Literature DB >> 32161133

Spatially separating redox centers on 2D carbon nitride with cobalt single atom for photocatalytic H2O2 production.

Chiheng Chu1, Qianhong Zhu1, Zhenhua Pan2, Srishti Gupta3, Dahong Huang1, Yonghua Du4, Seunghyun Weon1, Yueshen Wu5, Christopher Muhich3, Eli Stavitski4, Kazunari Domen2,6, Jae-Hong Kim7.   

Abstract

Redox cocatalysts play crucial roles in photosynthetic reactions, yet simultaneous loading of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts often leads to enhanced charge recombination that is detrimental to photosynthesis. This study introduces an approach to simultaneously load two redox cocatalysts, atomically dispersed cobalt for improving oxidation activity and anthraquinone for improving reduction selectivity, onto graphitic carbon nitride (C3N4) nanosheets for photocatalytic H2O2 production. Spatial separation of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts was achieved on a two-dimensional (2D) photocatalyst, by coordinating cobalt single atom above the void center of C3N4 and anchoring anthraquinone at the edges of C3N4 nanosheets. Such spatial separation, experimentally confirmed and computationally simulated, was found to be critical for enhancing surface charge separation and achieving efficient H2O2 production. This center/edge strategy for spatial separation of cocatalysts may be applied on other 2D photocatalysts that are increasingly studied in photosynthetic reactions.
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D photocatalyst; hydrogen peroxide; single-atom catalyst; spatially separated cocatalysts

Year:  2020        PMID: 32161133      PMCID: PMC7104179          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913403117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Harvesting solar photon energy to drive redox reactions involving water and oxygen is the most espoused strategy for the green synthesis of alternative fuels such as H2 and H2O2 (1–4). Yet, solar-to-energy conversion efficiencies achieved using current semiconductor photocatalysts remain relatively low (5, 6), due to inherent limitations in material properties such as prevalent charge recombination in low-bandgap materials and the insufficient selectivity toward the fuel synthesis reaction (7). One promising material engineering strategy is to decorate the semiconductor surface with cocatalysts (1, 8), ideally both reductive and oxidative cocatalysts within a single photocatalytic material. Nevertheless, randomly loading two cocatalysts often results in direct contact between oxidation and reduction centers, worsening the charge recombination that is detrimental to photosynthetic reactions (Fig. 1) (9).
Fig. 1.

(A) Randomly loading two cocatalysts leads to detrimental sequences of reactions involving oxidant (Ox) and reductant (Red). (B) Core/shell structured photocatalysts and (C) photocatalysts with different exposed crystalline facets to achieve controlled spatial separation of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts. (D) Spatial separation of Co single atom (as oxidation center) and AQ (as reduction center) cocatalysts by anchoring them in the center (i.e., pyridinic N) and on the edge (i.e., primary/secondary amine N) of 2D ultrathin C3N4, respectively.

