Literature DB >> 32159450

Consecutive Screening Rounds with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Enable Detection of Breast Cancers with Poor Prognosis.

Linda Moy1, Samantha L Heller1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32159450      PMCID： PMC7192565          DOI： 10.1148/radiol.2020192762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl; Shannon Gaffney; Anne Marie McCarthy; Kathryn P Lowry; Pragya A Dang; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.

Authors:  Kristin Johnson; Sophia Zackrisson; Aldana Rosso; Hanna Sartor; Lao H Saal; Ingvar Andersson; Kristina Lång
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Tone Hovda; Siri H B Brandal; Sofie Sebuødegård; Åsne S Holen; Hilde Bjørndal; Per Skaane; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Is Tomosynthesis the Future of Breast Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Tone Hovda; Åsne S Holen; Christoph I Lee; Judy Albertsen; Hilde Bjørndal; Siri H B Brandal; Randi Gullien; Jon Lømo; Daehoon Park; Linda Romundstad; Pål Suhrke; Einar Vigeland; Per Skaane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew Oustimov; Susan P Weinstein; Marie B Synnestvedt; Mitchell Schnall; Emily F Conant
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Eben; Ingvild N Jebsen; Mona Krager; Unni Haakenaasen; Ulrika Ekseth; Mina Izadi; Solveig Hofvind; Randi Gullien
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Samantha P Zuckerman; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Katrina E Korhonen; Julia A Birnbaum; Jennifer D Tobey; Mitchell D Schnall; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall.

Authors:  M Luke Marinovich; Kylie E Hunter; Petra Macaskill; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; William E Barlow; Sally D Herschorn; Donald L Weaver; Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn P Lowry; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander; Christopher I Li; Mitchell D Schnall; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.