| Literature DB >> 32158702 |
Ayo P Doumatey1, Adebowale Adeyemo1, Jie Zhou1, Lin Lei1, Sally N Adebamowo2,3, Clement Adebamowo2,3,4, Charles N Rotimi1.
Abstract
Gut dysbiosis has been associated with several disease outcomes including diabetes in human populations. Currently, there are no studies of the gut microbiome composition in relation to type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Africans. Here, we describe the profile of the gut microbiome in non-diabetic adults (controls) and investigate the association between gut microbiota and T2D in urban West Africans. Gut microbiota composition was determined in 291 Nigerians (98 cases, 193 controls) using fecal 16S V4 rRNA gene sequencing done on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Data analysis of operational taxonomic units (OTU) was conducted to describe microbiome composition and identify differences between T2D and controls. The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. Clostridiaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceaea were significantly lower in cases than controls (p < 0.001). Feature selection analysis identified a panel of 18 OTUs enriched in cases that included Desulfovibrio piger, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, and Eubacterium. A panel of 17 OTUs that was enriched in the controls included Collinsella, Ruminococcus lactaris, Anaerostipes, and Clostridium. OTUs with strain-level annotation showing the largest fold-change included Cellulosilyticum ruminicola (log2FC = -3.1; p = 4.2 × 10-5), Clostridium paraputrificum (log2FC = -2.5; p = 0.005), and Clostridium butyricum (log2FC = -1.76; p = 0.01), all lower in cases. These findings are notable because supplementation with Clostridium butyricum and Desulfovibrio piger has been shown to improve hyperglycemia and reduce insulin resistance in murine models. This first investigation of gut microbiome and diabetes in urban Africans shows that T2D is associated with compositional changes in gut microbiota highlighting the possibility of developing strategies to improve glucose control by modifying bacterial composition in the gut.Entities:
Keywords: 16S V4 rRNA sequencing; gut microbiome; microbial composition; type 2 diabetes; urban Africans
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158702 PMCID: PMC7052266 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
List of microbiome studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa.
| Population structure of human gut bacteria in a diverse cohort from rural Tanzania and Botswana | 2019 | Tanzania and Botswana | Adults/Rural Hunter-Gathers, pastoralists, agropastoralists, Mixed hunter-gathers/agropastoralist | Comparative study (geographic and subsistence lifestyle) | Hansen et al., |
| Diet, environments, and gut microbiota. A preliminary investigation in children living in rural and Urban Burkina Faso and Italy | 2017 | Burkina Faso | Children/rural and urban | Comparative study (within the same country) | De Filippo et al., |
| Atopic dermatitis and food sensitization in South African toddlers: role of fiber and gut microbiota | 2017 | South Africa | Children/Urban | Comparative study (disease state and controls) | Mahdavinia et al., |
| Seasonal cycling in the gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania | 2017 | Tanzania | Children and adults, Hunter-gatherers age > 3 | Comparative study (dry season vs. wet season | Smits et al., |
| Variation in Rural African Gut microbiota is strongly correlated with colonization by entamoeba and subsistence | 2015 | Cameroon | Adults/ Hunter-gathers, farmers, fishermen | Comparative study (mode of subsistence in same environment and degree of urbanization) | Morton et al., |
| Metagenome Sequencing of the Hadza Hunter-gatherer gut microbiota | 2015 | Tanzania | Adults and children/hunter-gathers | Comparative functional Analysis, gut microbiome resistome profile | Rampelli et al., |
| Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers | 2014 | Tanzania | Adults and children/hunter-gathers | Descriptive and comparative study across different populations (including mode of subsistence) | Schnorr et al., |
| Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography | 2012 | Malawi | Adults and children/monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs/Rural | Comparative study across socio-geographic populations and age range | Yatsunenko et al., |
| Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa | 2010 | Burkina Faso | Children/rural and urban | Comparative study (inter-continental) | De Filippo et al., |
Characteristics of gut microbiome study participants: the AADM study.
| Age (years) | 54.3 (13.3) | 59.7 (10.4) | |
| Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) | 30.33 (6.09) | 32.21 (5.94) | |
| Percent fat mass (PFM, %) | 37.30 (9.65) | 39.62 (10.62) | 0.0641 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 97.11 (12.56) | 101.83 (12.34) | |
| Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) | 0.94 (0.08) | 0.96 (0.09) | 0.0549 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 82.0 (76–89) | 118 (96–157) | |
| Insulin (uIU/ml) | 7.2 (4.4–10.5) | 9.2 (5.8–13.0) | |
| HOMA-IR | 1.51 (0.87–2.20) | 2.67 (1.76–4.68) | |
| HbA1C (%) | 5.40 (5.2–5.7) | 7.4 (6.20–8.80) | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 193.20 (51.34) | 201.16 (64.12) | 0.288 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 24 (13–37) | 31 (20–44) | |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 123.10 (44.08) | 122.72 (49.77) | 0.9478 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 94.82 (41.51) | 120.28 (59.57) |
Significantly different between cases and controls at p < 0.05 in bold.
