| Literature DB >> 32158521 |
Goren Saenz-Pipaon1,2, Patxi San Martín3, Núria Planell4, Alberto Maillo4, Susana Ravassa2,5,6, Amaia Vilas-Zornoza3,7, Esther Martinez-Aguilar2,8, José Antonio Rodriguez1,2,6, Daniel Alameda3, David Lara-Astiaso9, Felipe Prosper2,3,7,10, José Antonio Paramo1,2,6,10, Josune Orbe1,2,6, David Gomez-Cabrero4, Carmen Roncal1,2,6.
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular events and death and is postulated to be a critical socioeconomic cost in the future. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as potential candidates for new biomarker discovery related to their protein and nucleic acid cargo. In search of new prognostic and therapeutic targets in PAD, we determined the prothrombotic activity, the cellular origin and the transcriptomic profile of circulating EVs. This prospective study included control and PAD patients. Coagulation time (Procoag-PPL kit), EVs cellular origin and phosphatidylserine exposure were determined by flow cytometry in platelet-free plasma (n = 45 PAD). Transcriptomic profiles of medium/large EVs were generated using the MARS-Seq RNA-Seq protocol (n = 12/group). The serum concentration of the differentially expressed gene S100A9, in serum calprotectin (S100A8/A9), was validated by ELISA in control (n = 100) and PAD patients (n = 317). S100A9 was also determined in EVs and tissues of human atherosclerotic plaques (n = 3). Circulating EVs of PAD patients were mainly of platelet origin, predominantly Annexin V positive and were associated with the procoagulant activity of platelet-free plasma. Transcriptomic analysis of EVs identified 15 differentially expressed genes. Among them, serum calprotectin was elevated in PAD patients (p < 0.05) and associated with increased amputation risk before and after covariate adjustment (mean follow-up 3.6 years, p < 0.01). The combination of calprotectin with hs-CRP in the multivariate analysis further improved risk stratification (p < 0.01). Furthermore, S100A9 was also expressed in femoral plaque derived EVs and tissues. In summary, we found that PAD patients release EVs, mainly of platelet origin, highly positive for AnnexinV and rich in transcripts related to platelet biology and immune responses. Amputation risk prediction improved with calprotectin and was significantly higher when combined with hs-CRP. Our results suggest that EVs can be a promising component of liquid biopsy to identify the molecular signature of PAD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Peripheral artery disease; RNA-Seq; extracellular vesicles; liquid-biopsy; thrombosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158521 PMCID: PMC7048174 DOI: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1729646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Extracell Vesicles ISSN: 2001-3078
Figure 2.Characterization of isolated EVs. (a) Representative size distribution histogram for platelet-free plasma derived EVs. The NTA analysis shows a polydisperse heterogeneous vesicle population, the vast majority of them ranging from 100 to 400 nm. (b) Western blot for EVs (Alix and EMMPRIN) and non-EVs markers (ApoB100 and ApoA1) on EVs samples isolated from platelet-free plasma (n = 2). The first line on the left corresponds to the molecular weight marker (MW, kDa) of each detected protein. (c) Representative cryo-electron micrographs of EVs isolated from platelet-free plasma. Panels II and IV correspond to the insets drawn in panels I and II, respectively. EVs are round shaped and delimited by a lipid bilayer. Moreover, smaller electron dense particles (~25 nm) lacking a visible lipid membrane are observed (black arrows), indicating the presence of contaminants such as VLDL or LDL. Scale bar denotes 100 nm. (d) Representative flow cytometry dot-plot for unstained medium/large size EVs isolated from platelet-free plasma within the working gate (in blue). The gate was defined using the violet side scatter (Violet-SSC) against the regular SSC, using calibrated beads of sizes ranging from 0.25 to 1.34 µm as explained in Figure 1(a). (e) Representative dot-plots for gated EVs confronting the fluorescence intensity for FITC vs. APC. Processing of CFSE in EVs gives a positive signal in the FITC channel. Left panel shows no fluorescent signal in unstained EVs, while 80% of CFSE stained EVs are FITC positive (right panel).