(A) Randomly loading two cocatalysts leads to detrimental sequences of reactions involving oxidant (Ox) and reductant (Red). (B) Core/shell structured photocatalysts and (C) photocatalysts with different exposed crystalline facets to achieve controlled spatial separation of oxidative and reductive cocatalysts. (D) Spatial separation of Co single atom (as oxidation center) and AQ (as reduction center) cocatalysts by anchoring them in the center (i.e., pyridinic N) and on the edge (i.e., primary/secondary amine N) of 2D ultrathin C3N4, respectively. Placing two cocatalysts without direct contact requires sophisticated material architecture and synthesis strategy. One cocatalyst, typically oxidative, can be loaded on a substrate in trace amounts to minimize such contact but only at the expense of the available catalytic sites and thus the overall efficiency (10, 11). A more promising strategy is to design the substrate photocatalysts to provide physically separated sites for cocatalyst hosting. For instance, Wang et al. (9) recently fabricated a core/shell photocatalyst that can host reductive and oxidative cocatalysts separated inside and outside of the shell surfaces (Fig. 1). Following this seminal work, various core/shell structures have been prepared, which typically require complicated synthesis procedures involving the use of sacrificial templates (e.g., SiO2) (12–15). Alternatively, different facets of photocatalytic materials were found to selectively load different cocatalysts, allowing spatial segregation (Fig. 1) (16–18). The existing strategies to prepare spatially separated cocatalysts, however, exclusively rely on the three-dimensional nature of the substrate structure and cannot be readily extended to 2D materials such as graphitic carbon nitride (C3N4). C3N4 has often been used as the semiconductor material of choice for the photocatalytic synthesis of H2O2 (3, 19, 20), an emerging substitute for compressed H2 due to recent advances in H2O2 fuel-cell technology (21). C3N4 exhibits valence-band (VB) and conduction-band (CB) potentials that span those of H2O/O2 and H2O2/O2 redox pairs and is capable of harnessing broad spectrum of sunlight due to its low-bandgap energy. However, solar-to-fuel conversion efficiencies remain, in general, relatively low due to limitations that are commonly found in other materials: 1) ineffective hole scavenging via water oxidation and the resulting charge recombination (3, 19), which often necessitates the addition of organic electron donors (22–25), and 2) low selectivity toward H2O2 synthesis via two-electron reduction of O2 (O2 + 2H+ + 2e− → H2O2) as compared to four-electron reduction of O2 (O2 + 4H+ + 4e− → 2H2O) or two-electron H2 evolution (2H+ + 2e− → H2) (3, 19). Here we introduce an innovative strategy to load two cocatalysts onto 2D C3N4, with controlled physical separation in atomistic scale (Fig. 1). We use cobalt and anthraquinone (AQ) as cocatalysts that are crucial for efficient photocatalytic synthesis of H2O2. Co is anchored to void center of the C3N4 as a single atom (Co1) and serves to facilitate the water oxidation (26–30). At the same time, AQ is attached to amine anchors that are present only on the edge of C3N4, ensuring that it is not in direct contact with the Co centers. The AQ enhances the selectivity of O2 reduction to H2O2, following the mechanism widely exploited in current industrial H2O2 production process (31). The composite catalyst, Co1/AQ/C3N4, photocatalytically produces H2O2 at high efficiency under simulated solar irradiation without the supply of a sacrificial agent. We first prepared ultrathin C3N4 nanosheets by exfoliating bulk C3N4 under probe sonication (32). The C3N4 nanosheets appeared to be only a few layers thick according to high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images (Fig. 2). We then loaded Co onto the ultrathin C3N4 using a two-step synthesis: attachment of Co precursors to anchor sites followed by pyrolysis (33). Co ions are attached to the void center of C3N4 nanosheets through forming stable coordination with pyridinic N atoms in surrounding heptazine units of C3N4 (Fig. 1), as suggested by this site having the lowest relative energy (34, 35). After pyrolysis under N2 atmosphere, Co ions were further phosphodized under PH3 atmosphere to enhance their activity for water oxidation (26, 33, 36).
Fig. 2.

(A and B) HRTEM and EDS images of Co1/AQ/C3N4. (C) Photooxidative deposition of Mn on Co1/C3N4. (D and E) HAADF-STEM image of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (F) FT-IR spectra of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (G) Photoreductive deposition of Au on AQ/C3N4.

