Literature DB >> 32161433

A New Silicon Sling Device for Traction During Robotic Gynecologic Surgery.

Seiji Mabuchi1, Yuri Matsumoto2, Sho Matsubara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges of robotic gynecologic surgery is the appropriate traction of the organs and other structures surrounding the surgical field.
METHODS: We developed a novel traction device, VESOPASTA, that can be used for organ traction during robotic gynecologic surgery. This study describes the utility and the safety of the use of VESOPASTA for ureteral traction during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in five cervical cancer patients.
RESULTS: Ureteral suspension was successfully and safely performed using VESOPASTA during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients without causing any complications. The average time required for this procedure was less than 5 min.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel device, VESOPASTA, which can be used for organ traction during robotic surgery. This new device allows easy ureteral traction, facilitate the identification of ureter and prevent ureteral injuries during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
© 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Robotic surgery; Silicone sling; Tissue traction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32161433      PMCID: PMC7028317          DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D A Park; D H Lee; S W Kim; S H Lee
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Retraction Devices for Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Armando Vargas-Palacios; Claire Hulme; Thomas Veale; Candice L Downey
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Saskia Eklind; Anna Lindfors; Per Sjöli; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.

Authors:  Jennifer Bergstrom; Alessia Aloisi; Shannon Armbruster; Ting-Tai Yen; Jvan Casarin; Mario M Leitao; Edward J Tanner; Rayna Matsuno; Karime Kalil Machado; Sean C Dowdy; Pamela T Soliman; Stephanie L Wethington; Rebecca L Stone; Kimberly L Levinson; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Rene Pareja; Aldo Lopez; Marcelo Vieira; Reitan Ribeiro; Alessandro Buda; Xiaojian Yan; Yao Shuzhong; Naven Chetty; David Isla; Mariano Tamura; Tao Zhu; Kristy P Robledo; Val Gebski; Rebecca Asher; Vanessa Behan; James L Nicklin; Robert L Coleman; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ureteral suspension facilitates surgery for deep pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  Franco Alessandri; Davide Lijoi; Emanuela Mistrangelo; Simone Ferrero; Nicola Ragni; Valentino Remorgida
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Farr R Nezhat; M Shoma Datta; Connie Liu; Linus Chuang; Konstantin Zakashansky
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.