Literature DB >> 32161890

Effect of Pulpotomy Procedures With Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Dexamethasone on Post-endodontic Pain in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mona Bagheri1, Hussein Khimani2, Lida Pishbin3, Hassan Shahabinejad2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endodontic post-treatment pain continues to be one of the main problems encountered by dental professionals. Therefore, pain control during and after endodontic treatment is one of the most important issues in endodontics. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare postoperative pain relief achieved with dexamethasone (DEX) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) used as pulp coverage after pulpotomy in human molars with irreversible pulpitis.
METHODS: This prospective double-blind study was conducted on 54 patients complaining of dental pain due to irreversible pulpitis. The standard pulpotomy procedure was performed by the same dentist in all patients. At the time of the cotton pellet placement, patients were randomly divided into three groups: those in whom a sterile dry cotton (DC) pellet was used, patients treated with a cotton pellet soaked in MTA, and those who were treated with a cotton pellet soaked in DEX. After completion of the treatment, patients received rescue medication every 6 hours for the first day. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6-hour intervals for 24 hours, and then every day until day 7 using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: In general, patients treated with MTA suffered the lowest levels of pain at all time intervals. Post-pulpotomy pain was significantly reduced at 18 and 24 hours and from days 2 to 7 post-treatment in the MTA group. DEX lowered the pain level more than the DC pellet. However, the differences observed in the mean pain scores of the DEX and DC pellet groups at all-time intervals were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Pulpotomy procedures can reduce pain related irreversible pulpitis. Pulpotomy with MTA-soaked cotton pellet significantly reduces pain intensity in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Copyright:
© 2019 European Endodontic Journal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dexamethasone; irreversible pulpitis; mineral trioxide aggregate; postoperative endodontic pain; pulpotomy; visual analog scale

Year:  2019        PMID: 32161890      PMCID: PMC7006548          DOI: 10.14744/eej.2019.91885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Endod J        ISSN: 2548-0839


The goal of this prospective study was to compare postoperative pain after the clinical application of MTA, DEX, and DC in emergency pulpotomy procedures. Results of this study showed that the MTA-treated group reported less postoperative pain compared to both DEX and DC-treated groups at each time interval. The pain-relieving property of DEX was higher than DC and lower than that of MTA. Pulpotomy with a MTA-soaked cotton pellet significantly reduces pain intensity in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION

Pain of odontogenic origin has long been a source of fear and anxiety among the general population (1). It has also been a common source of frustration among dentists who have difficulties to alleviate their patient’s pain (2). Endodontic post-treatment pain continues to be a significant problem facing the dental profession (3). Therefore, pain control during and after endodontic treatment is one of the most important issues in endodontics. Consequently, inhibiting the post-treatment pain that affects both the patients and dentists is an important factor to consider when performing dental treatment. Endodontic pain is often an emergency situation that necessitates immediate treatment. It has been indicated that emergency pulpotomy is very effective in relieving acute dental pain caused by acute pulpitis. Irreversible pulpitis is the most common reason for performing endodontic treatment, characterized by prolonged sensitivity to cold or heat (4). Immediate postoperative pain is most likely to occur in patients with irreversible pulpitis following treatment. It has a high occurrence of 25%–40% (5). This pain is influenced by several factors, such as patient anxiety, pulpal status, existence of pre-treatment pain, and manipulation of periapical tissues (6). Many medications have been prescribed to relive pain in irreversible pulpitis. Opioid and non-opioid analgesics, benzo-diazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, or antibiotics, and even usage of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), have been prescribed in dentistry (7-10). Among the several treatment options, an emergency pulpotomy is the most reliable way to obtain pain relief in vital pulp cases (4). Mineral trioxide aggregate has attracted attention in the field of endodontics as a potential medicament for pulpotomy procedures, pulp capping, apexification, repair of root perforation, and repair of resorptive defects (11, 12). It also has favourable sealing ability, biocompatibility, and the ability to induce dentine bridge formation, along with cementum and periodontal ligament regeneration (13). The pain following endodontic therapy is often linked to the inflammatory process (14). Glucocorticoids inhibit the production by multiple cells or factors that are important in producing the inflammatory response (15). The post-pulpotomy pain-relieving effect of dexamethasone (DEX) as sedative dressing has not been evaluated previously. In addition, most of the studies involving MTA have only investigated its effect on dentine bridge formation rather than its analgesic effects. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the postoperative pain relief of DEX and MTA after pulpotomy in human permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis. Furthermore, the relationship between pre- and postoperative pain levels was also investigated. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference among the three pulp capping agents in terms of post-operative pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical statement