(A and B) HRTEM and EDS images of Co1/AQ/C3N4. (C) Photooxidative deposition of Mn on Co1/C3N4. (D and E) HAADF-STEM image of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (F) FT-IR spectra of C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (G) Photoreductive deposition of Au on AQ/C3N4. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping suggests that Co is uniformly distributed across the C3N4 surface (Fig. 2). To further provide a visual confirmation, we photooxidatively deposited Mn2+ to grow MnOx nanoparticles (Mn2+ + xH2O + [2x-2]h+ → MnOx + 2xH+) on Co as seed sites (16, 37, 38). The formation of MnOx across the C3N4 surface readily observed by low-resolution TEM (Fig. 2) suggests that Co atoms are also distributed across the C3N4 surface and serve as oxidation centers. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images indicates that the Co is likely atomically dispersed [Fig. 2 as compared to C3N4 before Co loading (Fig. 2)], since the radii of Co were estimated to be ∼0.5 Å. Notably, all Co single atoms identified were located at least ∼1 nm away from the edge of C3N4 (Fig. 2 and ), indicating the selective loading of Co on the surface, not the edge, of C3N4 nanosheet. Consistent with the absence of Co metallic clusters in HAADF-STEM images, another strong piece of evidence for the atomic dispersion of Co is provided by the absence of Co-Co coordination in K-edge spectrum from Fourier-transformed extended X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy (FT-EXAFS, Fig. 3). The spectrum also indicates that Co atoms are primarily coordinated by P (i.e., peak at 1.8 Å in FT-EXAFS) (33), which confirms the complete phosphidation. The coordination with P is further supported by the occurrence of a prominent Co-P peak at 129.6 eV in the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum (Fig. 3). A P-N peak at 133.6 eV also suggests that P atoms coordinate with N atoms in heptazine rings of C3N4. Best-fit parameters extracted from the FT-EXAFS spectra (Fig. 3) suggest an average Co-P coordination distance at 2.29 Å and coordination number of 4.1 (), consistent with previous observations (33). Co atoms are found to be positively charged with partially unoccupied 3d orbitals. Comparison of the Co K-edge normalized near-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XANES) of Co1/AQ/C3N4 with those of reference compounds shows that the spectral line shape and the absorption edge position closely resemble those of CoO (Fig. 3), indicating that the oxidation state of the Co single atoms is close to +2. Density-functional theory calculations (DFT; see for details) confirm that Co atoms are positively charged. The above results collectively suggest that Co cocatalysts are uniformly loaded in the center of C3N4 nanosheet as positively charged single atoms.
Fig. 3.

(A) FT EXAFS spectra of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. The intensity of Co3O4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 was normalized to the same maximum of Co foil to facilitate the comparison of radical distances by multiplying with a factor of 2.1 and 3.6, respectively. (B) Fit of Co1/AQ/C3N4 EXAFS spectra using Co foil and Co3O4. (Inset) Corresponding K-space curves. (C) Normalized XANES of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. (D) Binding energy of N 1s, C 1s, P 2p, and O 1s for ultrathin C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 by high-resolution XPS.

(A) FT EXAFS spectra of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. The intensity of Co3O4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 was normalized to the same maximum of Co foil to facilitate the comparison of radical distances by multiplying with a factor of 2.1 and 3.6, respectively. (B) Fit of Co1/AQ/C3N4 EXAFS spectra using Co foil and Co3O4. (Inset) Corresponding K-space curves. (C) Normalized XANES of Co1/AQ/C3N4 at the Co K edge. (D) Binding energy of N 1s, C 1s, P 2p, and O 1s for ultrathin C3N4 and Co1/AQ/C3N4 by high-resolution XPS. XAFS measurements at the P K-edge further provide a clue on the structure of Co single atom and its surrounding. EXAFS spectrum at the P K-edge indicates that P atoms are primarily coordinated by Co atoms (i.e., peak at 1.87 Å in FT-EXAFS; ), which is consistent with the corresponding FT-EXAFS data recorded at Co K-edge (Fig. 3). These P atoms are further coordinated with N atoms in heptazine rings of C3N4 as well as O atoms, as evidenced by P-N peak at 133.5 eV and P-O peak at 134.5 eV in XPS spectrum (Fig. 3). XANES spectrum at the P K-edge shows that the preedge region is dominated by the strong feature at 2,143.6 eV, which is assigned to low-valence phosphidic species () (39). The higher-energy, broader peak centered around 2,152.0 eV is consistent with high-valence P () (40). Comparison of intensities of the two maxima suggests that 20–30% of the phosphorus atoms exist in high-valence state. Alternatively speaking, Co atoms are coordinated with three low-valence P atoms (i.e., coordinated with N atoms in heptazine rings of C3N4) and one high-valence P atom (i.e., coordinated with O atoms). Geometry optimization conducted under these constraints using DFT confirms that the proposed Co center structure is stable (Fig. 1, top and side view of Co center), in which Co is placed out of C3N4 plane. Other configurations, particularly in-plane P substitutions and Co insertions, resulted in sheet disintegration or massive structural rearrangement. Loading Co single atoms significantly enhanced C3N4 for water oxidation (2H2OO2 + 4H+ + 4e−), as indicated by an 8.4-fold enhancement on 4-h O2 production (Fig. 4 and see for details). According to our DFT calculations (see for details), the enhanced water oxidation is attributed to strong adsorption of water molecule on Co single atom (exothermic by 2.7 eV when replacing the phosphite moiety), while no adsorption is observed on the plane C3N4 sheet. In addition, atomically dispersed Co produces two distinct, occupied, midgap states ∼0.5 and 0.9 eV above the VB maximum when the H2O is absorbed, promoting the localization of photoexcited holes and subsequent charge separation (Fig. 5 ), whereas Co nanoparticles completely fill the bandgap and thus act as charge recombination centers (Fig. 5). All of these results indicate that Co loading enhances the hole quenching by water and therefore the overall charge-separation, i.e., more electrons are available for the reductive H2O2 synthesis.
Fig. 4.

