| Literature DB >> 32161551 |
Mehdi Keddar1,2, Thibaut Muylle2,3, Emmanuelle Carrie1,2, Pierre Trefois3, Maxime Nachit2,4, Ralph Crott5, Claudine Christiaens6, Bert Bammens6,7, Michel Jadoul1,2, Eric Goffin1,2, Johann Morelle1,2.
Abstract
Fat accumulation in skeletal muscle was recently established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population, but its relevance for patients with kidney failure is unknown. Here we examined the potential association between muscle radiation attenuation (MRA), a non-invasive indicator of fat deposits in muscle, and cardiovascular events in patients with kidney failure treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and investigated dynamic changes and determinants of MRA in this population. We retrospectively assessed MRA on computed tomography images collected yearly in 101 incident patients with kidney failure starting PD between January 2006 and December 2015. After a median of 21 months on dialysis, 34 patients had 58 non-fatal cardiovascular events, and 22 patients had died. Baseline MRA was associated with cardiovascular events during time on dialysis, and patients with higher MRA (reflecting lower amounts of fat in muscle) showed a reduced incidence of CVD, independently of traditional risk factors (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97, P = 0.006). Multivariate regression analysis identified old age, female gender, visceral fat area, and low residual urine volume as independent determinants of MRA. As compared with reference values from a healthy population, patients with kidney failure had lower MRA (i.e., increased fat accumulation), independently of age, gender, and body-mass index. The subset of patients who underwent kidney transplantation showed a significant increase in MRA after restoration of kidney function. These observations expand the association between ectopic fat accumulation and CVD to the population on dialysis, and suggest that kidney failure is reversibly associated with fatty muscle infiltration.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; end-stage kidney disease; myosteatosis; peritoneal dialysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161551 PMCID: PMC7053428 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Baseline characteristics.
| Characteristic | Cohort | No CVD event | ≥1 CVD event | |
| Female gender— | 34 (34) | 21 (31) | 13 (38) | 0.5 |
| Age at ESKD—years | 56 ± 18 | 53 ± 19 | 62 ± 13 | 0.004 |
| Ethnicity— | 0.4 | |||
| Caucasian | 94 (93) | 62 (93) | 32 (94) | |
| Asian | 3 (3) | 3 (4) | 0 (0) | |
| African | 4 (4) | 2 (3) | 2 (6) | |
| Cause of ESKD— | 0.003 | |||
| Glomerulonephritis | 35 (35) | 28 (42) | 7 (21) | |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 19 (19) | 5 (7) | 14 (41) | |
| Interstitial nephritis | 10 (10) | 7 (10) | 3 (9) | |
| Hypertension/renal vascular disease | 10 (10) | 6 (8) | 4 (12) | |
| Polycystic kidney disease | 6 (6) | 3 (5) | 3 (9) | |
| Miscellaneous/unknown | 21 (20) | 18 (27) | 3 (8) | |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 5.6 ± 2.6 | 5.2 ± 2.7 | 6.3 ± 2.3 | 0.03 |
| Davies comorbidity index | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 0.002 |
| Hypertension— | 82 (81) | 50 (74) | 32 (94) | 0.02 |
| Diabetes— | 31 (31) | 13 (19) | 18 (53) | 0.001 |
| History of CHF— | 7 (7) | 5 (7) | 2 (6) | 0.8 |
| History of CHD— | 12 (12) | 5 (7) | 7 (21) | 0.05 |
| Kidney transplant waiting list— | 60 (59) | 44 (66) | 16 (47) | 0.07 |
| Drug therapy | ||||
| ACEi— | 50 (50) | 29 (43) | 21 (62) | 0.08 |
| ARB— | 35 (35) | 22 (33) | 13 (38) | 0.6 |
| Beta-blockers— | 39 (39) | 21 (31) | 18 (53) | 0.04 |
| Corticosteroids— | 15 (15) | 8 (12) | 7 (21) | 0.3 |
| Statins— | 58 (57) | 33 (49) | 25 (74) | 0.02 |
| Oral antidiabetic agent— | 7 (7) | 4 (6) | 3 (9) | 0.6 |
| Insulin— | 19 (19) | 6 (9) | 13 (38) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index—kg/m2 | 25.3 ± 4.7 | 24 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 | 0.003 |
| Systolic BP—mmHg | 140 ± 25 | 140 ± 27 | 140 ± 22 | 0.9 |
| Diastolic BP—mmHg | 82 ± 14 | 82 ± 15 | 82 ± 12 | 0.9 |
| Plasma hsCRP—mg/dL | 2.2 ± 3.9 | 1.6 ± 2.8 | 3.4 ± 5.3 | 0.04 |
| HDL-cholesterol—mg/dL | 47 ± 16 | 48 ± 17 | 45 ± 15 | 0.4 |
| Triglycerides—mg/dL | 159 ± 89 | 165 ± 96 | 148 ± 77 | 0.4 |
| Residual kidney function— | 97 (96) | 65 (97) | 32 (94) | 0.5 |
| Residual urine volume—mL/day | 1539 ± 695 | 1542 ± 682 | 1534 ± 733 | 0.9 |
| Parameters of peritoneal transport | ||||
| Net UF 3.86% glucose—mL/4 h | 494 ± 339 | 507 ± 297 | 464 ± 431 | 0.7 |
| D/Pcreat at 4 h | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.5 |
| Albumin loss—mg/4 h | 1095 ± 446 | 1083 ± 507 | 1114 ± 339 | 0.5 |
| Automated PD— | 56 (55) | 27 (40) | 18 (53) | 0.2 |
| Fat distribution and body composition | ||||
| Subcutaneous fat area—cm2 | 143 ± 88 | 132 ± 72 | 166 ± 114 | 0.4 |
| Visceral fat area—cm2 | 118 ± 86 | 109 ± 79 | 140 ± 96 | 0.2 |
| Skeletal muscle index—cm2 | 51 ± 9 | 51 ± 9 | 51 ± 8 | 0.9 |
| Muscle radiation attenuation—HU | 36 ± 12 | 38 ± 12 | 31 ± 11 | 0.006 |
FIGURE 1Fat distribution and the risk of CVD events in patients with kidney failure. Representative images of CT scan of the abdomen and analysis of fat distribution and muscle radiation attenuation (MRA) obtained at dialysis initiation from three male patients, matched for age, body-mass index, and residual urine volume. Age at CT scan was 52, 49, and 52-year-old; and body-mass index, 20.0, 21.4, and 19.4 kg/m2, for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Urine output was > 1000 ml/day in all three patients. Despite similar clinical characteristics, mean MRA was 50.4, 50.9, and 22.7 HU, in patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Patient 3 presented cardiovascular disease (CVD) events during follow-up, in contrast to patients 1 and 2, who did not.
