OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin use for intrapartum GBS prophylaxis is not well characterized. The objective of this study was to describe trends in the use of vancomycin among women undergoing vaginal delivery with group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. METHODS: An administrative inpatient database that includes medications was analyzed to evaluate antibiotic use in women undergoing vaginal delivery hospitalizations complicated by GBS colonization from January 2006 to March 2015. Patients with other obstetric or infectious indications for antibiotics were excluded. Frequency of use of individual antibiotic agents was determined. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess temporal trends. An adjusted log-linear regression model accounting for demographic and hospital factors with vancomycin receipt as the outcome was performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measure of effect. Hospital level variation in administration of vancomycin was also evaluated. RESULTS: 469,717 deliveries met inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Use of vancomycin increased from 0.8% of patients in 2006 to 3.8% of patients in the first quarter of 2015. Comparing 2015 to 2006 both the unadjusted (relative risk 4.89 95% CI 4.26-5.60) and adjusted (aRR 4.52 95% 3.94-5.19) models demonstrated significantly increased likelihood of vancomycin administration. In evaluating hospital level vancomycin use, variation was noted with 8.0% of centers administering vancomycin to ≥6.0% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin is becoming increasingly commonly used for intrapartum GBS prophylaxis. Further research and quality improvements initiatives are indicated to optimize intrapartum GBS antibiotic prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin use for intrapartum GBS prophylaxis is not well characterized. The objective of this study was to describe trends in the use of vancomycin among women undergoing vaginal delivery with group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization. METHODS: An administrative inpatient database that includes medications was analyzed to evaluate antibiotic use in women undergoing vaginal delivery hospitalizations complicated by GBS colonization from January 2006 to March 2015. Patients with other obstetric or infectious indications for antibiotics were excluded. Frequency of use of individual antibiotic agents was determined. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess temporal trends. An adjusted log-linear regression model accounting for demographic and hospital factors with vancomycin receipt as the outcome was performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measure of effect. Hospital level variation in administration of vancomycin was also evaluated. RESULTS: 469,717 deliveries met inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Use of vancomycin increased from 0.8% of patients in 2006 to 3.8% of patients in the first quarter of 2015. Comparing 2015 to 2006 both the unadjusted (relative risk 4.89 95% CI 4.26-5.60) and adjusted (aRR 4.52 95% 3.94-5.19) models demonstrated significantly increased likelihood of vancomycin administration. In evaluating hospital level vancomycin use, variation was noted with 8.0% of centers administering vancomycin to ≥6.0% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin is becoming increasingly commonly used for intrapartum GBS prophylaxis. Further research and quality improvements initiatives are indicated to optimize intrapartum GBS antibiotic prophylaxis.
Entities:
Keywords:
GBS; GBS antibiotics; GBS prophylaxis; group B streptococcus
Authors: Louise K Francois Watkins; Lesley McGee; Stephanie J Schrag; Bernard Beall; Jennifer Hudson Jain; Tracy Pondo; Monica M Farley; Lee H Harrison; Shelley M Zansky; Joan Baumbach; Ruth Lynfield; Paula Snippes Vagnone; Lisa A Miller; William Schaffner; Ann R Thomas; James P Watt; Susan Petit; Gayle E Langley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: M L Grayson; G M Eliopoulos; C B Wennersten; K L Ruoff; P C De Girolami; M J Ferraro; R C Moellering Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mei L Castor; Cynthia G Whitney; Kathryn Como-Sabetti; Richard R Facklam; Patricia Ferrieri; Joanne M Bartkus; Billie A Juni; Paul R Cieslak; Monica M Farley; Nellie B Dumas; Stephanie J Schrag; Ruth Lynfield Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-02-05