Literature DB >> 32159763

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) and provider assessment in mental health: goals, implementation, setting, measurement characteristics and barriers.

Marc Gelkopf1,2, Yael Mazor1,2, David Roe1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review and integrate the literature on mental-health-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and routine outcome measures (ROMs), namely in the domains of goals, characteristics, implementation, settings, measurements and barriers. PROM/ROM aims mainly to ascertain treatment impact in routine clinical practice through systematic service users' health assessment using standardized self-report, caretaker and/or provider assessment. DATA SOURCES: Psych INFO and PubMed including Medline, Biomed Central, EMBASE Psychiatry and Elsevier Science's Direct. STUDY SELECTION: Systemized review of literature (2000-2018) on implementation and sustainability of PROMs/ROMs in adult mental health settings (MHS). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Systemized review of literature (2000-2018) on numerous aspects of PROM/ROM implementation and sustainability in adult MHS worldwide.
RESULTS: Based on 103 articles, PROMs/ROMs were implemented mostly in outpatient settings for people with assorted mental health disorders receiving a diversity of services. Frequency of assessments and completion rates varied: one-third of projects had provider assessments; about half had both provider and self-assessments. Barriers to implementation: perceptions that PROM/ROM is intrusive to clinical practice, lack of infrastructure, fear that results may be used for cost containment and service eligibility instead of service quality improvement, difficulties with measures, ethical and confidentiality regulations and web security data management regulations.
CONCLUSION: Improving data input systems, sufficient training, regular feedback, measures to increase administrative and logistic support to improve implementation, acceptability, feasibility and sustainability, follow-up assessments and client attrition rate reduction efforts are only some measures needed to enhance PROM/ROM efficiency and efficacy.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; evaluation; literature overview; mental health; mental health services; patient-reported outcome (PROMs); routine outcome measures (ROM); treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32159763     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Angela C Wolff; Andrea Dresselhuis; Samar Hejazi; Duncan Dixon; Deborah Gibson; A Fuchsia Howard; Sarah Liva; Barbara Astle; Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham; Vanessa K Noonan; Lisa Edwards
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  Protocol for implementation of the 'AusPROM' recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study.

Authors:  Meg E Morris; Natasha Brusco; Jeffrey Woods; Paul S Myles; Anita Hodge; Cathy Jones; Damien Lloyd; Vincent Rovtar; Amanda Clifford; Victoria Atkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Previous concussions increase risk of mental health disability in college athletes.

Authors:  Karlee Burns; Karly Kerod; Jane McDevitt
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Regina Skar-Fröding; Hanne Clausen; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Torleif Ruud; Mike Slade; Kristin S Heiervang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Patient-reported outcome measures suitable for quality of life/well-being assessment in multisectoral, multinational and multiperson mental health economic evaluations.

Authors:  Agata Łaszewska; Timea Mariann Helter; Anna Nagel; Nataša Perić; Judit Simon
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.