Cox proportional hazard ratios for the time to first CVD event based on traditional risk factors and MRA at dialysis start.
| Unadjusted | Adjusted* | |||||
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||
| Age—years | 1.03 | 1.01, 1.05 | 0.008 | 0.99 | 0.95, 1.03 | 0.6 |
| HDL-cholesterol—mg/dL | 0.99 | 0.97, 1.01 | 0.2 | 0.98 | 0.95, 1.01 | 0.2 |
| Hypertension | 4.77 | 1.14, 19.94 | 0.03 | 7.46 | 1.36, 40.87 | 0.02 |
| Diabetes | 3.02 | 1.53, 5.99 | 0.002 | 2.31 | 0.85, 6.27 | 0.1 |
| CHD history | 2.79 | 1.21, 6.42 | 0.02 | 2.01 | 0.61, 6.59 | 0.3 |
| Body-mass index—kg/m2 | 1.09 | 1.02, 1.15 | 0.005 | 0.90 | 0.79, 1.02 | 0.09 |
| Urine volume—mL | 1.00 | 1.00, 1.00 | 0.9 | 1.00 | 1.00, 1.00 | 0.05 |
| Plasma hsCRP—mg/dL | 1.12 | 1.05, 1.19 | <0.001 | 1.18 | 1.06, 1.32 | 0.003 |
| MRA—HU | 0.94 | 0.91, 0.98 | 0.004 | 0.91 | 0.86, 0.97 | 0.006 |
FIGURE 2Longitudinal changes in muscle radiation attenuation during time on dialysis. (A) Individual changes (gray thin lines) and mean values (red thick line) of MRA during time on dialysis. (B) Mean (± SD) values of MRA during the first, second, and third years on dialysis (*P = 0.03 for linear trend, one-way ANOVA). (C,D) Illustrative longitudinal data of fat distribution, residual kidney function, and serum p-cresyl sulfate levels from two individuals on long-term PD: a 39-year-old woman on PD for 4 years (patient 1) and a 66-year-old man on PD for 5 years (patient 2). In both patients, a significant decrease in mean MRA (from 37.0 to 24.0 HU in patient 1 and from 37.6 to 27.2 HU in patient 2) paralleled the loss in residual function and accumulation of circulating p-cresyl sulfate.
Determinants of MRA in patients with kidney failure treated with PD.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| Coeff. | 95% CI | Coeff. | 95% CI | |||
| Age—years | –0.36 | −0.46, −0.26 | <0.001 | –0.20 | −0.34, −0.06 | 0.004 |
| Female gender | –4.86 | −9.63, −0.08 | 0.05 | –6.60 | −10.20, −3.00 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes | –6.68 | −11.66, −1.70 | 0.009 | 3.14 | −1.26,7.54 | 0.2 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | –2.09 | −2.81, −1.36 | <0.001 | –0.69 | −1.56,0.19 | 0.1 |
| Visceral fat area—cm2 | –0.05 | −0.07, −0.03 | <0.001 | –0.05 | −0.07, −0.02 | <0.001 |
| Serum albumin g/L | 0.31 | 0.03,0.59 | 0.03 | 0.24 | −0.02,0.50 | 0.07 |
| Urine volume—mL | 2.66×10−3 | 0.003 | 2.23×10−3 | 0.02 | ||
| Time on dialysis | ||||||
| Year 1 | 1.00( | − | − | 1.00( | − | − |
| Year 2 | –1.84 | −4.29,0.61 | 0.1 | 0.81 | −1.24,2.85 | 0.4 |
| Year 3 | –4.32 | −7.13, −1.51 | 0.003 | 0.22 | −2.82,3.26 | 0.9 |
| Year 4 | –3.05 | −6.08, −0.02 | 0.05 | –0.27 | −3.43,2.88 | 0.9 |
| Constant | 45.39 | 33.24,57.24 | <0.001 | |||
FIGURE 3Relationship between muscle radiation attenuation, gender, age, and body-mass index in patients with kidney failure, and comparison with patients with normal kidney function. Relationship between MRA and age (A), and MRA and body-mass index (BMI) (B), among male (red) and female (blue) patients with ESKD. Regression lines between MRA and age, and MRA and BMI in patients with ESKD (continuous lines) are compared with those from reference values obtained in patients with normal kidney function (dotted lines) (van der Werf et al., 2018).
FIGURE 4Dynamic changes in muscle radiation attenuation after kidney transplantation. Changes in MDRD-estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (A) and MRA (B) after kidney transplantation. Mean (±SD) MRA increased from 32.0 (±3.9) to 38.8 (±7.3) HU after transplantation (median of differences 5.41, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, exact P = 0.009). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.