P-value for t-test except for variables with for Wilcoxon rank-sums test was used.
indicates median (interquartile range). All other figures are mean (SD).
Figure 1GM composition in controls at the phylum (A) and family (B) levels: the AADM study.
Comparative relative abundances of the gut microbiome's most abundant phyla in controls and cases: the AADM study.
| Firmicutes | 80.07 | 71.18, 86.03 | 76.61 | 69.51, 83.33 | 5.759 | |
| Actinobacteria | 14.80 | 9.25, 22.32 | 16.66 | 10.57, 23.62 | 2.432 | 0.1189 |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.30 | 0.09, 1.07 | 0.44 | 0.18, 1.38 | 3.861 | |
| Proteobacteria | 0.13 | 0.03, 0.60 | 0.18 | 0.05, 0.85 | 2.053 | 0.1519 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.02 | 0.00, 0.98 | 0.15 | 0.00, 2.29 | 3.876 | |
| Tenericutes | 0.47 | 0.09, 1.07 | 0.78 | 0.14, 1.36 | 3.703 | 0.0543 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.00 | 0.00, 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00, 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.9273 |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.04 | 0.00, 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.00, 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.8227 |
| Lachnospiraceae | 25.01 | 19.39, 31.72 | 24.16 | 17.60, 31.56 | 0.315 | 0.5744 |
| Coriobacteriaceae | 10.95 | 6.54, 14.97 | 12.12 | 6.93, 16.25 | 1.19 | 0.2754 |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | 9.27 | 4.48, 15.88 | 10.71 | 5.58, 15.57 | 0.458 | 0.4987 |
| Clostridiaceae | 8.69 | 3.61, 15.73 | 5.50 | 1.14, 12.14 | 9.83 | |
| Ruminococcaceae | 6.65 | 3.62, 11.39 | 7.63 | 3.94, 13.58 | 2.596 | 0.1072 |
| Peptostreptococcaceae | 7.56 | 3.30, 13.53 | 4.62 | 0.77, 10.15 | 12.704 | |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | 0.28 | 0.02, 5.27 | 1.04 | 0.02, 8.16 | 1.049 | 0.3056 |
| Unclassified | 2.68 | 1.79, 3.63 | 2.56 | 1.75, 3.72 | 0.168 | 0.682 |
Values are median (interquartile range) of percentage relative abundance means.
Kruskal-Wallis H test.
P < 0.05 in bold.
Figure 2Alpha diversity of the GM in controls and cases: the AADM study. (A) OTU richness represents the number of OTUs present in each sample. (B) Shannon diversity index accounts for the richness and evenness of OTUs within a sample.
Figure 3Microbiota composition in controls and cases: the AADM study. (A) Shows microbial composition at the phylum level while (B) shows microbial composition at the family level. The most abundant taxa are labeled.
Figure 4Differentially abundant features in cases vs. controls in the AADM study. Each point represents an OTU belonging to each genus. Points are color-coded by phylum.
Feature selection analysis for gut microbiome in cases vs. controls: the AADM study.
| Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriaceae | Collinsella | Unclassified | −3.14 | 1.84 × 10−7 | 4.01 × 10−5 |
| Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriaceae | 94otu12706 | Unclassified | −1.29 | 0.002 | 0.04 |
| Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriaceae | _Adlercreutzia | Unclassified | −1.79 | 9.7 × 10−6 | 0.0008 |
| Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | Anaerostipes | Unclassified | −2.46 | 2.0 × 10−7 | 4.01 × 10−5 |
| Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | Epulopiscium | Unclassified | −2.17 | 0.0008 | 0.02 |
| Firmicutes | – | |||||
| Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | 94otu29676 | Unclassified | 1.14 | 0.0010 | 0.025 |
| Firmicutes | – | |||||
| Firmicutes | Peptostreptococcaceae | 94otu24718 | Unclassified | −1.46 | 0.0006 | 0.02 |
| Firmicutes | Peptostreptococcaceae | Peptostreptococcus | Unclassified | 1.30 | 0.002 | 0.04 |
| Firmicutes | – | |||||
| Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | Clostridium | unclassified | −1.58 | 5.4 × 10−6 | 0.0005 |
| Firmicutes | – | |||||
| Firmicutes | – | |||||
| Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | unclassified | Unclassified | −1.96 | 5.3 × 10−5 | 0.003 |
| Firmicutes | unclassified | unclassified | Unclassified | −2.80 | 0.0001 | 0.007 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | unclassified | Unclassified | 1.19 | 0.0002 | 0.011 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcus | Unclassified | −2.62 | 2.1 × 10−7 | 4.01 × 10−5 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | 94otu17229 | Unclassified | 1.41 | 8.1 × 10−5 | 0.005 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | 94otu6476 | Unclassified | −1.90 | 0.002 | 0.04 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | 94otu27110 | Unclassified | 1.16 | 0.0009 | 0.02 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | 94otu6043 | Unclassified | 1.70 | 5.4 × 10−5 | 0.003 |
| Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | 94otu34076 | Unclassified | 1.07 | 0.0005 | 0.01 |
| Firmicutes | Christensenellaceae | 94otu29530 | Unclassified | 1.24 | 0.0004 | 0.01 |
| Firmicutes | 91otu17987 | 94otu36286 | Unclassified | 2.04 | 0.0004 | 0.01 |
| Firmicutes | 91otu8397 | 94otu30248 | Unclassified | 1.52 | 3.4 × 10−6 | 0.0004 |
| Firmicutes | 91otu9176 | 94otu7814 | Unclassified | 1.31 | 0.0010 | 0.03 |
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichaceae | Eubacterium | Unclassified | 1.48 | 0.002 | 0.045 |
| Firmicutes | Lactobacillaceae | Pediococcus | Unclassified | −1.72 | 0.0007 | 0.02 |
| Proteobacteria | Desulfovibrionaceae | Desulfovibrio | Unclassified | 1.60 | 0.0004 | 0.01 |
| Proteobacteria | ||||||
| Bacteroidetes | Prevotellaceae | Prevotella | Unclassified | 2.66 | 3.5 × 10−7 | 4.5 × 10−5 |
| Bacteroidetes | Paraprevotellaceae | g__94otu4655 | Unclassified | 1.96 | 0.0011 | 0.03 |
| Bacteroidetes | 91otu4650 | g__94otu10519 | Unclassified | 2.87 | 2.2 × 10−8 | 1.7 × 10−5 |
| Bacteroidetes | f__Rikenellaceae | g__94otu34056 | Unclassified | 1.50 | 0.0017 | 0.04 |
In bold are shown the 6 significantly different OTUs with strain level annotation.
Annotates OTUs with the largest fold change (FC) and lower in cases compared to controls.
Figure 5Proportional abundance of the top inferred genes (A) and pathways (B) for controls and cases gut microbiome: the AADM study.
Feature selection analysis for inferred genes in cases vs. controls: list of 16 genes with significant unadjusted p < 0.05 and log2FC≥1.
| K07033 | Uncharacterized protein | 1.34 | 7.3 × 10−5 |
| K06989 | nadX, ASPDH; aspartate dehydrogenase [EC:1.4.1.21] | 1.27 | 0.010 |
| K02230 | cobN; cobaltochelatase CobN [EC:6.6.1.2] | 1.22 | 0.007 |
| K01802 | peptidylprolyl isomerase [EC:5.2.1.8] | 1.13 | 0.008 |
| K16323 | yxjA, nupG; purine nucleoside transport protein | 1.12 | 0.002 |
| K01858 | INO1, ISYNA1; myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase [EC:5.5.1.4] | 1.11 | 0.013 |
| K00641 | metX; homoserine O-acetyltransferase/O-succinyltransferase [EC:2.3.1.31 2.3.1.46] | 1.09 | 0.001 |
| K01278 | DPP4, CD26; dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 [EC:3.4.14.5] | 1.08 | 0.042 |
| K03658 | helD; DNA helicase IV [EC:3.6.4.12] | 1.07 | 0.014 |
| K09005 | Uncharacterized protein | 1.07 | 0.002 |
| K02977 | RP-S27Ae, RPS27A; small subunit ribosomal protein S27Ae | 1.06 | 0.013 |
| K02303 | cobA; uroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase [EC:2.1.1.107] | 1.06 | 0.004 |
| K11031 | slo; thiol-activated cytolysin | 1.05 | 0.006 |
| K02076 | zurR, zur; Fur family transcriptional regulator, zinc uptake regulator | 1.05 | 0.004 |
| K06988 | fno; 8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavin: NADPH oxidoreductase [EC:1.5.1.40] | 1.03 | 0.005 |
| K08170 | norB, norC; MFS transporter, DHA2 family, multidrug resistance protein | 1.02 | 0.001 |