Literature DB >> 32162806

An Analysis of Recent FDA Oncology Scientific Publications.

Julie A Schneider1, Andrew C Miklos2, James Onken3, Yutao Gong4, Anna Maria Calcagno2, Gideon M Blumenthal1, Richard Aragon2, Richard Pazdur1.   

Abstract

In addition to its primary regulatory role, the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is engaged in many forms of scientific authorship. During the period of 2010 to 2018, FDA oncology staff contributed to 356 publications in the scientific literature. Here, we collaborated with analysts in the Office of Program Planning, Analysis, and Evaluation at the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), to present a series of analyses aimed at quantifying the characteristics and potential impact of these contributions, as well as characterizing the areas of work addressed. We found that FDA oncology papers are enriched for high-impact publications and have about two times the number of citations as an average NIH-funded paper. Further impact of the publications was measured based on the presence of 65 publications that were cited by guidelines and 12 publications cited by publicly listed clinical trials. The results seen here are promising in determining the impact of FDA oncology publication work but prompt further investigation into longer-term impacts, such as the influence of this work on other regulatory activities at FDA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article describes the first comprehensive study of scientific publications produced by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oncology staff. The analysis illustrates that staff are highly engaged in publishing in the scientific literature in addition to completing regulatory review work. Publications are generally in clinical medicine, consistent with the large number of medical oncologists working at the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP). OHOP publications generally focus either on communicating important regulatory work (approval summaries) or highlighting regulatory science issues to encourage dialogue with the scientific community (commentaries, reviews, and expert working papers). The analysis also suggests that several FDA oncology publications may influence clinical guidelines, but further work is needed to evaluate impact. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Food and Drug Administration; Oncology publications

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32162806      PMCID: PMC7066718          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  20 in total

Review 1.  FDA analyses of survival in older adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies.

Authors:  Shanthi Marur; Harpreet Singh; Pallavi Mishra-Kalyani; Erin Larkins; Patricia Keegan; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Gideon M Blumenthal; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Drug Development and US Regulatory Review: Perspectives From Industry, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Patient.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Cindy Geoghegan; Stephen Joel Coons; Ari Gnanasakthy; Ashley F Slagle; Elektra J Papadopoulos; Paul G Kluetz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Model-informed drug development approach supporting approval of the 4-week (Q4W) dosing schedule for nivolumab (Opdivo) across multiple indications: a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Y Bi; J Liu; B Furmanski; H Zhao; J Yu; C Osgood; A Ward; P Keegan; B P Booth; A Rahman; Y Wang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Lung Master Protocol (Lung-MAP)-A Biomarker-Driven Protocol for Accelerating Development of Therapies for Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S1400.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; David R Gandara; Fred R Hirsch; Mary W Redman; Michael LeBlanc; Philip C Mack; Lawrence H Schwartz; Everett Vokes; Suresh S Ramalingam; Jeffrey D Bradley; Dana Sparks; Yang Zhou; Crystal Miwa; Vincent A Miller; Roman Yelensky; Yali Li; Jeff D Allen; Ellen V Sigal; David Wholley; Caroline C Sigman; Gideon M Blumenthal; Shakun Malik; Gary J Kelloff; Jeffrey S Abrams; Charles D Blanke; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Characterization of outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors past RECIST version 1.1-defined disease progression in clinical trials.

Authors:  Dickran Kazandjian; Patricia Keegan; Daniel L Suzman; Richard Pazdur; Gideon M Blumenthal
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Friends of Cancer Research HIV Working Group.

Authors:  Thomas S Uldrick; Gwynn Ison; Michelle A Rudek; Ariela Noy; Karl Schwartz; Suanna Bruinooge; Caroline Schenkel; Barry Miller; Kieron Dunleavy; Judy Wang; Jerome Zeldis; Richard F Little
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Suanna S Bruinooge; Samantha Roberts; Gwynn Ison; Nancy U Lin; Lia Gore; Thomas S Uldrick; Stuart M Lichtman; Nancy Roach; Julia A Beaver; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Paul J Hesketh; Andrea M Denicoff; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Eric Rubin; Pratik Multani; Tatiana M Prowell; Caroline Schenkel; Marina Kozak; Jeff Allen; Ellen Sigal; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Approvals in 2018: a histology-agnostic new molecular entity, novel end points and real-time review.

Authors:  Gideon M Blumenthal; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level.

Authors:  B Ian Hutchins; Xin Yuan; James M Anderson; George M Santangelo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Pembrolizumab KEYNOTE-001: an adaptive study leading to accelerated approval for two indications and a companion diagnostic.

Authors:  S P Kang; K Gergich; G M Lubiniecki; D P de Alwis; C Chen; M A B Tice; E H Rubin
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  1 in total

1.  Journal- or article-based citation measure? A study of academic promotion at a Swiss university.

Authors:  Nicole Steck; Lukas Stalder; Matthias Egger
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.