| Literature DB >> 32161749 |
Shuai Liu1,2, Xiaojie Zeng1,2, Dongqing Liu1, Shuwei Wang1,2, Lihan Zhang1,2, Rui Zhao1,2, Feiyu Kang1,2, Baohua Li1.
Abstract
The role of conductive carbon additive on the electrode/electrolyte interface formation mechanism was examined in the low-potential (3.0-0 V) and high-potential (3.0-4.7 V) regions. Here the most commonly used conductive carbon Super P was used to prepared electrode with polyvinylidene fluoride binder without any active material. The dynamic process of interface formation was observed with in situ Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. The electronically insulating electrode/electrolyte passivation layer with areal heterogeneity was formed after cycles in both potential regions. The low-potential interface layer is mainly composed of inorganic compounds covering the conductive carbon surface; While the electrode after high-potential sweep tends to lose its original carbon structure and has more organic species formed on its surface.Entities:
Keywords: conductive carbon additive; electrode/electrolyte interface; lithium-ion batteries; scanning electrochemical microscopy; solid electrolyte interface (SEI)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161749 PMCID: PMC7052374 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1(A) Cyclic voltammetry of the SECM probe in 1 M LiPF6 in EC:DMC:DEC (1:1:1 by vol.%) electrolyte with 10 mM ferrocene at scan rate of 10 mV/s. (B) SECM feedback mode over an conductive substrate (positive feedback) and insulating substrate (negative feedback). (C) SECM approach curve toward the Super P electrode at step size of 2 μm.
Figure 2(A) Cyclic voltammetry of Super P electrode from 3.0 to 0 V vs. Li+/Li in electrolyte of 1M LiPF6 in EC:DMC:DEC at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. (B) Normalized approach curves toward electrode at pristine, after 3rd, 6th, and 10th cycles. (C) SECM area scan with normalized current density of the electrode at pristine, after 6 and 10th cycles. (D) SECM feedback current converted topography of the scanned area. (E) SECM area scan with the topography induced feedback current subtracted for the 6 and 10th cycle.
Figure 3(A) Cyclic voltammetry of Super P electrode from 3.0 to 4.7 V vs. Li+/Li in electrolyte of 1 M LiPF6 in EC:DMC:DEC at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. (B) Normalized approach curves toward electrodes at pristine, after 5, 10, and 20th cycles. (C) SECM area scan with normalized current density of electrodes at pristine, and after 10 and 20th cycles. (D) SECM feedback current converted topography of the scanned area. (E) SECM area scan with the topography feedback current subtracted for the 10 and 20th cycle.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy images of carbon black electrode (a,b) at pristine state, (c,d) after cycles in the low-potential and (e,f) high-potential regions.
Element concentration on the surface of electrodes after cycling in the low-potential and high-potential regions.
| 0–3 V | 9.35 | 7.36 | 38.45 | 44.85 |
| 3–4.7V | 30.02 | 6.33 | 31.54 | 31.76 |
Figure 5XPS characterization of electrodes: C1s, O1s, and F1s spectra of the electrodes cycled in the potential window of 0–3 V (A) and 3.0–4.7 V (B).