The research proposal was reviewed and confirmed by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. Patients involved in the study were formally informed, and each patient signed a consent form prior to enrollment. Consent form provided patient comprehensive information about the purposes and background of the study, clinical procedure, risks and discomfort, potential benefits, costs and payment, confidentiality, use and disclosure of health information, and subjects’ rights and freedom to quit from the study at any time. This prospective double-blind study was conducted on 54 patients who experienced dental pain due to irreversible pulpitis, which was determined based on clinical examination. Therapeutic interventions were performed by two different clinicians. All patients with a single painful and restorable molar indicating symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (i.e., a history of spontaneous pain for a few seconds to several hours, pain exacerbating with hot and cold fluids, radiating pain, or reproducible pain with cold testing) were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the following: patients who used analgesics for more than 1 day, patients taking antibiotics, patients with prior history of root canal therapy, tenderness to percussion, pulpal necrosis as diagnosed by thermal and electrical tests, evidence of periapical radiolucency, active systemic disease, moderate or severe marginal periodontitis, internal/external root resorption in periapical radiograph, patients whose tooth mobility was greater than Grade 1 and diffuse pulp chamber calcification. In this study, those teeth with no bleeding as an indicator of pulp vitality after access cavity preparation were also excluded. Pulpal diagnosis was determined by cold test and electric pulp test. Periapical diagnosis was based on percussion and palpation examination along with radiographic evaluation. A comprehensive clinical examination was also performed to rule out intra/extraoral swelling, the presence of a sinus tract, or other major pathology. The standard pulpotomy procedure was performed by the first dental practitioner for all the patients. Inferior alveolar nerve block (for mandibular teeth-2% Lidocaine 1:100.000 epinephrine carpules (Daroupakhsh, Tehran, Iran) and buccal infiltration (for maxillary teeth) were administered, the teeth were isolated with a rubber dam, caries were removed, and then the access cavities were prepared. After the removal of the coronal pulp tissue, the pulp chamber was irrigated with sterile saline solution and dried with sterile cotton pellets. Pulp covering and temporary restoration were performed by a second dental practitioner. At each treatment step and follow-up visit, clinical assessment of the treated tooth, which was only identified by a specified code, was carried out by two experienced dental practitioners who were blinded to the treatment groups. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1: sterile dry cotton (DC) pellet; Group 2: a cotton pellet soaked in white MTA (Proroot, USA). Group 3: 8 mg/2 ml DEX (Osveh, Iran). In the MTA group, the cotton pellet was prepared by soaking the pellet in diluted white MTA (3:1 liquid to powder ratio). After placing the cotton pellet in the pulp chamber, the access cavity was properly sealed with Coltosol (Ariadent, Iran). Patients were given postoperative forms that included instructions on rescue medication guidelines (400 mg Ibuprofen every 6 hours for the first 24 hours and then as needed. In case the patient was unable to take Ibuprofen, 500 mg acetominophen), and recording of the pain level score. Pain was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours and 2 to 7 days after treatment. An emergency telephone number was provided to patients to be able to report any possible problems. Treatment was rendered for patients who required any additional treatment, such as a pulpectomy; however, they were excluded from the study. Patients were contacted by phone daily and appointments for RCT were scheduled at the end of 7 days. Patients were asked to record their pain severity in the provided charts. After the 7th day, the patients handed in the completed charts, and an appointment was scheduled to complete the treatment procedure.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was done using the SPSS 20.0 software package. All data were expressed as ±1 standard deviation (SD). After testing for normality of pairwise differences with the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, the mean values of data were calculated, and statistical significance was determined with the analysis of variance to compare the effect of both sedative dressings on the severity of postoperative pain between the different groups. A P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were enrolled for this clinical trial. Forty-five patients (27 women and 18 men) completed the 7-day follow-up of the study. Nine patients left or were excluded from this study (Diagram 1). The demographic data of three groups of patients with irreversible pulpitis are presented in Table 1.
Diagram 1