(A) Time course of O2 evolution measured under 0.6-kPa Ar pressure and 300-W xenon lamp irradiation with 0.5 g/L of catalyst, 1 g/L La2O3, and 20 mM AgNO3 in 100 mL water. (B) Selectivity of H2O2 production. (C and D) Time course of H2O2 production measured under simulated sunlight irradiation (xenon lamp solar simulator, 100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5G) with 0.5 g/L of catalyst under O2-saturated condition. Solid lines are the fitting result of the kinetic model. Dotted lines are H2O2 productions estimated assuming additive enhancement of each cocatalyst. (E and F) H2O2 formation and decomposition rate constants. Error bars represent the SDs of triplicates.

Fig. 5.

Density of states computed with DFT for (A) C3N4, (B) C3N4 loaded with Co single atom cocatalyst (SAC), (C) C3N4 loaded with Co nanoparticle (showing Co4 as an example), and (D) Co loaded with AQ.

(A) Time course of O2 evolution measured under 0.6-kPa Ar pressure and 300-W xenon lamp irradiation with 0.5 g/L of catalyst, 1 g/L La2O3, and 20 mM AgNO3 in 100 mL water. (B) Selectivity of H2O2 production. (C and D) Time course of H2O2 production measured under simulated sunlight irradiation (xenon lamp solar simulator, 100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5G) with 0.5 g/L of catalyst under O2-saturated condition. Solid lines are the fitting result of the kinetic model. Dotted lines are H2O2 productions estimated assuming additive enhancement of each cocatalyst. (E and F) H2O2 formation and decomposition rate constants. Error bars represent the SDs of triplicates. Density of states computed with DFT for (A) C3N4, (B) C3N4 loaded with Co single atom cocatalyst (SAC), (C) C3N4 loaded with Co nanoparticle (showing Co4 as an example), and (D) Co loaded with AQ. Secondly, we loaded AQ cocatalyst onto Co1/C3N4 by forming amide bonds between carboxylic groups in anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid and primary/secondary amine groups on the edge of C3N4 (Fig. 1) (8, 35). Successful loading of AQ was confirmed by XPS in which Co1/AQ/C3N4 exhibits strong peak corresponding to C-C fragments (284.7 eV) that mostly originate from AQ molecules (Fig. 3). The AQ molecules remained bound to C3N4 after intensive solvent washing, suggesting that they are chemically attached rather than physically adsorbed (23). The successful loading of AQ was also confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectroscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, the intensities of the FT-IR peaks corresponding to the amide functionalities, including the C=O stretching vibration peak at 1627 cm−1 and the N-H stretching vibration peak at 3,076 cm−1, increased dramatically with AQ loading. The quantitative analysis of XPS spectra indicates that AQ was loaded at 16% (wt/wt). To provide a visual confirmation of the site-selective loading of AQ, we photoreductively deposited noble metals by reducing metal precursors (i.e., H2AuCl4 or H2PtCl6) on AQ as seed sites (Mn+ + ne− → M0) (16). TEM images clearly showed that the Au and Pt nanoparticles were selectively deposited on the edge of C3N4 nanosheets (Fig. 2 and ), which were in stark contrast to random deposition of Au nanoparticles on pristine C3N4 surface without AQ functionality () (41). These results confirm that AQ cocatalysts were selectively loaded on the edge of C3N4 nanosheets and serve as reduction center. DFT calculations confirmed the electron withdrawal by the AQ cocatalyst, where AQ molecule generates an empty state that is only 0.3 eV below the CB of C3N4; while filled AQ states, where a hole would occupy, sits more than 0.8 eV below the VB of C3N4 (Fig. 5). Therefore, transfer of a photoexcited electron to AQ is allowed but transfer of a photoexcited hole is prohibited, leading to enhanced charge separation. Loading AQ cocatalyst onto C3N4 had a significant impact on enhancing the selectivity of H2O2 synthesis from ∼30% by pristine C3N4 to over 60% (Fig. 4); H2O2 production selectivity is defined as the ratio of electrons utilized for H2O2 synthesis to the total number of electrons consumed ( and ref. 22). In contrast, C3N4 exfoliation or Co loading had limited impact on H2O2 production selectivity (Fig. 4). The enhanced H2O2 production selectivity is attributed to the two-step reaction catalyzed by AQ: 1) reductive hydrogenation of AQ to