of care; preparation for marketing; value proposition

Year:  2020        PMID: 32164393     DOI: 10.3390/mi11030291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-666X            Impact factor:   2.891


  4 in total

1.  Unmet clinical needs for COVID-19 tests in UK health and social care settings.

Authors:  Sara Graziadio; Samuel G Urwin; Paola Cocco; Massimo Micocci; Amanda Winter; Yaling Yang; D Ashley Price; Mike Messenger; A Joy Allen; Bethany Shinkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy with Total Adenosine Deaminase as a Biomarker for Discriminating Pleural Transudates and Exudates in a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bernardo Henrique Ferraz Maranhão; Cyro Teixeira da Silva Junior; Jorge Luiz Barillo; Carmem Lucia Teixeira de Castro; Joeber Bernardo Soares de Souza; Patricia Siqueira Silva; Roberto Stirbulov
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in UK NHS ICUs: the perceived value and role of a novel optical technology.

Authors:  S Graziadio; A J Allen; W S Jones; J Suklan; A Winter; K Green; T Craven; A Bruce; J Mair; K Dhaliwal; T Walsh; A J Simpson
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Bayesian sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Kevin J Wilson; S Faye Williamson; A Joy Allen; Cameron J Williams; Thomas P Hellyer; B Clare Lendrem
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.