Kwanhyoung Lee1,2, Ara Kim1, Ki-Bae Hong3, Hyung Joo Suh4, Kyungae Jo4. 1. Doosan Corporation, Solus, Suwon 16229, Korea. 2. Department of Integrated Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea. 3. Dongduk Women's University, Seoul 02748, Korea. 4. BK21 Plus, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Polar fats present in the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM), together with cholesterol
and different proteins, are of nutritional and functional interest. The MFGM
consists of a complex mixture of protein, polar, and nonpolar lipids, which
constitute up to 90% of its dry weight (El-Loly, 2011). The most polar lipids in MFGM are phospholipids
[phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI),
and phosphatidylserine (PS)], and sphingolipids (SM) (Bourlieu et al., 2018). Polar lipids are a major component of the cell
membranes and are known to affect health as they play a fundamental role in cell
membrane function. Dairy phospholipids (PLs) have been shown to reduce cholesterol,
cardiovascular disease, inflammation and gastrointestinal infections, stress, and
cancer, and are also known to affect neuronal differentiation (Contarini and Povolo, 2013).The MFGMs containing polar lipids are released into the water phase by various
mechanical treatments, such as heating, stirring, homogenization, or aeration during
the manufacture of butter or cheese. Polar lipids in milk can be recovered from whey
(Price et al., 2018), a by-product of
cheese making, and butter serum (Rombaut et al.,
2006b), a by-product of butter making.Most of the recent commercial polar lipids are made from egg yolk and soybean. The
low content of PL in dairy products makes it difficult to extract and concentrate PL
at an industrial scale. Therefore, microfiltration and ultrafiltration are used to
separate polar lipids from dairy products in MFGM fragments and lipoprotein
particles. Polar lipids are easily separated from the serum phase by tangential
micro- and ultrafiltration techniques that involve addition of water in a step by
step manner to remove undesirable components, such as lactose, whey-proteins, and
minerals (dialysis filtration) (Gassi et al.,
2016). Supercritical fluid extraction has been reported to increase milk
polar lipid content by selective removal of neutral lipids (e.g., triglycerides). To
increase the polar lipid content of MFGM obtained through microfiltration, the use
of supercritical carbon dioxide was employed, which reduced the concentration of
neutral lipids from 21% to 4%, and the concentration of polar lipids
increased from 9.6% to 19.7% (Astaire
et al., 2003). However, these methods require a relatively high cost and
have limitations on equipment, which makes industrial access difficult (Price et al., 2018).Generally, for polar lipid extraction, it is suitable to use mixtures of hydrophobic
and hydrophilic solvents. Hydrophobic solvent hexane or chloroform and hydrophilic
solvent propanol or methanol are used (Le et al.,
2011; Rombaut et al., 2005).
Triglycerides require hydrophobic solvents for extraction, while amphiphilic polar
lipid can be effectively extracted with a mixture of hydrophobic and hydrophilic
solvents. However, non-polar solvents present a safety risk, and the use of
solvents, like methanol, in the production of food materials is inadequate. Thus, a
combination of water, preferably ethanol, is advantageous as a non-polar solvent and
a polar counterpart.Therefore, in this study, the extraction of butter serum and whey was evaluated to
select suitable raw materials for polar lipid extraction. In addition, the optimum
extraction process was established by comparing the polar lipid extraction rate
according to the ethanol concentration and solid content. Finally, component
analysis was performed and the anti-inflammatory activity of the polar lipids
produced by the optimal extraction process was measured.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of the milk phospholipid-enriched ingredient
To prepare the phospholipid-enriched component, butter serums powder A and B were
purchased from Corman (Limbourg, Belgium), and whey serum WPC60 and WPC70 were
purchased from Agropur Inc. (Saint-Hubert, Quebec, Canada). Polar lipids
extraction was performed using 85%, 90%, and 95% ethanol
solution (60 L), instead of water, and powdered butter serums or whey serums (10
kg). Extraction was performed for 5 h, with stirring at 80–100 rpm at
60°C. After extraction, the mixture was separated into filtrate and
precipitate using a 0.45 μm membrane filter (Whatman, Little Chalfont,
UK). The filtrate was concentrated using a forced thin-film evaporator (EYELA,
Tokyo, Japan). After concentration, the mixture was allowed to stand at
40°C for 30 min, and phospholipids and triacylglycerol were separated
into an upper layer and a lower layer. The upper layer was used as the enriched
polar lipid fraction.
