Literature DB >> 32159422

Plantarflexion force is amplified with sensory stimulation during ramping submaximal isometric contractions.

Gregory E P Pearcey1,2,3, Yao Sun1,2,3, E Paul Zehr1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Stimulating cutaneous nerves, causing tactile sensations, reduces the perceived heaviness of an object, suggesting that either descending commands are facilitated or the perception of effort is reduced when tactile sensation is enhanced. Sensory stimulation can also mitigate decrements in motor output and spinal cord excitability that occur with fatigue. The effects of sensory stimulation applied with coincident timing of voluntary force output, however, are yet to be examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine effects of sensory enhancement to nerves innervating opposed skin areas of the foot (top or bottom) on force production during voluntary plantarflexion or dorsiflexion contractions. Stimulation trains were applied for 2 s at either a uniform 150 Hz or a modulated frequency that increased linearly from 50 to 150 Hz and were delivered at the initiation of the contraction. Participants were instructed to perform a ramp contraction [~10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)/s] to ~20% MVC and then to hold ~20% MVC for 2 s while receiving real-time visual feedback. Cutaneous reflexes were evoked 75 ms after initiating the hold (75 ms after sensory enhancement ended). Force output was greater for all sensory-enhanced conditions compared with control during plantarflexion; however, force output was not amplified during dorsiflexion. Cutaneous reflexes evoked after sensory enhancement were unaltered. These results indicate that sensory enhancement can amplify plantarflexion but not dorsiflexion, likely as a result of differences in neuroanatomical projections to the flexor and extensor motor pools. Further work is required to elucidate the mechanisms of enhanced force during cutaneous stimulation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The efficacy of behaviorally timed sensory stimulation to enhance sensations and amplify force output has not been examined. Here we show cutaneous nerve sensory stimulation can amplify plantarflexion force output. This amplification in force occurs irrespective of whether the cutaneous field that is stimulated resides on the surface that is producing the force or the opposing surface. This information may provide insights for the development of technologies to improve performance and/or rehabilitation training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cutaneous reflex; cutaneous stimulation; force output; reflex modulation; sensory enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32159422      PMCID: PMC7191529          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00650.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

Review 1.  Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects.

Authors:  J Duysens; F Clarac; H Cruse
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Modulatory effects on human sensorimotor cortex by whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation.

Authors:  S M Golaszewski; C M Siedentopf; F Koppelstaetter; P Rhomberg; G M Guendisch; A Schlager; E Gallasch; W Eisner; S R Felber; F M Mottaghy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Qualitative difference of spinal reflex corresponding with qualitative difference of cutaneous stimulus.

Authors:  C S Sherrington
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1903-08-24       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  In humans Ib facilitation depends on locomotion while suppression of Ib inhibition requires loading.

Authors:  M Faist; C Hoefer; M Hodapp; V Dietz; W Berger; J Duysens
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Excitatory and inhibitory skin areas for flexor and extensor motoneurons.

Authors:  K E HAGBARTH
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1952

6.  Effects of antecedent TENS on EMG activity of the finger flexor muscles and on grip force.

Authors:  Ruth Dickstein; Michal Kafri
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.111

7.  Neural coupling between the arms and legs during rhythmic locomotor-like cycling movement.

Authors:  Jaclyn E Balter; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sensory enhancement amplifies interlimb cutaneous reflexes in wrist extensor muscles.

Authors:  Yao Sun; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cutaneous stimulation fails to alter motor unit recruitment in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  B D Clark; S M Dacko; T C Cope
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Active force perception depends on cerebellar function.

Authors:  Nasir H Bhanpuri; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Repeated and patterned stimulation of cutaneous reflex pathways amplifies spinal cord excitability.

Authors:  Gregory E P Pearcey; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Foot sole cutaneous stimulation mitigates neuromuscular fatigue during a sustained plantar flexor isometric task.

Authors:  Simone G V S Smith; Geoffrey A Power; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-06-25

3.  Sensory enhancement of warm-up amplifies subsequent grip strength and cycling performance.

Authors:  Benjamin M Nazaroff; Gregory E P Pearcey; Bridget Munro; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The influence of reduced foot dorsum cutaneous sensitivity on the vestibular control of balance.

Authors:  Mathew I B Debenham; Hogun J Kang; Stephen S Cheung; Brian H Dalton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.346

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.