hydroxyanthraquinone (AQH2) utilizing 2 e− from photoexcited C3N4 followed by 2) H2O2 formation from concurrent oxygen reduction and dehydrogenation of AQH2 back to AQ (). The photocatalytic H2O2-production performance of the as-prepn>ared catalysts was evaluated under simulated sunlight irradiation in the absence of organic electron donor. Exfoliation of bulk C3N4 to nanosheets enhanced the photocatalytic H2O2 production performance of C3N4 (Fig. 4) due to a larger number of exposed reaction sites and improved light-harvesting capability (8, 32). The light-harvesting capability of C3N4 was further improved with Co loading, as indicated by the lowered bandgaps [refer to the band-structure diagram ()] constructed from XPS valence spectra () and diffuse reflectance spectra (). Co cocatalyst loading promoted the water oxidation reaction and consequentially reduced detrimental exciton recombination (26, 33, 34, 42), leading to enhanced H2O2 production (Fig. 4). For instance, when Co was loaded as nanoparticles (see for synthesis details), i.e., not as single atoms, H2O2 production was enhanced, albeit slightly; when Co was loaded as single atoms, H2O2 production was enhanced by 4.0-fold. On the other hand, loading AQ cocatalyst onto ultrathin C3N4 improved H2O2 production selectivity, resulting in a 1.9-fold enhancement in H2O2 production (Fig. 4). Simultaneous loading of Co single atoms and AQ cocatalyst significantly enhanced H2O2 production by a factor of 7.3 (Fig. 4). For the solar photocatalytic H2O2 production performed in the absence of electron donor, the initial production rate of 62 µM/h (apparent quantum efficiency = 0.054% over the full spectrum of sunlight; see for calculation details) and the cumulative production of 230 µM over 8-h period () achieved by Co1/AQ/C3N4 in this study are among the highest reported () (43, 44). When the suspension was N2-purged, the H2O2 production was mostly inhibited, confirming that O2 reduction was the major pathway for H2O2 production (). The stability of Co1/AQ/C3N4 was demonstrated by its stable catalytic performance through repetitive use up to five cycles (). XPS () and TEM () analyses show no significant change in chemical composition or ultrathin layered structure of Co1/AQ/C3N4 after 8-h irradiation. We note that a better intersheet packing control may be achieved by immobilizing Co1/AQ/C3N4 to facilitate its application in large-scale photolysis device setup (43, 44). The enhancement on H2O2 production by coloading of Co single atoms and AQ is close to the multiplication of individual enhancements (Fig. 4); i.e., the 4.0-fold enhancement by Co single atom cocatalyst times the 1.9-fold enhancement by AQ cocatalyst is close to the observed 7.3-fold enhancement on 60-min H2O2 production. This collaborative effect suggests that two cocatalysts contribute to H2O2 production enhancement independently without any negating effect. In contrast, when Co was loaded as nanoparticles onto AQ-C3N4, H2O2 production was much lower than that expected by considering the individual effects of Co nanoparticles and AQ (i.e., the observed 1.2-fold enhancement is much lower than the 1.5-fold enhancement by Co nanoparticle times the 1.9-fold enhancement by AQ on 60-min H2O2 production; Fig. 4). This is due to random distribution of large Co particles across C3N4 and likely contact between Co cocatalyst and AQ cocatalyst. Such a contact would facilitate direct electron transfer without H2O2 evolution or water splitting (Fig. 1). Loading Co as single atom, in contrast, ensures that Co is spatially separated from AQ. Since Co atom occupies the void center of C3N4 and AQ is located only at the edge of C3N4, molecular structure of C3N4 inherently maintains their separations at the minimum of 0.8 nm (). Consistently, the steady-state photoluminescence from Co1/AQ/C3N4 was markedly reduced compared not only to C3N4 but also to Conano/AQ/C3N4, indicating that the radiative recombination is more effectively retarded with Co single atom than Co nanoparticle (Fig. 6). Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL, Fig. 6) analyses show that the lifetime of excited-state Co1/AQ/C3N4 (1.73 ns) is shorter than that of C3N4 (3.23 ns) and Co-Nano/AQ/C3N4 (2.23 ns), highlighting the improved photoexciton dissociation in Co1/AQ/C3N4 that was realized by spatial separation of AQ and Co single atoms.
Fig. 6.

