Literature DB >> 32163741

Does environmental decentralization exacerbate China's carbon emissions? Evidence based on dynamic threshold effect analysis.

Qiying Ran1, Jinning Zhang2, Yu Hao3.   

Abstract

As an institutional influential factor of environmental quality, environmental decentralization may play an important role in carbon emission control. Given China's rapid economic development and increasing environmental pollution, this study aims to investigate how environmental decentralization affects China's carbon emissions. Environmental decentralization indicators are reconstructed from the perspective of dynamic changes in the number of staff in environmental protection agencies on the basis of China's 30 provinces from 2005 to 2016. Spatial panel and dynamic threshold models are employed to investigate the impacts of environmental decentralization on carbon emissions. Results indicate that a remarkably positive spatial correlation is found in regional carbon emissions in China, and environmental decentralization has a positive impact on carbon emissions, suggesting that China's current environmental decentralization system may be unconducive to carbon emission control. Taking different environmental decentralization types as threshold variables, results from the dynamic threshold panel model show that environmental administrative decentralization and environmental monitoring decentralization have a positive threshold promoting effect on carbon emissions, whereas environmental supervision decentralization has a negative threshold inhibiting effect on carbon emissions. Therefore, the environmental administrative and monitoring power of local governments must be appropriately reduced and an environmental management mechanism must be developed for joint prevention and control to reduce carbon emissions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon emission; Dynamic threshold panel model; Environmental decentralization; Spatial econometric model

Year:  2020        PMID: 32163741     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Does Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Alleviate Urban Haze Pollution? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.

Authors:  Jinling Yan; Junfeng Zhao; Xiaodong Yang; Xufeng Su; Hailing Wang; Qiying Ran; Jianliang Shen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  How Do Environmental Regulation and Environmental Decentralization Affect Regional Green Innovation? Empirical Research from China.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Shilong Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The "Local Neighborhood" Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China.

Authors:  Yanwei Lyu; Jinning Zhang; Fei Yang; Di Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Impact of China's environmental decentralization on carbon emissions from energy consumption: an empirical study based on the dynamic spatial econometric model.

Authors:  Xianzhao Liu; Xu Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Implementation of a Multi-Agent Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy under the Chinese Dual Governance System: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach.

Authors:  Wenke Wang; Xiaoqiong You; Kebei Liu; Yenchun Jim Wu; Daming You
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.