Literature DB >> 32162576

The safety evaluation of food flavoring substances: the role of genotoxicity studies.

Nigel J Gooderham1, Samuel M Cohen2, Gerhard Eisenbrand3, Shoji Fukushima4, F Peter Guengerich5, Stephen S Hecht6, Ivonne M C M Rietjens7, Thomas J Rosol8, Maria Bastaki9, Matthew J Linman9, Sean V Taylor9.   

Abstract

The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) Expert Panel relies on the weight of evidence from all available data in the safety evaluation of flavoring substances. This process includes data from genotoxicity studies designed to assess the potential of a chemical agent to react with DNA or otherwise cause changes to DNA, either in vitro or in vivo. The Panel has reviewed a large number of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies during the course of its ongoing safety evaluations of flavorings. The adherence of genotoxicity studies to standardized protocols and guidelines, the biological relevance of the results from those studies, and the human relevance of these studies are all important considerations in assessing whether the results raise specific concerns for genotoxic potential. The Panel evaluates genotoxicity studies not only for evidence of genotoxicity hazard, but also for the probability of risk to the consumer in the context of exposure from their use as flavoring substances. The majority of flavoring substances have given no indication of genotoxic potential in studies evaluated by the FEMA Expert Panel. Examples illustrating the assessment of genotoxicity data for flavoring substances and the consideration of the factors noted above are provided. The weight of evidence approach adopted by the FEMA Expert Panel leads to a rational assessment of risk associated with consumer intake of flavoring substances under the conditions of use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA adducts; FEMA GRAS; chromosomal damage; flavoring substance; flavors; genotoxicity; mutagenicity; risk assessment; safety assessment; weight of evidence

Year:  2020        PMID: 32162576     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1712589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  2 in total

1.  Scientific opinion on Prosmoke BW 01.

Authors:  Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Laurence Castle; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul J Fowler; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez; Peter Fürst; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Rainer Gürtler; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Detlef Wölfle; Matthew Wright; Romualdo Benigni; Claudia Bolognesi; Eugenia Cordelli; Kevin Chipman; Gisela Degen; Karin Nørby; Camilla Svendsen; Maria Carfì; Carla Martino; Alexandra Tard; Giorgia Vianello; Wim Mennes
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 2.  Revisiting the evidence for genotoxicity of acrylamide (AA), key to risk assessment of dietary AA exposure.

Authors:  Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.