(A) Steady-state PL emission spectra (excitation at 375 nm) of C3N4, Conano/AQ/C3N4, and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (B) TRPL spectra monitored for entire emission between 400 and 800 nm. The curves were fitted to the equation y = y0 + A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + A3 exp(−t/τ3).

(A) Steady-state PL emission spectra (excitation at 375 nm) of C3N4, Conano/AQ/C3N4, and Co1/AQ/C3N4. (B) TRPL spectra monitored for entire emission between 400 and 800 nm. The curves were fitted to the equation y = y0 + A1 exp(−t/τ1) + A2 exp(−t/τ2) + A3 exp(−t/τ3). We further analyze the H2O2 production by evaluating the rate of H2O2 formation (kf) separately from the rate of H2O2 decomposition (kd) (see for the kinetic analysis). The results show that H2O2 formation rate constant increased upon individual loading of Co single atom, Co nanoparticle, or AQ. While simultaneous loading of Co single atom and AQ lead to additive enhancement on kf, simultaneous loading of Co nanoparticle and AQ had an antagonistic effect on kf (Fig. 4), once again highlighting the importance of controlled physical separation between Co and AQ. It is also noteworthy that Co may negatively impact H2O2 synthesis performance by enhancing the oxidative decomposition of H2O2 (Fig. 4). This catalyzed H2O2 decomposition was minimized by separating H2O2 production centers (i.e., AQ) from Co decomposition sites, as indicated by much lower kd in Co1/AQ/C3N4 system as compared to Co1/C3N4 system (Fig. 4). Results of our study suggest a facile strategy to anchor two spatially separated cocatalysts on a 2D photocatalyst. Such spatial sepn>aration ensures that the functions of both cocatalysts (i.e., Co1 for enhanced water oxidation activity and AQ for improved H2O2 production selectivity) are fully utilized, resulting in additive enhancement in H2O2 photosynthesis. Here, atomic dispersion of metal cocatalyst presents advantage over conventional nanoparticles because the small size and strong ligand–metal coordination of single atom allow for facile manipulation of loading sites. The stark contrast on the performance of Co single atoms versus nanoparticles emphasizes the exclusive benefits of single atom catalysts in this material design. This center/edge strategy for loading two spatially separated cocatalysts may be also applicable on other 2D photocatalysts for achieving efficient charge separation while maintaining the effectiveness of both cocatalysts.

Methods

Preparation of Photocatalysts.

