| Literature DB >> 32163469 |
Micah Levy1,2, Christine M Bassis3, Eric Kennedy2,4, Katie E Yoest5, Jill B Becker5,6, Jason Bell7, Mitchell B Berger7,8, Tim M Bruns2,4.
Abstract
Treatment options are limited for the approximately 40% of postmenopausal women worldwide who suffer from female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Neural stimulation has shown potential as a treatment for genital arousal FSD, however the mechanisms for its improvement are unknown. One potential cause of some cases of genital arousal FSD are changes to the composition of the vaginal microbiota, which is associated with vulvovaginal atrophy. The primary hypothesis of this study was that neural stimulation may induce healthy changes in the vaginal microbiome, thereby improving genital arousal FSD symptoms. In this study we used healthy rats, which are a common animal model for sexual function, however the rat vaginal microbiome is understudied. Thus this study also sought to examine the composition of the rat vaginal microbiota. Treatment rats (n = 5) received 30 minutes of cutaneous electrical stimulation targeting the genital branch of the pudendal nerve, and Control animals (n = 4) had 30-minute sessions without stimulation. Vaginal lavage samples were taken during a 14-day baseline period including multiple estrous periods and after twice-weekly 30-minute sessions across a six-week trial period. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences was used to characterize the rat vaginal microbiota in baseline samples and determine the effect of stimulation. We found that the rat vaginal microbiota is dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, which changed in relative abundance during the estrous cycle and in relationship to each other. While the overall stimulation effects were unclear in these healthy rats, some Treatment animals had less alteration in microbiota composition between sequential samples than Control animals, suggesting that stimulation may help stabilize the vaginal microbiome. Future studies may consider additional physiological parameters, in addition to the microbiome composition, to further examine vaginal health and the effects of stimulation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32163469 PMCID: PMC7067422 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Taxonomic ranking of twenty most abundant OTU.
| OTU | Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU1 | ||||||
| OTU2 | ||||||
| OTU3 | ||||||
| OTU4 | ||||||
| OTU5 | ||||||
| OTU6 | ||||||
| OTU7 | ||||||
| OTU8 | ||||||
| OTU9 | ||||||
| OTU10 | ||||||
| OTU11 | ||||||
| OTU12 | ||||||
| OTU13 | ||||||
| OTU14 | ||||||
| OTU15 | ||||||
| OTU16 | ||||||
| OTU17 | ||||||
| OTU18 | ||||||
| OTU19 | ||||||
| QTU20 |
Fig 1Community composition of Control and Treatment samples over time.
Changes in relative abundance of key groups plotted over the baseline and trial periods for A) Control and B) Treatment animals.
Fig 2Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of all samples during baseline period.
Two-dimensional distances identify dissimilarities between samples based on relative abundances of OTU. Biplot arrows indicate specific OTU which drive samples to different locations on the plot. The first PCoA axis (x-axis) included 15% of all variance. The second PCoA axis (y-axis) included 12% of all variance. Icons for estrus and diestrus are enlarged to help visualize the relative clustering of each.
Fig 3Variations in OTU abundances based on estrous phase characterization.
A) OTU3 (Streptococcus) for Control and Treatment animals during baseline period. B) OTU7 (Corynebacterium) for Control and Treatment animals during baseline period. Similar trends were observed for both OTU3 and OTU7 when separated into Control-only and Treatment-only analyses.
Fig 4Examples of strong correlations in paired OTU sequence counts during baseline period.
A) Strong negative correlation between OTU1 (Proteus) and OTU5 (Pasteurellaceae) for all animals i) mean relative abundances and ii) paired scatter plot. B) Strong positive correlation between OTU9 (Aerococcus) and OTU10 (Jeotgalicoccus) in all animals, i) mean relative abundances and ii) paired scatter plot. C) Strong positive correlation between OTU13 (Romboutsia) and OTU17 (Turicibacter) in all animals, i) mean relative abundances and ii) paired scatter plot.
Fig 5Θyc distances between consecutive samples for Control and Treatment groups.
A) Example scatterplots of Θyc distances for consecutive samples for i) Control 1and ii) Treatment 2 animals. Baseline period in blue; Trial period in green. Estrous period (P/E/M/D for states) indicated at bottom of each plot. B) Mean Θyc distances during baseline and trial periods for i) Control and ii) Treatment animals. Icons in (A) correspond to same animals in (B).