Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure1, Geraldo De Coulon2, Stephane Armand1. 1. Willy Taillard Laboratory of Kinesiology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Paediatric Orthopaedic Service, Department of Child and Teenagers, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIM: To explore how patients with cerebral palsy (CP) perceive their gait and evaluate associations between subjective gait perception and: objective gait parameters, endurance, pain, and fatigue. METHOD: Sixty-two patients (21 females and 41 males; mean [SD] age 20y [5y 1mo], range 15-29y) performed a clinical gait analysis. Self-selected walking speed, Gait Profile Score, and Gait Variable Score were calculated. Subjective gait perception was assessed with a visual analogue scale using the question: 'On a scale from 0 (worst) to 10 (optimal), how would you describe your walking today?'. A 6-minute walk test (6MWT) measured endurance; the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) evaluated quality of life. T-tests, Pearson correlations, and univariate and multiple linear regression models were used to compare and find associations between the data. RESULTS: Overall mean (SD) subjective gait perception was 7.5 (1.8) and was significantly higher for patients in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I (7.9 [1.5]) than for patients in GMFCS levels II and III (5.9 [2.0]). Positive correlations were found between subjective gait perception and gait scores, walking speed, 6MWT distance, and SF-36 score. Only walking speed was a significant predictor of subjective gait perception. INTERPRETATION: Subjective gait perception was influenced by GMFCS level and linked partially with the walking speed. The gait quality did not explain subjective gait perception. It is important to combine subjective and objective gait scores to develop personalized therapeutic goals. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Subjective gait perception is influenced by the physical impairment levels of patients with cerebral palsy. Subjective gait perception and objective gait scores are associated. Walking speed is the only predictor of gait perception.
AIM: To explore how patients with cerebral palsy (CP) perceive their gait and evaluate associations between subjective gait perception and: objective gait parameters, endurance, pain, and fatigue. METHOD: Sixty-two patients (21 females and 41 males; mean [SD] age 20y [5y 1mo], range 15-29y) performed a clinical gait analysis. Self-selected walking speed, Gait Profile Score, and Gait Variable Score were calculated. Subjective gait perception was assessed with a visual analogue scale using the question: 'On a scale from 0 (worst) to 10 (optimal), how would you describe your walking today?'. A 6-minute walk test (6MWT) measured endurance; the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) evaluated quality of life. T-tests, Pearson correlations, and univariate and multiple linear regression models were used to compare and find associations between the data. RESULTS: Overall mean (SD) subjective gait perception was 7.5 (1.8) and was significantly higher for patients in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I (7.9 [1.5]) than for patients in GMFCS levels II and III (5.9 [2.0]). Positive correlations were found between subjective gait perception and gait scores, walking speed, 6MWT distance, and SF-36 score. Only walking speed was a significant predictor of subjective gait perception. INTERPRETATION: Subjective gait perception was influenced by GMFCS level and linked partially with the walking speed. The gait quality did not explain subjective gait perception. It is important to combine subjective and objective gait scores to develop personalized therapeutic goals. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Subjective gait perception is influenced by the physical impairment levels of patients with cerebral palsy. Subjective gait perception and objective gait scores are associated. Walking speed is the only predictor of gait perception.
Authors: Beate Eltarvåg Gjesdal; S Mæland; B Bogen; K T Cumming; V C Nesse; S M R Torberntsson; C B Rygh Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2022-06-03