Literature DB >> 32159242

Effects and Mechanisms of Exogenous Electromagnetic Field on Bone Cells: A Review.

Bin Zhang1,2, Yangli Xie1, Zhenhong Ni1, Lin Chen1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis, fractures, and other bone diseases or injuries represent serious health problems in modern society. A variety of treatments including drugs, surgeries, physical therapies, etc. have been used to prevent or delay the progression of these diseases/injuries with limited effects. Electromagnetic field (EMF) has been used to non-invasively treat bone diseases, such as fracture and osteoporosis, for many years. However, because a variety of cellular and molecular events can be affected by EMF with various parameters, the precise bioeffects and underlying mechanisms of specific EMF on bone cells are still obscure. Here, we summarize the common therapeutic parameters (frequency and intensity) of major types of EMF used to treat bone cells taken from 32 papers we selected from the PubMed database published in English from 1991 to 2018. Briefly, pulse EMF promotes the proliferation of osteoblasts when its frequency is 7.5-15 Hz or 50-75 Hz and the intensity is 0.40-1.55 mT or 3.8-4 mT. Sinusoidal EMF, with 0.9-4.8 mT and 45-60 Hz, and static magnetic field with 0.1-0.4 mT or 400 mT, can promote osteoblast differentiation and maturation. Finally, we summarize the latest advances on the molecular signaling pathways influenced by EMF in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. A variety of molecules such as adenosine receptors, calcium channels, BMP2, Notch, Wnt1, etc., can be influenced by EMF in osteoblasts. For osteoclasts, EMF affects RANK, NF-κB, MAPK, etc. We speculate that EMF with different frequencies and intensities exert distinct bioeffects on specific bone cells. More high-quality work is required to explore the detailed effects and underlying mechanisms of EMF on bone cells/skeleton to optimize the application of EMF on bone diseases/injuries. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020;41:263-278
© 2020 Bioelectromagnetics Society. © 2020 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; electromagnetic field; osteoblasts; osteoclasts; skeletal diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32159242     DOI: 10.1002/bem.22258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bone Flap Resorption in Pediatric Patients Following Autologous Cranioplasty.

Authors:  David S Hersh; Hanna J Anderson; Graeme F Woodworth; Jonathan E Martin; Yusuf M Khan
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 2.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis: Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Katia Varani; Fabrizio Vincenzi; Silvia Pasquini; Irene Blo; Simona Salati; Matteo Cadossi; Monica De Mattei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  High slew rate pulsed electromagnetic field enhances bone consolidation and shortens daily treatment duration in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Yucong Li; Yongkang Yang; Ming Wang; Xiaoting Zhang; Shanshan Bai; Xuan Lu; Yuan Li; Erik I Waldorff; Nianli Zhang; Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee; Gang Li
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Hydrogel-hydroxyapatite-monomeric collagen type-I scaffold with low-frequency electromagnetic field treatment enhances osteochondral repair in rabbits.

Authors:  Jiyuan Yan; Chaoxu Liu; Chang Tu; Ruizhuo Zhang; Xiangyu Tang; Hao Li; Huaixi Wang; Yongzhuang Ma; Yingchi Zhang; Hua Wu; Gaohong Sheng
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Osteogenesis Modulation: Induction of Mandibular Bone Growth in Adults by Electrical Field for Aesthetic Purposes.

Authors:  Gregorio Hernandez Zendejas; Marek K Dobke; Andrew Phelps; Gabriel Planas; Marco Sanchez
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  An automated 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor combinable with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulators for bone tissue investigations.

Authors:  Stefano Gabetti; Beatrice Masante; Andrea Cochis; Giovanni Putame; Alessandro Sanginario; Ileana Armando; Elisa Fiume; Alessandro Calogero Scalia; Farah Daou; Francesco Baino; Simona Salati; Umberto Morbiducci; Lia Rimondini; Cristina Bignardi; Diana Massai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Improved osteogenic differentiation by extremely low electromagnetic field exposure: possible application for bone engineering.

Authors:  Erica Costantini; Guya Diletta Marconi; Marcella Reale; Francesca Diomede; Luigia Fonticoli; Lisa Aielli; Oriana Trubiani; Thangavelu Soundara Rajan; Jacopo Pizzicannella
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.531

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.