Composition analysis
The dry matter content was measured by the hot air oven method (IDF, 2010). Total lipid content was
estimated gravimetrically using Röse-Gottlieb extraction (IDF, 1985). Protein content was measured
using the Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method (IDF, 2001), and by using a protein conversion factor of
6.38. The ash content of the sample was obtained by ingesting 5 g of the sample
at 550°C, cooling it to room temperature in a desiccator, and measuring
the weight. Lactose was analyzed by the AOAC method and HPLC (Zygmunt et al., 1982). High-pressure liquid
chromatography (HP 1100, Agilent, Massy, France) analysis was performed under
the following conditions: the column was an Econosphere NH2 column (5
μm, 250 mm×4.6 m; Alltech Associate, Deerfield, IL, USA), the
mobile phase comprised acetonitrile and water (75:25, v/v) at a flow rate of 1
mL/min and the column temperature was 35°C.
Phospholipid assay by HPLC
The HPLC- evaporative light-scattering detector (ELSD) analysis was carried out
using an HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) instrument equipped with two LC-10 Advp
pumps, SCL-10 Advp gradient system, DGU-14 Advp module degasser, and Rheodyne
manual injector with a 10 μL sample loop. The analytical column (150
mm×4.6 mm I.D. 3 μm) was packed with a silica normal-phase
Spherisob SIL (Waters Technologies, Milford, MA, USA). Chromatographic
separation was carried out using a linear binary gradient, according to the
following scheme, 0 min: 4% B, 4 min: 12% B, 12 min: 94% B,
and 17 min: 4% B. The total run time was 30 min per sample. Eluent A
consisted of chloroform and eluent B consisted of methanol and acetic
acid-triethylamine buffer (pH 4.5, acetic acid-triethylamine-water, 7.2/8.0/118,
v/v/v). The flow rate of the eluent was 0.5 mL/min. An ELSD 2000 (Alltech,
Deerfield, IL, USA) was used; the pressure of nebulizer gas (air) was maintained
at 2.2 bar, and the drift tube temperature was set at 100°C.
Rancimat test
Oxidation induction time was measured using Rancimat 743 (Metrohm, Herisau,
Switzerland), in accordance with Cha and Choi’s method (1990), to
determine the degree of rancidity upon heating of the whey protein concentrate
(WPC). The sample (3 g) was oxidized by injecting air at a rate of 20 L/h at
100°C. The experiment was repeated three times to determine the degree of
rancidity. In order to measure the oxidative stability of phospholipid from
whey, 5% of whey protein phospholipid (WPL) was added to docosahexaenoic
acid (DHA), and ASARCO oil (DSM Nutritional Products, Parsippany, NJ, USA), and
egg phospholipids were used as control samples.
The preparation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from E. coli
and L. plantarum
EVs were isolated from the culture supernatants of E. coli (KCTC
1039) and L. plantarum (KCTC 3108), as described previously
(Lee et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2015). Briefly, E.
coli and L. plantarum in nutrient broth was
cultured at 37°C and centrifuged twice at 10,000×g for 15 min.
Supernatants were filtered with a 0.22-μm vacuum filter. Then the
resulting filtrate was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 150,000×g for
3 h at 4°C (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). EVs were diluted in
PBS and stored at −80°C.
Anti-inflammatory effect of WPL
The murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7 was obtained from the Korea Cell Line
Bank (KCLB) and cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1%
penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were incubated at 37°C and 5%
CO2. The cell viability after WPL treatment was measured by MTT
assay. Inflammation was induced by treating RAW 264.7 cells with 1 μg/mL
of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from E. coli and 0.1–100
μg/mL of WPL for 24 h. Cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α secreted in the
culture medium were quantified using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN, USA). For the detection of anti-inflammatory activity, RAW
264.7 cells were seeded onto 12-well plate and treated with either 1
μg/mL of EV from E. coli along with 0.1–100
μg/mL of WPL, or 1 μg/mL of EV from Lactobacillus
plantarum and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The cytokines IL-6
and TNF-α secreted in the culture medium were quantified using an ELISA
Kit (R&D Systems).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated three times, and the results were expressed as
mean±SD. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 10.0 program
to determine the significance of each treatment (p<0.05) by using the
analysis of variance (ANOVA) along with Duncan’s multiple range test.