Demographic and clinical parameters in controls (Ctrl, n = 100) and PAD patients (n = 317) before, and after classifying PAD by disease severity in intermittent claudication (IC, n = 188) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI, n = 129).
| Ctrl | PAD | | IC | CLI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male, %) | 61 | 88 | <0.001 | 89 | 86 | 0.459 |
| Age (years) | 71(8) | 70(11) | 0.233 | 68(10) | 73(11) | <0.001 |
| Smokers (%) | ||||||
| Never | 51 | 19 | <0.001 | 13 | 29 | 0.002 |
| Current | 4 | 33 | 37 | 28 | ||
| Former | 45 | 48 | 50 | 43 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 36 | 53 | 0.004 | 38 | 74 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 73 | 75 | 0.725 | 72 | 78 | 0.231 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 76 | 67 | 0.108 | 71 | 62 | 0.084 |
| Anticoagulants | 11 | 13 | 0.667 | 7 | 20 | 0.001 |
| Antiplatelets | 20 | 77 | <0.001 | 81 | 70 | 0.033 |
| ACE inhibitors | 16 | 34 | <0.001 | 33 | 36 | 0.692 |
| ARA-2 | 42 | 27 | 0.003 | 24 | 30 | 0.212 |
| Calcium antagonists | 11 | 22 | 0.017 | 18 | 28 | 0.028 |
| Vasodilators | 0 | 6 | 0.247 | 6 | 7 | 0.685 |
| β-Blockers | 17 | 26 | 0.079 | 25 | 26 | 0.786 |
| Statins | 58 | 69 | 0.041 | 72 | 64 | 0.130 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/mL) | 179(44) | 172(45) | 0.260 | 184(42) | 156(43) | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 99(38) | 107(83) | 0.317 | 111(76) | 103(94) | 0.426 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 87(38) | 44(15) | <0.001 | 48(14) | 37(13) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 118(57) | 147(83) | 0.001 | 152(91) | 141(71) | 0.279 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L)a | 1.8(3) | 4.6(10) | <0.001 | 3.2(4.7) | 9.7(20) | <0.001 |
Mean (SD) is shown. aLogarithmically transformed variables are presented as median (Interquartile range). ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARA-2: angiotensin II receptor antagonist, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C reactive protein.
Figure 1.Platelet-derived EVs are most abundant in PAD patients. (a) Gate definition for flow cytometry analysis on platelet free-plasma using the violet side scatter (Violet-SSC) against the regular SSC. The gate was established using calibrated beads ranging from 250 nm to 1.34 µm. (b) The number and cellular origin of EVs was measured in platelet-free plasma of PAD patients by flow cytometry (n = 45). Specific antibodies for: platelets (PEVs, anti-CD41/CD61 in grey), erythrocytes (EryEVs, anti-CD235a in red), endothelial cells (EndEVs, anti-CD62E in green), and leukocytes (LeuEVs, anti-CD11b in blue) were used. Platelet derived EVs were most abundant followed by erythrocyte, endothelial and leukocyte derived EVs. Data are presented as EVs/µL. (c) Combined flow cytometry analysis for EVs cellular origin and Annexin V staining in platelet-free plasma of PAD patients. Annexin V percentage was calculated for each EVs subpopulation based on the total number of platelet, erythrocyte, endothelial and leukocyte EVs numbers respectively. (d) Correlation between the clotting time of platelet-free plasma, measured by the Procoag-PPL kit, and the number of platelet-derived EVs (PEVs, log transformed) in PAD patients (n = 43). *p < 0.01 vs. PEVs. #p < 0.01 vs. EryEVs. †p < 0.01 vs. EndEVs.
Figure 3.Downstream analysis of differential expression results in EVs. (a) Schematic overview of EVs isolation by high-speed centrifugation from platelet-free plasma. Poly-A transcripts were captured using magnetic beads and scRNA-Seq libraries were generated following an adapted protocol from Jaitin et al, [16]. Libraries were sequenced (Illumina NextSeq 500) and data questioned with an optimized bioinformatics workflow for data pre-processing and analysis. (b) Volcano plots showing the differentially expressed genes of the contrasts performed by LimmaVoom. In red, genes with a fold-change (log2) and p-value higher than 1.5 and 0.01, respectively. In green, genes that show differential expression in the CLI vs control contrast. (c) Hierarchical clustering (Euclidean distance) and heatmap imaging of the 15 differentially expressed genes in control and PAD patients (n = 12/group). Samples are arranged in columns (control in green, IC in orange and CLI in pink) and genes in rows. Up-regulated expression is shown in red and downregulated expression in blue. The heatmap was generated using counts per million expression values (CPM, logarithmically transformed) after adjustment for batch, sex and age. (d) mdGSA function enrichment network visualization by Cytoscape. Upregulated gene-sets (Gene Ontologies) for two contrasts are shown; IC vs. control in orange, and CLI vs. control in blue. Nodes size is proportional to number of genes, and edge thickness to degree of similarity between nodes.
