Literature DB >> 32158661

Effects of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipient Children.

Vishal Gaurav1, Shalabh Sharma1, Satinder Singh1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implantation (CI) is used for rehabilitation of children with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Recently, treatment of such children has been influenced by diagnostic technological advances. Infants and toddlers are now increasingly included for CI. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of 'age at CI' on CI outcome. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of 'age at CI' on CI outcome. In this prospective study at a tertiary care centre, we evaluated 50 cochlear implanted children from October 2011 to March 2013. The case group consists of 15 (30%) children who underwent CI at more than 5 years of age and control group consisted of 35 (70%) children who underwent CI at less than or equal to 5 years age. All patients received auditory and speech rehabilitation and we evaluated their auditory perception outcomes 1 year post CI, the children were assessed by categories of auditory performance (CAP) and meaningful auditory integration scale (MAIS) tests. There were significantly improved mean auditory perception outcomes (increase of 12.29% in CAP, and 14.05% in MAIS scores) at 1 year post CI in CI recipients of age group '5 years or less' in comparison to those who underwent CI at 'more than 5 years of age'. However, children of 'more than 5 years' age at CI, mean CAP and MAIS scores were still more than 80% of maximum achievable CAP and MAIS scores. In this study, CI recipient children who were implanted at less than or equal to 5 years of age were found to have significantly improved auditory perception outcome at 1 year post CI. Hence, it appears preferable to provide CI early. However, even in children who underwent CI at more than 5 years of age, there was substantial improvement in auditory perception outcomes and CI was still helpful in these children. Hence, knowledge of 'age at CI' can provide reasonable help in predicting the auditory perception outcome and optimal counselling of families of CI candidates. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age at cochlear implantation; Auditory perception outcome; Categories of auditory performance; Cochlear implantation; Meaningful auditory integration scale; Sensorineural hearing loss

Year:  2019        PMID: 32158661      PMCID: PMC7040147          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01753-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  17 in total

1.  Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  J Z Sarant; P J Blamey; R C Dowell; G M Clark; W P Gibson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech perception in congenitally deaf children receiving cochlear implants in the first year of life.

Authors:  Bobby A Tajudeen; Susan B Waltzman; Daniel Jethanamest; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Variables affecting implant performance in children.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M J Osberger; S L Todd; A M Robbins; B S Stroer; S Zimmerman-Phillips; A E Carney
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults.

Authors:  Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland; Noel L Cohen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months.

Authors:  Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John K Niparko; Emily A Tobey; Donna J Thal; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Nancy E Fink
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Early identification and cochlear implantation: critical factors for spoken language development.

Authors:  Dianne M Hammes; Michael A Novak; Lee Ann Rotz; Mary Willis; Danielle M Edmondson; Jean F Thomas
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

8.  Cochlear implantation in adolescents with prelinguistic deafness.

Authors:  Elena Arisi; Stella Forti; Davide Pagani; Loredana Todini; Sara Torretta; Umberto Ambrosetti; Lorenzo Pignataro
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation?

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor; Holly K Craig; Stephen W Raudenbush; Krista Heavner; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: Long-term safety and efficacy.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Maura Cosetti; Kevin H Wang; Sara Immerman; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Anatomical Variations, Surgical Difficulties, and Complications Associated with Cochlear Implantation in Different Age Groups of the Pediatric Population of Nepal: A Tertiary Level Hospital-Based Study.

Authors:  Rabindra B Pradhananga; Bigyan R Gyawali; Pabina Rayamajhi; Kripa Dongol; Hari Bhattarai
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-11-07

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.

Authors:  Asuman Alnıaçık; Eda Çakmak; Okan Öz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.