Bulk C3N4 was prepn>ared following a thermal polymerization procedure by heating melamine powder in a ceramic crucible at a heating rate of 1 °C/min to 550 °C and annealing for 5 h in a muffle furnace. As-prepared bulk C3N4 was grounded, exfoliated under probe sonication for 8 h, separated by centrifugation, washed with deionized water, and dried at 80 °C overnight. As-prepared ultrathin C3N4 (160 mg) was dispersed in 50 mL water under ultrasonication for 30 min, followed by addition of 1.5 mL Co(NO3)2 solution (2 g/L). The mixture was stirred and heated at 70 °C for 18 h, separated by centrifugation, dried at 80 °C overnight, and annealed at 400 °C for 2 h in a tube furnace under N2 gas. The obtained powder was grounded, mixed with NaPO2H2O (twice the weight of obtained powder), and heated at 300 °C for 2 h in a tube furnace under N2 gas. As-prepared Co1/C3N4 was washed with water and ethanol, and dried at 80 °C overnight. The Co loading amount was determined to be 0.13% (wt/wt; 0.34% of voids occupied) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, PerkinElmer SCIEX Elan DRC-e) analysis after acid digestion. As-prepared Co1/C3N4 (100 mg) was mixed with 10 mg anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid, 7.7 mg diisopropylethylamine, 8.1 mg 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate, and 11.5 mg N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride. The mixture was dispersed in 50 mL dichloromethane under ultrasonication for 5 min and stirred for 48 h. The Co1/AQ/C3N4 product was separated by centrifugation, washed with dichloromethane and water, and dried at 80 °C overnight. Co and AQ were loaded at a molar ratio of 1:37.

Catalyst Characterizations.

HAADF-STEM images were taken using a Titan Themis Z STEM (ThermoFisher Scientific) opn>erated at 200 kV, coupled with a probe aberration corrector to improve imaging spatial resolution to less than 1 Å. XPS measurements were performed with a Versa Probe II Scanning XPS Microprobe [Physical Electronics (PHI)]. We performed a survey analysis across the entire energy range and higher-resolution analyses in the N 1s, C 1s, P 2p, and O 1s regions. The XAS spectra at Co K edge were measured at Beamline 8-ID (ISS) of the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory, using a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator and a passivated implanted planar silicon fluorescence detector. XANES data were collected at room temperature, with energy calibrated using Co foil. The P K-edge XAS data were collected at 8-BM of NSLS-II under fluorescence mode, employing a Si (111) crystals monochromator (45). Each sample was scanned for seven times to get better signal to noise ratio. Photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra were obtained using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Shimadzu RF-5301). PL lifetime decays were measured by an inverted-type scanning confocal microscope (MicroTime-200, Picoquant) with a 20× objective. A single-mode pulsed diode laser (excitation wavelength at 375 nm with an instrumental response function of ∼240 ps in pulse width) was used to as an excitation source to excite the samples coated on glass substrate. A dichroic mirror (490 DCXR, AHF), a long-pass filter (HQ500lp, AHF), and an avalanche photodiode detector (PDM series, MPD) were used to collect the entire emission (400–800 nm) from the samples. Photon counting and exponential fitting of the obtained PL decays were performed using the SymPhoTime software (version 5.3).

Photocatalytic Activity Tests.

Photocatalytic production of H2O2 was assessed by irradiation of photocatalyst suspension (12 mL, 0.5 g/L) using a xenon lamp solar simulator (model 10500; Abet Technologies, Inc.). The light intensity was adjusted to 100 mW/cm2 (AM 1.5G; irradiation area = 1.77 cm2). The suspension was purged with O2 before (for 5 min) and during irradiation. At designated time points, small aliquots from suspensions were taken for analysis of H2O2 productions.

Data Availability.

All data of this study are included in the text and .
  25 in total

1.  Water splitting. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Yang Liu; Naiyun Liu; Yuzhi Han; Xing Zhang; Hui Huang; Yeshayahu Lifshitz; Shuit-Tong Lee; Jun Zhong; Zhenhui Kang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Core/Shell photocatalyst with spatially separated co-catalysts for efficient reduction and oxidation of water.

