Priyanka Ghosh1,2, Semih Gungor1,2. 1. Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation (t-SCS). There is also evidence that dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation may be superior to t-SCS in CRPS. However, there has been no published data, to our knowledge, that looked at the concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG stimulation for treatment of CRPS. METHODS: Our study includes four patients with severe CRPS who had all been implanted with a t-SCS. While all these patients had positive results from their t-SCS, they all had areas which lacked coverage, giving them incomplete pain relief. These patients also underwent successful trial and implantation of DRG-S. All four patients reported further improvement in their residual pain and function with DRG-S (>60%), and even superior pain relief (>80%) with concurrent use of t-SCS and t-SCS. RESULTS: All patients had a diagnosis of lower extremity CRPS-1. After DRG-S implantation, multiple attempts were made in each patient to use DRG-S alone by temporarily turning the t-SCS off. However, in each attempt, all patients consistently reported superior pain relief and improvement in function with the concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG, as compared to DRG alone. The average numeric rating scale pain score decreased from approximately 7 in the regions not covered by t-SCS to 3 after DRG-S implantation, and to 1.25 with concurrent use t-SCS and DRG-S. CONCLUSION: Both t-SCS and DRG-S have been shown to be effective in treatment of patients with CRPS. In our study, concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG-S provided significant improvement in pain and function as compared to using either device alone. This suggests the potential that combination therapy with t-SCS and DRG-S may be beneficial in patients with CRPS. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate this concept.
INTRODUCTION: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation (t-SCS). There is also evidence that dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation may be superior to t-SCS in CRPS. However, there has been no published data, to our knowledge, that looked at the concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG stimulation for treatment of CRPS. METHODS: Our study includes four patients with severe CRPS who had all been implanted with a t-SCS. While all these patients had positive results from their t-SCS, they all had areas which lacked coverage, giving them incomplete pain relief. These patients also underwent successful trial and implantation of DRG-S. All four patients reported further improvement in their residual pain and function with DRG-S (>60%), and even superior pain relief (>80%) with concurrent use of t-SCS and t-SCS. RESULTS: All patients had a diagnosis of lower extremity CRPS-1. After DRG-S implantation, multiple attempts were made in each patient to use DRG-S alone by temporarily turning the t-SCS off. However, in each attempt, all patients consistently reported superior pain relief and improvement in function with the concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG, as compared to DRG alone. The average numeric rating scale pain score decreased from approximately 7 in the regions not covered by t-SCS to 3 after DRG-S implantation, and to 1.25 with concurrent use t-SCS and DRG-S. CONCLUSION: Both t-SCS and DRG-S have been shown to be effective in treatment of patients with CRPS. In our study, concurrent use of t-SCS and DRG-S provided significant improvement in pain and function as compared to using either device alone. This suggests the potential that combination therapy with t-SCS and DRG-S may be beneficial in patients with CRPS. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate this concept.
Authors: R Norman Harden; Candida S McCabe; Andreas Goebel; Michael Massey; Tolga Suvar; Sharon Grieve; Stephen Bruehl Journal: Pain Med Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 3.637
Authors: Antonello Sica; Beniamino Casale; Caterina Sagnelli; Maria Teresa Di Dato; Pietro Buonavolontà; Anna Maria Salzano; Evangelista Sagnelli; Vincenzo Famiglietti; Elisabetta Saracco; Dario Tammaro; Alfonso Papa Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Ryan S D'Souza; Eva Kubrova; Yeng F Her; Ross A Barman; Brandon J Smith; Gabriel M Alvarez; Tyler E West; Alaa Abd-Elsayed Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 4.070