Literature DB >> 32163180

Identification of patients with smouldering multiple myeloma at ultra-high risk of progression using serum parameters: the Czech Myeloma Group model.

Roman Hájek1,2,3, Viera Sandecka4, Ivan Špička5, Marc Raab6, Hartmut Goldschmidt6, Susanne Beck7, Jiří Minařík8, Petr Pavlíček9, Jakub Radocha10, Adriana Heindorfer11, Tomáš Jelínek1,2, Lukáš Stejskal12, Lucie Brožová13, Sabina Ševčíková3,14, Jan Straub5, Tomáš Pika8, Luděk Pour4, Vladimír Maisnar10, Anja Seckinger7, Dirk Hose7.   

Abstract

Smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) presents without MM defining symptoms. We aimed to identify patients with SMM with an 80% risk of progression within 2 years using only serum parameters. In total, 527 patients with SMM were included and divided into a training group (287 patients from the Czech Myeloma Group [CMG]) and an independent validation group (240 patients from Heidelberg). The median follow-up was 2·4 and 2·5 years, respectively. Progression to MM occurred in 51·9% of the CMG and 38·8% of the Heidelberg patients, respectively. The median risk of progression was 11·0% (CMG) and 9·7% (Heidelberg) per year, during the 5 years after diagnosis. A serum involved/uninvolved free light-chain ratio of >30, immunoparesis, and serum monoclonal (M) protein of ≥2·3 g/dl emerged as powerful predictors of 2-year progression rate with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2·49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1·49-4·17), HR of 2·01 (95% CI 1·36-2·96) and HR of 2·00 (95% CI 1·44-2·79) (P < 0·001) in univariate Cox regression analysis, respectively. Based on this, the CMG model identified patients with SMM with a 2-year risk of progression of 78·7% (95% CI 53·1-95·7; HR 6·8; P < 0·001, CMG) and 81·3% (95% CI 47·1-98·8; HR 38·63; P < 0·001, Heidelberg). Serum parameters in the CMG model allow identification of patients with SMM with an 80% risk of progression to symptomatic MM within 2 years.
© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multiple myeloma; overall survival; prognostic marker; progression-free survival; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32163180     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  3 in total

Review 1.  Risk Stratification and Treatment in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Tyler Lussier; Natalie Schoebe; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Testing Mayo Clinic's New 20/20/20 Risk Model in Another Cohort of Smoldering Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Camille Tessier; Thomas Allard; Jean-Samuel Boudreault; Rayan Kaedbey; Vincent Éthier; Fléchère Fortin; Michel Pavic
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  2021 European Myeloma Network review and consensus statement on smoldering multiple myeloma: how to distinguish (and manage) Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Authors:  Pellegrino Musto; Monika Engelhardt; Jo Caers; Niccolo' Bolli; Martin Kaiser; Niels Van de Donk; Evangelos Terpos; Annemiek Broijl; Carlos Fernández De Larrea; Francesca Gay; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Roman Hajek; Annette Juul Vangsted; Elena Zamagni; Sonja Zweegman; Michele Cavo; Meletios Dimopoulos; Hermann Einsele; Heinz Ludwig; Giovanni Barosi; Mario Boccadoro; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Pieter Sonneveld; Jesus San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.