CONSORT flow chart: Flow of patients through each stage. CONSORT=Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

TABLE 1

Demographic data of three groups

Group/NoGenderAge

MaleFemaleMeanRange
DC/15 cases4 (26.7%)11 (73.3%)30.47±10.1318-44
MTA/15 cases9 (60.0%)6 (40.0%)28.87±11.0319-52
DEX/15 cases5 (33.3%)10 (66.7%)26.07±5.6521-36
Total18 (40.0%)27 (60.0%)28.47±9.2119-52
Demographic data of three groups All patients reported their pain levels at 6-hour intervals for a period of 24 hours and then every 24 hours until day 7 after treatment. To compare the three therapeutic methods, the average VAS score was calculated for each patient at different time points. Pre-treatment VAS was as follows: 25% ≤5.5, 50% ≤7, 75% ≤8, and 25% ≥8 (Table 2). No significant differences in pre- and postoperative pain scores were seen among the three groups with respect to age, gender, and tooth location (P>0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). However, 24 hours after treatment and on days 6 and 7, female patients complained more of severe pain compared to male patients.
TABLE 2

Pre- and postoperative VAS for pain of all patients regardless of treatment

Time pointnMean±SDMinimumMaximumPercentiles

25th50th75th
Pre-operative VAS456.51±1.393.009.005.507.008.00
VAS6 hour454.02±2.800.009.002.004.006.00
VAS 12 hour453.02±2.580.007.000.003.005.00
VAS 18 hour452.31±2.380.007.000.002.004.00
VAS 24 hour451.93±2.240.008.000.002.003.00
VAS 2 day451.48±2.190.009.000.000.002.50
VAS 3 day451.48±1.980.009.000.000.003.00
VAS 4 day451.60±2.310.009.000.000.003.00
VAS day451.62±2.530.009.000.000.003.00
VAS 6 day451.46±2.370.009.000.000.002.00
VAS 7 day451.46±2.440.009.000.000.002.00
Pre- and postoperative VAS for pain of all patients regardless of treatment Regardless of the pulptomy procedure, the mean VAS for pain showed that pulpotomy was efficacious in reducing post-treatment pain in all patients with irreversible pulpitis (P<0.001) (Table 2). It was observed that the differences between the VAS scores of the three treatment methods were significant (P=0.014). In the group treated with MTA, the patients had no post-treatment severe pain at any time interval except at 6 (20% cases) and 12 (5% cases) hours postoperatively (Fig. 1). Severe pain was reported at all-time intervals by dry cotton- and DEX-treated patients (except 3 and 4 days post-treatment) (Figs. 2 and 3). The percentage of subjects reporting no or mild pain after the treatment period was 20%–100% for MTA-treated, 5%–95% for DEX-treated, and 16%–80% for DC-treated groups (Figs. 1–3).
Figure 1

Percentage of subjects in MTA group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval

Figure 2

Percentage of subjects in DC group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval

Figure 3

Percentage of subjects in DEX group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval

CONSORT flow chart: Flow of patients through each stage. CONSORT=Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Percentage of subjects in MTA group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval Percentage of subjects in DC group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval Percentage of subjects in DEX group who reported no, mild, moderate, or severe pre- and post-treatment pain at each time interval Visual analog scale for post-treatment pain in three groups at each time point Table 3 shows the mean and SDs values of the VAS scores for DC, DEX, and MTA at different time intervals. In general, the MTA treatment was associated with the lowest levels of endodontic pain or VAS for pain at all-time points. In the treatment groups, the differences of VAS was not statistically significant at 6 and 12 hours post-treatment (P>0.05) (Table 3). However, a statistically significant difference at 18 and 24 hours and 2–7 days post-treatment was found in the groups (Fig. 4). The DEX treatment was also associated with lower VAS levels compared with the DC-treated group (Table 3). However, no significant differences were observed in the mean pain scores of the two groups.
TABLE 3

