| Literature DB >> 32161730 |
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to analysis the effects of treadmill training on gait function in children with cerebral palsy. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Investigating the effects of treadmill training on gait endurance, gait speed, limb support time, cadence, and step length in children with cerebral palsy. Similar outcomes were pooled by calculating the standardized mean difference. Of the eight studies, 179 participants were included. The average PEDro score was 6.25/10. The results of the sensitivity test for bias evaluation using the duval and tweedie's trim and fill method showed low publication bias. The test regarding the effect of treadmill training on overall gait function yielded a moderate effect size of 0.53, which was a statistically significant effect as its confidence interval did not include. The overall effect size of gait endurance was 0.85. The overall effect size of gait speed and limb support time were 0.52 and 0.73. The overall effect size of cadence and step length were 0.14 and 0.21, indicating a nonsignificant improvement. These findings suggested that treadmill training on cerebral palsy was effective for gait endurance, gait speed and limb support time than cadence and step length.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Gait function; Meta-analysis; Treadmill training
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161730 PMCID: PMC7056486 DOI: 10.12965/jer.1938748.374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
Fig. 1Eligibility and data-synthesis PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram.
Study characteristics
| Study | Group | No. of participants Intervention | Sex (male/female) | Age (yr), mean±SD | Cerebral palsy type GMFCS | Dosage | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 7 | 5/2 | 8.5±2.6 | Athetoid quadriplegia 4 | 30 min 2 day×6 wk | 10 MWT | |
| Control | 7 | 5/2 | 9.5±2.9 | Athetoid quadriplegia 4 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 4 | 2/2 | 4.5±2 | Spastic diplegia 4 | 20 min 2 or 3 day×12 wk | Gait speed | |
| Control | 4 | 4/0 | 4.5±2 | Spastic diplegia 4 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 12 | 6/6 | 10.3±3.1 | Not report | 30 min 2 day×9 wk | 10 MWT | |
| Control | 14 | 9/5 | 11.2±4.1 | Not report | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 15 | 10/5 | 11.9±1.1 | Spastic hemiplegia 15 | 15 min 3 day×12 wk | Gait speed | |
| Control | 15 | 6/9 | 11.2±1.1 | Spastic hemiplegia 15 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 14 | 7/7 | 9.7±2.2 | Spastic diplegia 8 | 30 min 5 day×12 wk | Spasticity | |
| Control | 12 | 7/5 | 9.6±2.4 | Spastic diplegia 4 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 11 | 6/5 | 15.9±2 | Spastic diplegia 9 | 30 min 3 day×12 wk | GMFM | |
| Control | 11 | 7/4 | 16±1.6 | Spastic diplegia 10 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 16 | 6/10 | 6.8±2.6 | Not report | 30 min 2 day×7 wk | 6 MWT | |
| Control | 17 | 9/8 | 6.0±1.5 | Not report | |||
|
| |||||||
| Experimental | 10 | Not report | 12±4 | Spastic diplegia 8 | 23 min 3 day×9 wk | Gait speed | |
| Control | 10 | Not report | 12±4 | Spastic diplegia 8 | |||
SD, standard deviation; GMFCS, gross motor function classification scale; PBWSTT, partial body weight supported treadmill training; 10MWT, 10-min walking test; 10-MWT, 10-m walking test; TBWS, treadmill training with body weight support; SSTTEP, supported speed treadmill training exercise program; GMFM, gross motor function measure; PODCI, pediatric outcomes data collection instrument; TGT, treadmill gait training; 6 MWT, 6-min walking test; BBS, Berg balance scale; PBWSTT, partial body weight supported treadmill training; SFA, school function assessment travel scale; TUG, Timed Up and Go test; MAS, modified Ashworth scale; BDTT, backward downhill treadmill training.
Quality assessment (PEDro scale)
| Study | Item | Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| √ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| √ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| √ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| √ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| √ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| √ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| √ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| √ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
PEDro, physiotherapy evidence database; 1, eligibility criteria; 2, random allocation; 3, concealed allocation; 4, baseline comparability; 5, blinded subjects; 6, blinded therapists; 7, blinded assessors; 8, adequate follow-up; 9, intention to treat; 10, between group; 11, point estimators.
Publication bias
| Value | Study | Point estimate | 95% CI | Q-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | - | 0.52 | 0.19–0.85 | 22.82 |
| Adjusted | 0 | 0.52 | 0.19–0.85 | 22.82 |
CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 2Combined effect size of treadmill training. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3Effect size at gait endurance. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 4Effect size at gait speed. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5Effect size limb support time. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 6Effect size at cadence. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 7Effect size at step length. CI, confidence interval.