Literature DB >> 32158663

Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes-A Pilot Indian study.

Pirabu Sakthivel1, Chirom Amit Singh1, Alok Thakar1, Geeta Thirumeni1, Sarath Raveendran1, Suresh Chandra Sharma1.   

Abstract

Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial-hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2-5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6-9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial nerve palsy; Masseteric anastomosis; Masseteric-facial anastomosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 32158663      PMCID: PMC7040122          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01758-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  18 in total

1.  Good correlation between original and modified House Brackmann facial grading systems.

Authors:  Douglas K Henstrom; Christopher J Skilbeck; Julie Weinberg; Christopher Knox; Mack L Cheney; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Activation of the masseter muscle during normal smile production and the implications for dynamic reanimation surgery for facial paralysis.

Authors:  Mark Schaverien; Gregory Moran; Ken Stewart; Patrick Addison
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis for early facial reanimation.

Authors:  Federico Biglioli; Alice Frigerio; Valeria Colombo; Giacomo Colletti; Dimitri Rabbiosi; Pietro Mortini; Elena Dalla Toffola; Alessandro Lozza; Roberto Brusati
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; Mara WernickRobinson; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The masseteric nerve: a versatile power source in facial animation techniques.

Authors:  B Bianchi; A Ferri; S Ferrari; C Copelli; L Salvagni; E Sesenna
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Spontaneity of smile after facial paralysis rehabilitation when using a non-facial donor nerve.

Authors:  Bernardo Hontanilla; Alvaro Cabello
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis for facial nerve palsy following surgery for cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Authors:  L F Pitty; C H Tator
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Outcomes and complications of direct end-to-side facial-hypoglossal nerve anastomosis according to the modified May technique.

Authors:  Frederic Venail; Pascal Sabatier; Michel Mondain; François Segniarbieux; Christophe Leipp; Alain Uziel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Early Nerve Grafting for Facial Paralysis After Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection With Preserved Facial Nerve Continuity.

Authors:  Monirah Albathi; Sam Oyer; Lisa E Ishii; Patrick Byrne; Masaru Ishii; Kofi O Boahene
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander W Murphey; William B Clinkscales; Samuel L Oyer
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Donors for nerve transplantation in craniofacial soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  Sishuai Sun; Di Lu; Hanlin Zhong; Chao Li; Ning Yang; Bin Huang; Shilei Ni; Xingang Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.