A Salter1, A Stahmann2, D Ellenberger2, F Fneish2, W J Rodgers3, R Middleton3, R Nicholas4, R A Marrie5. 1. Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. 2. MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, German MS Register, Hannover, Germany. 3. Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK. 4. Imperial College London, London, UK. 5. Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of collaboration and retrospective data harmonization among three multiple sclerosis (MS) registries by investigating employment status. METHODS: We used the Maelstrom guidelines to facilitate retrospective harmonization of data from three MS registries, including the NARCOMS (North American Research Committee on MS) Registry, German MS Register (GMSR), and United Kingdom MS (UK-MS) Register. A protocol was developed based on the guidelines, and summary-level data were used to combine results. Employment status and a limited set of factors associated with employment (age, sex, education, and disability level) were harmonized. A meta-analytic approach was used to pool estimates using a weighted average of logistic regression estimates and their variances in a random effects model. RESULTS: Employment status, age, sex, education, and disability were mapped. The overall employment rate was 57% (11,143 employed out of 19,562 persons with MS) with the GMSR having the highest proportion of participants employed (66.2%), followed by the UK-MS (55.2%) and NARCOMS (43.0%) registries. As disability level increased, the odds of not being employed increased. CONCLUSION: Harmonization across registries was feasible. The Maelstrom guidelines provide a valuable roadmap for conducting high-quality harmonization projects. The pooling of data sources has the potential to be an important mechanism for conducting research in MS.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of collaboration and retrospective data harmonization among three multiple sclerosis (MS) registries by investigating employment status. METHODS: We used the Maelstrom guidelines to facilitate retrospective harmonization of data from three MS registries, including the NARCOMS (North American Research Committee on MS) Registry, German MS Register (GMSR), and United Kingdom MS (UK-MS) Register. A protocol was developed based on the guidelines, and summary-level data were used to combine results. Employment status and a limited set of factors associated with employment (age, sex, education, and disability level) were harmonized. A meta-analytic approach was used to pool estimates using a weighted average of logistic regression estimates and their variances in a random effects model. RESULTS: Employment status, age, sex, education, and disability were mapped. The overall employment rate was 57% (11,143 employed out of 19,562 persons with MS) with the GMSR having the highest proportion of participants employed (66.2%), followed by the UK-MS (55.2%) and NARCOMS (43.0%) registries. As disability level increased, the odds of not being employed increased. CONCLUSION: Harmonization across registries was feasible. The Maelstrom guidelines provide a valuable roadmap for conducting high-quality harmonization projects. The pooling of data sources has the potential to be an important mechanism for conducting research in MS.
Authors: Lotte Geys; Tina Parciak; Ashkan Pirmani; Robert McBurney; Hollie Schmidt; Tanja Malbaša; Tjalf Ziemssen; Arnfin Bergmann; Juan I Rojas; Edgardo Cristiano; Juan Antonio García-Merino; Óscar Fernández; Jens Kuhle; Claudio Gobbi; Amber Delmas; Steve Simpson-Yap; Nupur Nag; Bassem Yamout; Nina Steinemann; Pierrette Seeldrayers; Bénédicte Dubois; Ingrid van der Mei; Alexander Stahmann; Jelena Drulovic; Tatjana Pekmezovic; Waldemar Brola; Mar Tintore; Nynke Kalkers; Rumen Ivanov; Magd Zakaria; Maged Abdel Naseer; Wim Van Hecke; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Marina Boziki; Adriana Carra; Mikolaj A Pawlak; Ruth Dobson; Kerstin Hellwig; Arlene Gallagher; Letizia Leocani; Gloria Dalla Costa; Nise Alessandra de Carvalho Sousa; Bart Van Wijmeersch; Liesbet M Peeters Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2021-12-29
Authors: Amber Salter; Samantha Lancia; Gary Cutter; Robert J Fox; Ruth Ann Marrie; Jason P Mendoza; James B Lewin Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2021-07-09
Authors: Lynn Marie Trotti; Jason C Ong; David T Plante; Catherine Friederich Murray; Rebecca King; Donald L Bliwise Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: David Ellenberger; Tina Parciak; Waldemar Brola; Jan Hillert; Rod Middleton; Alexander Stahmann; Christoph Thalheim; Peter Flachenecker Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Niklas Frahm; Firas Fneish; David Ellenberger; Judith Haas; Micha Loebermann; Tina Parciak; Melanie Peters; Dieter Pöhlau; Jeff Rodgers; Anna-Lena Röper; Sarah Schilling; Alexander Stahmann; Herbert Temmes; Uwe K Zettl; Rodden M Middleton Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2022-09-02
Authors: Lisa-Marie Ohle; David Ellenberger; Peter Flachenecker; Tim Friede; Judith Haas; Kerstin Hellwig; Tina Parciak; Clemens Warnke; Friedemann Paul; Uwe K Zettl; Alexander Stahmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.379