Results and discussion
Composition of butter serum and whey powder
Table 1 shows the results of the component
analysis of butter serum and whey powder, used as raw materials for the
preparation of polar lipids. The fat content of butter serum was 27.5%
and 12.5% for butter serum powder A and B, respectively, while WPC60 and
70 showed 25.3% and 20.3% fat, respectively. Butter serum powder
(A 38.4% and B 46.8%) had higher lactose content than whey (WPC60
1.2% and WPC70 1.5%).
Table 1.
Chemical composition of butter serum and whey serum
Index
Butter serum
Whey serum
Butter serum powder A
(%)
Butter serum powder B
(%)
WPC60 (%)
WPC70 (%)
Water
1.9
3.3
2.5
1.8
Total fat
27.5
12.5
25.3
20.3
Protein
26.0
28.5
62.5
72.2
Lactose
38.4
46.8
1.2
1.5
Ashes
5.8
7.0
3.0
3.3
WPC, whey protein concentrate.
WPC, whey protein concentrate.Milk PLs can be recovered from whey, or butter serum, the by-products of cheese,
or cream-making, respectively. In the production of butter, MFGM fragments
damaged by mechanical treatment are recovered in buttermilk or butter serum
(Vanderghem et al., 2010). The MFGM
fragments obtained as by-products of milk processing include PLs
(glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids), neutral lipids (triacylglycerols),
proteins, and glycoproteins (Dewettinck et al.,
2008; Lopez, 2011). Buttermilk
and butter serum has been reported to contain about 2 and 8 g/L of
phospholipids, respectively (Rombaut and
Dewettinck, 2006). According to a previous report (Boyd et al., 1999), commercial whey powders
contain high proportion of lactose, ash, and calcium, but contain low proportion
of protein and total lipids, and low protein-to-lipid ratios. The difference in
composition is due to differences in the manufacturing processes or in the
sources of whey.
Phospholipid content of the polar lipid-enriched fraction after ethanol
extraction from butter serum and whey powder
Phosphorus content of the polar lipid-enriched fraction, obtained by extracting
polar lipids from the by-products with alcohol, was measured (Table 2). The phospholipid content of the
enriched fraction obtained from butter serum (A 36.7% and B 45.1%)
was higher than that of whey powder (WPC60 30.5% and WPC70 31.0%).
The yields were 21.0% and 12.0% for butter serum A and B,
respectively, and 20.0% and 18.0% for WPC60 and WPC70,
respectively (Table 2). Due to its high
yield and phospholipid content, butter serum powder A was considered to be
suitable for the preparation of polar lipid-enriched fraction. Whey powder did
not have a detectable lactose content in the polar fraction, and the protein
content was lower than that of butter serum. Although WPC60 showed slightly
lower phospholipid content and yield, it was selected as a raw material for the
production of polar lipid-enriched fraction, in consideration of the economic
aspects. For the preparation of polar lipid fractions from MFGM fragments, it is
preferable to use butter serum (Rombaut et al.,
2006a) and whey (Rombaut et al.,
2007a), which contain no or low amounts of casein.
Table 2.
Phospholipid content of polar lipid-enriched fraction after ethanol
extraction from butter serum and whey serum
Serum
Butter serum powder A
(%)
Butter serum powder B
(%)
WPC60 (%)
WPC70 (%)
PL
36.7±1.8
45.1±3.5
30.5±1.8
31.0±0.9
Glycolipids
8.6±0.8
1.6±0.1
5.4±0.2
7.0±0.2
Lactose
5.1±1.3
7.5±0.9
ND
ND
Crude protein
7.6±0.6
9.7±0.9
5.0±0.6
5.4±0.4
Yield
21.0±1.1
12.0±0.8
20.0±0.9
18.0±0.6
Polar lipid-enriched fraction was obtained by adding 95%
ethanol 7 times to the serum during a 1 h extraction at
25°C.