Mean and standard deviation of pain intensity values or visual analog scale for treatment groups at each time point

POP/TreatmentDC Mean±DMTA Mean±SDDEX Mean±SDP
6 hour3.87±2.773.6±3.24.6±2.50.52
Range0-90-90-9
12 hour3.53±2.611.8±2.543.73±2.280.06
Range0-70-70-7
18 hour3.13±2.661.0±1.812.8±2.140.02
Range0-70-60-7
24 hour2.73±2.490.73±1 .622.33±2.120.01
Range0-80-60-7
2 Day2.26±2.650.33±0.91.86±2.230.016
Range0-90-30-7
3 Day2.53±2.410.73±1.431.2±1.610.03
Range0-90-50-4
4 Day2.86±3.040.8±1.651.13±1.500.03
Range0-90-60-4
5 Day3.0±2.970.2±0.411.66±2.630.003
Range0-90-10-8
6 Day2.4±2.990.4±1.051.60±2.320.02
Range0-90-30-9
7 Day2.40±2.990.53±1.551.46±2.350.026
Range0-90-60-9

DC: Dry cotton, MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, DEX: Dexamethasone, SD: Standard deviation, POP: Post-operative

Mean and standard deviation of pain intensity values or visual analog scale for treatment groups at each time point DC: Dry cotton, MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, DEX: Dexamethasone, SD: Standard deviation, POP: Post-operative

DISCUSSION

The primarily aim of this study was to determine and compare the post-pulpotomy pain-relieving the effect of administration of DEX and MTA as sedative dressings in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Furthermore, this study was designed to investigate the relationship between pre- and post-treatment pain levels in these patients. The control of postoperative endodontic pain continues to pose a significant challenge for dentists. Among various dental procedures, endodontic treatment is associated with more frequent and severe postoperative pain (16, 17). New strategies of pain management with optimal analgesic efficacy and minimum incidence of side effects are always needed to prevent and control the occurrence of postoperative endodontic pain. Pre-operative administration of some analgesics, such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen plus codeine has shown to reduce the onset of the postoperative pain (18). There are few studies evaluating oral administration of DEX to prevent and control postoperative endodontic pain (19, 20, 21). Furthermore, no studies have evaluated DEX pulp coverage to determine if an analgesic protocol to prevent and control the occurrence of postoperative endodontic pain can be established. This is the first study to evaluate the post-pulpotomy pain-relieving the effect of DEX, MTA, and DC (control group) as sedative dressings. The patients treated with these three protocols were followed to evaluate the level of postoperative pain and discomfort over a 7-day period of observation. Results of this study showed no significant differences in pre- and postoperative pain scores with respect to age, gender, and tooth location. These findings are similar to other studies (18, 22). Regardless of the type of material used for pulp coverage, results showed that preforming a pulpotomy is not only effective in alleviating pain, but also is an appropriate method for the endodontic emergency treatment in the patients with irreversible pulpitis (Table 1) (P<0.001). It has been demonstrated that the pulpotomy procedure is the most reliable way to obtain pain relief among all treatment procedure for patients with painful irreversible pulpitis (4). The goal of this prospective study was to compare postoperative pain after the clinical application of MTA, DEX, and DC for pain relief. Despite a number of factors influencing the patient’s reaction to pain, the use of the VAS in evaluating the severity of pain after endodontic treatment has been well established (23). Results of this study showed that MTA-treated group reported less postoperative pain and VAS in comparison to both DEX- and DC-treated groups at each time interval, thus rejecting the null hypothesis. The differences in VAS between the MTA-treated and DEX-treated groups were significant at all-time points except 6 and 12 hours after treatment. It has been shown that MTA stimulates cytokine release from bone cells, induces hard-tissue formation, has a dentinogenic effect on the pulp, exhibits antimicrobial properties, and has the ability to maintain pulp integrity after pulp capping and pulpotomy without cytotoxic effects when it is placed in contact with pulpal or periradicular tissue (24). It also promotes regeneration of pulp tissues that fulfills the purpose of pulpotomy treatment to maintain the treated tooth in a functional state (25). Microbial flora of infected root canals, host factors, and operative factors are the main contributing factors for postoperative pain and discomfort (26). The antibacterial properties of MTA and its ability to stimulate cytokine release may explain why the VAS for pain was lowest in the MTA-treated group compared to the DC- and DEX-treated group. The postoperative pain may also develop when the integrity of the periapical tissues is compromised. Irritation of periradicular tissues caused by local trauma, caustic irrigating solutions, or contamination during endodontic treatment may cause an acute inflammatory reaction, potentially leading to pain and/or swelling (27). Many chemical mediators (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, bradykinin, etc.) have been associated with the inflammatory process. The concentration of bradykinin, a potent pain mediator, was 13 times greater in teeth with irreversible pulpitis compared to the normal pulps (28). These chemical mediators cause pain at the site of inflammation (29). Pain can be induced indirectly by an increase in edema and tissue pressure, or directly through lowering the excitability threshold of the A-delta and C-fibers (18). DEX is a steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that inhibits phospholipase A2 and consequently reduces the amount of chemical mediators, decreasing the polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis (30). However, it has been shown that the administration of DEX leads to a partial inhibition of development of inflammatory periapical lesion. In comparison with the DC-treated group, DEX was not able to significantly reduce pain intensity at any time interval. It has been suggested in previous oral pain studies that the absorption and distribution of the medication occur before the initiation of surgical tissue damage and consequent production of inflammatory mediators to provide analgesia to patients before endodontic treatment is started (18).