Differentially expressed genes after transcriptomic analysis of circulating EVs. Controls (Ctrl, n = 12), intermittent claudication (IC, n = 12) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI, n = 12).
| Fold-Change (Log2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensembl ID | Gene name | IC vs. | CLI vs. Ctrl | CLI vs. | AveExpr | Limma | Kruskal–Wallis |
| ENSG00000104964 | AES | −1.28 | −1.06 | 0.22 | 9.00 | 0.0020 | 0.0023 |
| ENSG00000129255 | MPDU1 | −0.39 | 2.76 | 3.16 | 3.65 | 0.0003 | 0.0002 |
| ENSG00000172349 | IL16 | −3.54 | −1.14 | 2.39 | 4.86 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 |
| ENSG00000126698 | DNAJC8 | 0.90 | 3.08 | 2.18 | 4.99 | 0.0023 | 0.0032 |
| ENSG00000167644 | C19orf33 | 1.48 | 2.65 | 1.17 | 4.65 | 0.0028 | 0.0034 |
| ENSG00000108829 | LRRC59 | 1.18 | 3.17 | 1.99 | 3.72 | 0.0011 | 0.0044 |
| ENSG00000163736 | PPBP | 1.99 | 0.89 | −1.10 | 10.18 | 0.0009 | 0.0012 |
| ENSG00000169727 | GPS1 | −0.53 | −3.66 | −3.13 | 5.05 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| ENSG00000161920 | MED11 | −3.54 | −3.64 | −0.10 | 3.70 | 0.0001 | 0.0004 |
| ENSG00000163220 | S100A9 | 0.70 | 1.71 | 1.01 | 13.43 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| ENSG00000101335 | MYL9 | 1.89 | 2.03 | 0.13 | 8.16 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 |
| ENSG00000128245 | YWHAH | 0.80 | 3.36 | 2.56 | 4.13 | 0.0007 | 0.0014 |
| ENSG00000107521 | HPS1 | −0.15 | 1.82 | 1.97 | 5.68 | 0.0096 | 0.0034 |
| ENSG00000159496 | RGL4 | −0.58 | 2.40 | 2.98 | 4.83 | 0.0022 | 0.0050 |
| ENSG00000148346 | LCN2 | 1.68 | 3.25 | 1.57 | 5.61 | 0.0009 | 0.0018 |
Genes with p < 0.01 obtained by LimmaVoom and Kruskal–Wallis were considered as differentially expressed. Fold changes (Log2) between the different contrasts is shown (IC vs. control; CLI vs. control; CLI vs. IC), as well as the average gene expression in all the samples (AveExpr).
Figure 4.S100A9 mRNA expression and calprotectin levels in circulating EVs and serum of control and PAD patients. (a) The association between the mRNA levels of S100A9 in EVs measured by RNA-Seq (Y axis, log-transformed), and the serum levels of calprotectin (X axis, log-transformed) determined by ELISA in the same subjects, showed a positive significant correlation between them (n = 35, r = 0.337, p = 0.048). (b, c) Serum calprotectin levels were measured by ELISA in the complete PAD population (n = 317). Increased levels of calprotectin were observed in PAD patients with amputation (b) and MACE1 (c) in the follow-up (mean follow-up 3.6 years). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.001 vs. no event. (d, e) Kaplan-Meier curves for the incidence of amputation (d) and MACE1 (e) in the follow-up. PAD patients were categorized according to the combination of calprotectin (≥7.4 µg/mL) and hs-CRP levels (≥13 mg/L). Group 1: low calprotectin and low hs-CRP; Group 2: either high calprotectin or high hs-CRP, and Group 3: high calprotectin & high hs-CRP. Patients with high levels of calprotectin and hs-CRP (group 3) presented increased risk for amputation and MACE1 than those within groups 1 and 2.