WPC, whey protein concentrate; ND, not detected.
Polar lipid-enriched fraction was obtained by adding 95%
ethanol 7 times to the serum during a 1 h extraction at
25°C.WPC, whey protein concentrate; ND, not detected.
Optimal addition of whey powder for polar lipid production
The effect of ethanol extraction concentration with the change of the solids
content was measured to determine the ethanol concentration and the amounts of
solids for the extraction of polar lipids (Fig.
1). As the solid content of whey powder for extraction increased, the
amount of polar lipid extraction increased. As the water content in ethanol
increased, the content of polar lipids increased, and the phospholipid content
increased. The main lipids contained in the polar lipid fraction were SM and PE,
followed by PC (Fig. 1). The major
components of polar lipids that make up MFGM are phospholipids and sphingolipids
(mainly sphingomyelin, SM) (Mather, 2000;
Ye et al., 2002).
Fig. 1.
Lipid composition of polar lipids-enriched fraction from whey serum
(WPC60) with varying solid content.
WPC, whey protein concentrate.
Lipid composition of polar lipids-enriched fraction from whey serum
(WPC60) with varying solid content.
WPC, whey protein concentrate.In particular, the highest PL content previously reported in dairy products was
45.8% on a dry basis in whey protein extracted with 70% ethanol at
70°C treatment (Price et al.,
2018). According to the results presented in Fig. 1, the addition of 15.0% and 16.6% of
whey powder and the use of 85% alcohol as the extraction solvent are the
most suitable conditions for the extraction of 51.1% and 53.3% of
PL, respectively.
Lipid composition of polar lipids produced in the optimal process
After the selection of whey powder and extraction solvent, the extraction time
and temperature were determined to be 60°C and 30 min, respectively, to
establish an optimal process (data not shown). Fig. 2 shows an optimized extraction process for polar lipid WPL.
The optimal production process (Fig. 2)
yielded 40.26 kg of polar lipid product, WPL, using 200 kg of whey powder.
Fig. 2.
WPL manufacture process with polar lipid-enriched fraction from whey
serum.
WPC, whey protein concentrate; WPL, whey protein phospholipid.
WPL manufacture process with polar lipid-enriched fraction from whey
serum.
WPC, whey protein concentrate; WPL, whey protein phospholipid.The lipid composition of WPL is shown in Table
3. The polar lipid content was 38.6%, and PC, SM, and PE
showed 14.6%, 10.7%, and 10.1%, respectively. The PS and PI
were found in low levels, 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively (Table 3). Polar lipid WPL is composed of
phospholipids (mainly PC and PE) and sphingolipids (mainly SM). It also contains
small amounts of glycolipids (Cerebroside: 9.79 mg/g, LacCer: 5.50 mg/g, GM3:
0.88 mg/g, GD3: 1.35 mg/g) in Table
4.
Table 3.
Polar lipids composition of WPL as polar lipid-enriched fraction from
whey serum (WPC60)
Glycolipids composition of WPL as polarlipid-enriched fraction from
whey serum (WPC60)
Sample
Concentration
(μg/mg)
Cerebroside
LacCer
GM3
GD3
WPL
9.79±0.78
5.50±0.35
0.88±0.01
1.35±0.01
WPL, whey protein phospholipid; WPC, whey protein concentrate;
LacCer, Lactosylceramide; GM3, monosialoganglioside 3; GD3,
disialoganglioside 3.
WPC, whey protein concentrate; PS, phosphatidylserine; SM,
sphingomyelin; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE,
phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PL,
phospholipid.WPL, whey protein phospholipid; WPC, whey protein concentrate;
LacCer, Lactosylceramide; GM3, monosialoganglioside 3; GD3,
disialoganglioside 3.It has been reported that the concentration of polar lipids in crude oil is
between 9.4 and 35.5 mg/100 g. The main milkphospholipids are PE
(19.8%–42.0%, w/w), PC (19.2%–37.3%,
w/w), PS (1.9%–10.5%, w/w), and PI
(0.6%–11.8%, w/w) (Rombaut
et al., 2005; Rombaut and Dewettinck,
2006). The main milksphingolipids are GluCer
(2.1%–5.0%, w/w), LacCer (2.8%–6.7%,
w/w), and SM (18.0%–34.1%, w/w). Monosialoganglioside 3
(GM3) and disialoganglioside 3 (GD3) are the major glycolipids of milk and these
gangliosides have been reported to contain 0.14 to 1.10 mg/100 mL (Pan and Izumi, 2000). Analysis of polar
lipids of whey (Rombaut et al., 2007b), a
by-product of mozzarella cheese production, revealed the presence of
40.6% PE, 19.1% PC, and 15.7% SM. In addition, analysis of
LacCer content revealed a high level in lipids (8.5%). The content was
slightly different from that of WPL. This is likely due to differences in raw
milk and differences in the manufacturing process of whey obtained as a
by-product.
