| Literature DB >> 32161133 |
Chiheng Chu1, Qianhong Zhu1, Zhenhua Pan2, Srishti Gupta3, Dahong Huang1, Yonghua Du4, Seunghyun Weon1, Yueshen Wu5, Christopher Muhich3, Eli Stavitski4, Kazunari Domen2,6, Jae-Hong Kim7.
Abstract
Redox cocatalysts play crucial roles in photosynthetic reactions, yet simultaneous loading of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts often leads to enhanced charge recombination that is detrimental to photosynthesis. This study introduces an approach to simultaneously load two redox cocatalysts, atomically dispersed cobalt for improving oxidation activity and anthraquinone for improving reduction selectivity, onto graphitic carbon nitride (C3N4) nanosheets for photocatalytic H2O2 production. Spatial separation of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts was achieved on a two-dimensional (2D) photocatalyst, by coordinating cobalt single atom above the void center of C3N4 and anchoring anthraquinone at the edges of C3N4 nanosheets. Such spatial separation, experimentally confirmed and computationally simulated, was found to be critical for enhancing surface charge separation and achieving efficient H2O2 production. This center/edge strategy for spatial separation of cocatalysts may be applied on other 2D photocatalysts that are increasingly studied in photosynthetic reactions.Entities:
Keywords: 2D photocatalyst; hydrogen peroxide; single-atom catalyst; spatially separated cocatalysts
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161133 PMCID: PMC7104179 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913403117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A) Randomly loading two cocatalysts leads to detrimental sequences of reactions involving oxidant (Ox) and reductant (Red). (B) Core/shell structured photocatalysts and (C) photocatalysts with different exposed crystalline facets to achieve controlled spatial separation of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts. (D) Spatial separation of Co single atom (as oxidation center) and AQ (as reduction center) cocatalysts by anchoring them in the center (i.e., pyridinic N) and on the edge (i.e., primary/secondary amine N) of 2D ultrathin C3N4, respectively.
Fig. 2.(A and B) HRTEM and EDS images of Co1/AQ/C3N4. (C) Photooxidative deposition of Mn on Co1/C3N4. (D and E) HAADF-STEM image of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (F) FT-IR spectra of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (G) Photoreductive deposition of Au on AQ/C3N4.
Fig. 3.(A) FT EXAFS spectra of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. The intensity of Co3O4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 was normalized to the same maximum of Co foil to facilitate the comparison of radical distances by multiplying with a factor of 2.1 and 3.6, respectively. (B) Fit of Co1/AQ/C3N4 EXAFS spectra using Co foil and Co3O4. (Inset) Corresponding K-space curves. (C) Normalized XANES of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. (D) Binding energy of N 1s, C 1s, P 2p, and O 1s for ultrathin C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 by high-resolution XPS.
Fig. 4.(A) Time course of O2 evolution measured under 0.6-kPa Ar pressure and 300-W xenon lamp irradiation with 0.5 g/L of catalyst, 1 g/L La2O3, and 20 mM AgNO3 in 100 mL water. (B) Selectivity of H2O2 production. (C and D) Time course of H2O2 production measured under simulated sunlight irradiation (xenon lamp solar simulator, 100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5G) with 0.5 g/L of catalyst under O2-saturated condition. Solid lines are the fitting result of the kinetic model. Dotted lines are H2O2 productions estimated assuming additive enhancement of each cocatalyst. (E and F) H2O2 formation and decomposition rate constants. Error bars represent the SDs of triplicates.
Fig. 5.Density of states computed with DFT for (A) C3N4, (B) C3N4 loaded with Co single atom cocatalyst (SAC), (C) C3N4 loaded with Co nanoparticle (showing Co4 as an example), and (D) Co loaded with AQ.
Fig. 6.(A) Steady-state PL emission spectra (excitation at 375 nm) of C3N4, Conano/AQ/C3N4, and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (B) TRPL spectra monitored for entire emission between 400 and 800 nm. The curves were fitted to the equation y = y0 + A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + A3 exp(−t/τ3).