CONCLUSION

Pulpotomy procedures can reduce pain related irreversible pulpitis. Pulpotomy with MTA-soaked cotton pellet significantly reduces pain intensity in patients with irreversible pulpitis undergo pulpotomy.
  29 in total

Review 1.  The use of mineral trioxide aggregate in clinical and surgical endodontics.

Authors:  Arnaldo Castellucci
Journal:  Dent Today       Date:  2003-03

2.  A study of the comparative efficacy of four common analgesics in the control of postsurgical dental pain.

Authors:  S Habib; R W Matthews; C Scully; B G Levers; J P Shepherd
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1990-11

3.  Effect of preoperative ibuprofen on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Mark Oleson; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Etodolac versus dexamethasone effect in reduction of postoperative symptoms following surgical endodontic treatment: a double-blind study.

Authors:  Shaul Lin; Liran Levin; Omri Emodi; Imad Abu El-Naaj; Micha Peled
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-04-17

5.  Tissue levels of immunoreactive substance P are increased in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Walter R Bowles; John C Withrow; Allen M Lepinski; Kenneth M Hargreaves
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Effect of supraperiosteal injection of dexamethasone on postoperative pain.

Authors:  Payman Mehrvarzfar; Behnam Shababi; Reza Sayyad; Arjang Fallahdoost; Khadije Kheradpir
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.659

7.  Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following complete instrumentation.

Authors:  M Torabinejad; J J Cymerman; M Frankson; R R Lemon; J D Maggio; H Schilder
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Comparison of preoperative pain and medication use in emergency patients presenting with irreversible pulpitis or teeth with necrotic pulps.

Authors:  John M Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-08

9.  Evaluation of pretreatment analgesia and endodontic treatment for postoperative endodontic pain.

Authors:  Sayeed Attar; Walter R Bowles; Michael K Baisden; James S Hodges; Scott B McClanahan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Prevalence of referred pain with pulpal origin in the head, face and neck region.

Authors:  Siamak Mardani; Mohammad Jafar Eghbal; Maryam Baharvand
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2008-04-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dexamethasone Increases the Anesthetic Success in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franco-de la Torre; Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez; Nicolás Addiel Serafín-Higuera; Ángel Josabad Alonso-Castro; Sandra López-Verdín; Nelly Molina-Frechero; Vinicio Granados-Soto; Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.