Authors:  Daoai Wang; Takashi Hisatomi; Tsuyoshi Takata; Chengsi Pan; Masao Katayama; Jun Kubota; Kazunari Domen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting.

Authors:  Takashi Hisatomi; Jun Kubota; Kazunari Domen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  The role of cobalt phosphate in enhancing the photocatalytic activity of α-Fe2O3 toward water oxidation.

Authors:  Monica Barroso; Alexander J Cowan; Stephanie R Pendlebury; Michael Grätzel; David R Klug; James R Durrant
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Resorcinol-formaldehyde resins as metal-free semiconductor photocatalysts for solar-to-hydrogen peroxide energy conversion.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Shiraishi; Takahiro Takii; Takumi Hagi; Shinnosuke Mori; Yusuke Kofuji; Yasutaka Kitagawa; Shunsuke Tanaka; Satoshi Ichikawa; Takayuki Hirai
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Porous TiO2 Nanotubes with Spatially Separated Platinum and CoOx Cocatalysts Produced by Atomic Layer Deposition for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production.

Authors:  Jiankang Zhang; Zhuobin Yu; Zhe Gao; Huibin Ge; Shichao Zhao; Chaoqiu Chen; Shuai Chen; Xili Tong; Meihua Wang; Zhanfeng Zheng; Yong Qin
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 7.  Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4)-Based Photocatalysts for Artificial Photosynthesis and Environmental Remediation: Are We a Step Closer To Achieving Sustainability?

Authors:  Wee-Jun Ong; Lling-Lling Tan; Yun Hau Ng; Siek-Ting Yong; Siang-Piao Chai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Enhanced photoresponsive ultrathin graphitic-phase C3N4 nanosheets for bioimaging.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhang; Xiao Xie; Hui Wang; Jiajia Zhang; Bicai Pan; Yi Xie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Cobalt-phosphate oxygen-evolving compound.

Authors:  Matthew W Kanan; Yogesh Surendranath; Daniel G Nocera
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 54.564

10.  Precise Formation of a Hollow Carbon Nitride Structure with a Janus Surface To Promote Water Splitting by Photoredox Catalysis.

Authors:  Dandan Zheng; Xu-Ning Cao; Xinchen Wang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  6 in total

1.  Highly efficient photosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide in ambient conditions.

Authors:  Yu-Xin Ye; Jinhui Pan; Fangyan Xie; Li Gong; Siming Huang; Zhuofeng Ke; Fang Zhu; Jianqiao Xu; Gangfeng Ouyang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spontaneous exciton dissociation in organic photocatalyst under ambient conditions for highly efficient synthesis of hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  Huijie Yan; Minhui Shen; Yong Shen; Xu-Dong Wang; Wei Lin; Jinhui Pan; Jian He; Yu-Xin Ye; Xin Yang; Fang Zhu; Jianqiao Xu; Jianguo He; Gangfeng Ouyang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Unraveling of cocatalysts photodeposited selectively on facets of BiVO4 to boost solar water splitting.

Authors:  Yu Qi; Jiangwei Zhang; Yuan Kong; Yue Zhao; Shanshan Chen; Deng Li; Wei Liu; Yifan Chen; Tengfeng Xie; Junyan Cui; Can Li; Kazunari Domen; Fuxiang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Molecularly Engineered Covalent Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Peroxide Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Mingpu Kou; Yongye Wang; Yixue Xu; Liqun Ye; Yingping Huang; Baohua Jia; Hui Li; Jiaqi Ren; Yu Deng; Jiahao Chen; Ying Zhou; Kai Lei; Li Wang; Wei Liu; Hongwei Huang; Tianyi Ma
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 16.823

5.  Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles-Modified Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Evolution.

Authors:  Jixiang Hou; Xu Zhang; Kaiwen Wang; Peijie Ma; Hanwen Hu; Xiyuan Zhou; Kun Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Oxidative Conversion of Glucose to Formic Acid as a Renewable Hydrogen Source Using an Abundant Solid Base Catalyst.

Authors:  Atsushi Takagaki; Wataru Obata; Tatsumi Ishihara
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.