Rancimat test of WPL
In general, after induction, oil rapidly increases the oxygen absorption rate and
oxidation product. Accordingly, rancidity is caused by various physical and
chemical changes in oil. Therefore, when the induction time is long, it can be
said that the oxidation stability is excellent (Nam et al., 2007). In order to evaluate WPL oxidation stability, DHA
and WPL or ARASCO oil or egg phospholipids were mixed, and oxidation induction
time was measured by rancimat test (Fig.
3). The oxidation induction time is the time until the conductivity curve
reaches the inflection point. Induction times of DHA alone, DHA-ARSCO oil
mixture, and DHA-egg phospholipids oil mixture were 0.66 h, 1.91 h, and 4.20 h,
respectively. However, induction time was not measured in DHA and WPL oil
mixture.
Fig. 3.
Measurement of change in induction time by rancimat test with
addition of WPL.
WPL, whey protein phospholipid.
Measurement of change in induction time by rancimat test with
addition of WPL.
WPL, whey protein phospholipid.The oil mixture of DHA and WPL has a high induction time due to the effect of WPL
addition to DHA. There are many studies on the antioxidant properties of PL
(Jung et al., 2001; King et al., 1992; Segawa et al., 1995), and not only PL but especially PE and
PC can give excellent oxidation stability. This is because the primary amino
group of PE contained in polar lipid reacts with the reactive carbonyl produced
during heating to produce pyrolyzed phospholipids and heterocyclic moieties with
anti-oxidative properties. In addition, the amino groups of PE and PC can
promote hydrogen or electron donation to tocopherols (Ramadan et al., 2003). In the previous study, the sum of PE
and PC contents extracted from ethanol from whey protein was 32.4% and
21.1%, respectively, of 80% and 90% ethanol (Price et al., 2018). In this study, the sum
of PE and PC contents of polar lipid fraction extracted from WPL was
33.9%. Therefore, it was confirmed that the oxidation stability was
excellent due to the high content of PE and PC as well as PL.
Anti-inflammatory activity of WPL
The MTT assay was performed to determine the cytotoxicity of WPL in mouse
macrophages, RAW 264.7. Treatment with increasing concentrations of WPL did not
affect cell viability (Fig. 4). Therefore,
the subsequent experiments, performed with 100 μg/mL WPL, did not affect
the cell viability. This suggests that the anti-inflammatory effect of WPL is
not due to a decrease in cell viability, but due to the inherent activity of
WPL. Treatment with 0.1 μg/mL of EV for inducing inflammation in RAW
264.7 cells resulted in increased production of IL-6 and TNF. It was confirmed
that inflammation was caused by EV. However, when WPL was treated with
macrophages, IL-6 and TNF were hardly produced, indicating that WPL had no
inflammatory effect.
Fig. 4.
Effect of WPL on viability and inflammatory cytokine activity of RAW
264.7 cells.
RAW 264.7 cells (1×106 cells/mL) were pre-incubated for
24 h and were stimulated with EV (1 μg/mL) or WPL (0.1–100
μg/mL) for 24 h. Values are presented as the means±SD for
each group. WPL, whey protein phospholipid.
Effect of WPL on viability and inflammatory cytokine activity of RAW
264.7 cells.