Competing risk analyses (Fine-Gray model) for calprotectin and hs-CRP, and amputation and MACE1 in PAD patients (n = 317).
| Calprotectina (µg/mL) | hs-CRPa (mg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR | 95% CI | SHR | 95% CI | |||
| Unadjusted | 2.49 | 1.54–4.04 | <0.001 | 1.76 | 1.48–2.09 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 2.56 | 1.56–4.19 | <0.001 | 1.82 | 1.52–2.20 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 2.62 | 1.58–4.34 | <0.001 | 1.70 | 1.42–2.05 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 2.57 | 1.58–4.17 | <0.001 | 1.74 | 1.47–2.07 | <0.001 |
| Unadjusted | 1.56 | 1.03–2.35 | 0.034 | 1.53 | 1.35–1.75 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.70 | 1.14–2.54 | 0.009 | 1.48 | 1.28–1.70 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.74 | 1.17–2.58 | 0.006 | 1.46 | 1.28–1.66 | <0.001 |
Sub-Hazard ratios (SHR) are effect sizes for a doubling of serum calprotectin and hs-CRP. Amputation models were adjusted as follows; Model 1: sex, age. Model 2: diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and Model 3: hypertension and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Major adverse cardiovascular events 1 (MACE1, including amputation and CV-death) models were adjusted as follows; Model 1: sex, age. Model 2: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, eGFR. aLogarithmically transformed variable.
Competing risk analyses (Fine-Gray model) for categorized calprotectin and hs-CRP, and amputation and MACE1 in PAD patients (n = 317).
| Calprotectin ≥7.4 µg/mL | hs-CRP >13 mg/L | Combination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR | 95% CI | SHR | 95% CI | SHR | 95% CI | ||||
| No Adj | 7.81 | 3.51–17.4 | <0.001 | 10.5 | 4.21–26.3 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 5.42 | 1.79–16.5 | 0.003 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 26.9 | 9.53–76.0 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Model 1 | 8.12 | 3.57–18.5 | <0.001 | 12.0 | 4.58–31.1 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 5.52 | 1.81–16.8 | 0.003 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 28.9 | 10.4–80.7 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Model 2 | 8.22 | 3.68–18.3 | <0.001 | 9.69 | 3.79–24.8 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 5.46 | 1.78–16.7 | 0.003 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 25.6 | 8.71–75.3 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Model 3 | 8.26 | 3.75–18.2 | <0.001 | 11.0 | 4.44–27.3 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 5.55 | 1.84–16.8 | 0.002 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 29.6 | 10.6–82.4 | <0.001 | ||||||
| No Adj | 4.13 | 2.32–7.34 | <0.001 | 4.91 | 2.96–8.15 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 2.86 | 1.57–5.21 | 0.001 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 12.0 | 6.19–23.4 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Model 1 | 5.12 | 2.82–9.31 | <0.001 | 4.42 | 2.54–7.69 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 2.70 | 1.45–5.01 | 0.002 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 11.7 | 5.86–23.5 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Model 2 | 5.06 | 2.83–9.04 | <0.001 | 4.43 | 2.63–7.47 | <0.001 | |||
| G1: Low Calp & CRP | 1(ref) | ||||||||
| G2: High Calp or CRP | 2.90 | 1.63–5.18 | <0.001 | ||||||
| G3: High Calp & CRP | 11.6 | 5.74–23.3 | <0.001 | ||||||
Sub-Hazard ratios (SHR). Amputation models were adjusted as follows; Model 1: sex, age. Model 2: diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and Model 3: hypertension and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Major adverse cardiovascular events 1 (MACE1, including amputation and CV-death) models were adjusted as follows; Model 1: sex, age. Model 2: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, eGFR.
Figure 5.S100A9 expression on human femoral EVs and arterial tissue. (a) S100A9 mRNA was detected by RT-qPCR in EVs from conditioned medium of human femoral atherosclerotic plaques ex vivo (n = 3), and locally in femoral atherosclerotic tissues (n = 3). EVs were pretreated with proteinase K and RNase before RNA isolation to eliminate possible RNA contaminants from non-EVs sources. Data are presented as Ct values. (b, c) Representative western blots for S100A9 in EVs from femoral plaques (panel b, n = 2) and in atherosclerotic femoral tissue (panel c, n = 3). We were able to detect the monomers of S100A9 (≈14 kDa, black arrow), and also found bands at higher sizes (≈24 to 70 kDa) corresponding to the heterodimeric, trimeric or tetrameric forms of S100A9.