RAW 264.7 cells (1×106 cells/mL) were pre-incubated for
24 h and were stimulated with EV (1 μg/mL) or WPL (0.1–100
μg/mL) for 24 h. Values are presented as the means±SD for
each group. WPL, whey protein phospholipid.During the inflammatory reactions, nitric oxide, TNF-α, and IL-6 are
produced, which play an important role in defense against early infection (Higuchi et al., 1990). Prokaryotic or
eukaryotic cells secrete EVs, and the secreted EVs have been reported to have
several functions. Extracellular vesicles secreted by gram-negative bacteria
contain lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and bacterial proteins. The EVs from
gram-negative bacteria are known to induce inflammatory diseases (Lee et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2009).Inflammatory cytokines play a significant role as indicators of inflammation.
Therefore, the effect of WPL on the production of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6
and TNF-α) induced by EVs from E. coli in RAW 264.7
cells was measured (Fig. 5). The EVs
produced by L. plantarum, having anti-inflammatory activity,
were used as a positive control, which decreased the production of IL-6 and
TNF-α. In addition, IL-6 and TNF-α increased upon treatment with
EVs from E. coli and decreased along with increasing
concentration of WPL. Thus, WPL was confirmed to have anti-inflammatory
activity. The effect of EVs from L. plantarum in the prevention
or inhibition of inflammation has already been reported in many studies (Kim et al., 2018; Molina-Tijeras et al., 2019).
Fig. 5.
Anti-inflammatory effect of WPL in RAW 264.7 cells.
Raw 264.7 cells (1×106 cells/mL) were pre-incubated for
24 h and were stimulated with EV (1 μg/mL) in the presence of WPL
(0.1–100 μg/mL) for 24 h. Values are presented as the
means±SD for each group. Different letters indicate significant
differences (p<0.05) among samples by Duncan’s multiple
range test. WPL, whey protein phospholipid.
Anti-inflammatory effect of WPL in RAW 264.7 cells.
Raw 264.7 cells (1×106 cells/mL) were pre-incubated for
24 h and were stimulated with EV (1 μg/mL) in the presence of WPL
(0.1–100 μg/mL) for 24 h. Values are presented as the
means±SD for each group. Different letters indicate significant
differences (p<0.05) among samples by Duncan’s multiple
range test. WPL, whey protein phospholipid.Phosphatidylserine, a type of polar lipid, has been reported to act as an
endogenous modulator of immune and anti-inflammatory responses (Gaitonde et al., 2011; Yamazaki et al., 1997). The anti-inflammatory effects of PC
and LysoPC on chronic inflammatory ulcerative colitis have also been reported
(Toekes et al., 2010). Milk fats containing a large amounts of MFGM have been
reported to have an anti-inflammatory effect on LPS-induced inflammation in the
gastrointestinal tract (Snow et al.,
2011). There are increasing reports on the regulation of inflammatory
responses and treatment of inflammatory diseases through PL intake.
Conclusion
In this study, a solvent extraction and fractionation process was developed to
concentrate polar lipids from whey and butter processing derived by-products. In
addition, it has been shown that the corresponding polar lipids can greatly
contribute to enhancing the oxidation stability of the functional polyunsaturated
fatty acids, represented by fish oil. It is believed that by investigating the
anti-inflammatory effects in macrophages, milk-derived polar lipids can be
effectively used for promoting intestinal health and alleviating inflammatory
diseases. Milk-derived polar lipids, unlike the commonly distributed plant-derived
polar lipids, contain substantial amounts of sphingomyelin, glycosyl-ceramide, and
phosphatidylserine. In the future, diverse innovations would be required, such as 1)
the development of an active material for topical product through conversion of
sphingomyelin and 2) the development of a cognitive functional product using
sphingomyelin and phosphatidylserine.
Authors: Puneet Gaitonde; Aaron Peng; Robert M Straubinger; Richard B Bankert; Sathy V Balu-Iyer Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: L C Zygmunt; E Anderson; B Behrens; R Bowers; M Bussey; G Cohen; M Colon; C Deis; P S Given; A Granade; C Harms; J C Heroff; D Hines; G W Hung; W J Hurst; J Keller; F B Laroche; W Luth; D McKay; T Mertle; M Navarre; R Rivera; R Scopp; F Scott; R Sherman; K Sloman; C Sodano; K D Trick; B R Vandine; N G Webb Journal: J Assoc Off Anal Chem Date: 1982-03