| Literature DB >> 32158508 |
Nam Tran1,2, An Le1,2, Minh Ho1,2, Nhi Dang1,2, Huong Ha Thi Thanh1,2, Long Truong1,2, Dai Phu Huynh2,3, Nguyen Thi Hiep1,2.
Abstract
Constructing satisfied small-diameter vascular graft (diameter less than 6 mm) remains an unsolvable challenge in vascular tissue engineering. This study described the fabrication of electrospun polyurethane/polycaprolactone (PU/PCL) membranes chemically grafted with various densities of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) - an antithrombotic fatty acid - for making small-diameter blood vessel. Differences in mechanical, antithrombotic properties and biocompatibility of the membranes resulting from the CLA-grafting procedure were the focus of the study. Investigation of mechanical properties relevant to vascular graft application revealed that these properties of the membranes remained unaffected and satisfied clinical criteria following the CLA graft. Blood-membrane interaction assays showed that the CLA-grafted membranes mitigated the adhesion of blood cells, as well as preventing blood coagulation. These effects were also commensurate with increasing density of CLA, suggesting an effective approach to improve antithromboticity. Cellular tests suggested that CLA has an optimal density at which it promoted cell proliferation on the surface of the membranes; however, excessive presence of CLA might cause undesirable inhibition on cells. In conclusion, PU/PCL membrane grafted with CLA could be a prospective material for vascular tissue engineering with further development and investigation.Entities:
Keywords: 211 Scaffold / Tissue engineering/Drug delivery; 212 Surface and interfaces; 503 TEM; SEM; STEM; Vascular graft; conjugated linoleic acid; electrospinning; hemocompatibility; synthetic polymer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158508 PMCID: PMC7033711 DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2020.1718549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Figure 1.Scheme of CLA grafting process on the PU/PCL electrospun surface
Fabrication parameters of the samples and experimental density of CLA on surface of PU/PCL. Data presented as average ± S.D
| Sample | Plasma treated | CLA coated | Maximum CLA density [nmol/cm2] | EDC immersion and EDC concentration [mM] | Experimental CLA density [nmol/cm2] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PU/PCL | No | 0 | |||
| PU/PCL Plasma | X | No | 0 | ||
| C2-E0 | X | X | 200 | No | 3.9 ± 0.7 |
| C2-E4 | X | X | 200 | Yes, 4 | 17 ± 2 |
| C2-E8 | X | X | 200 | Yes, 8 | 24 ± 2 |
| C2-E12 | X | X | 200 | Yes, 12 | 28 ± 4 |
Figure 2.(a) SEM images of the membranes. (b) Contact angle of the water droplet on the surface of the membranes. The images illustrate the contact angle closest to the mean value of its sample. *: p < 0.05
Mechanical properties of membranes. Data were presented as average ± SD (n = 3)
| Sample | Peak stress [MPa] | Strain at break [%] | Yield stress [MPa] | Suture retention strength [N] | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PU/PCL | 21.6 ± 0.9 | 239 ± 8 | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 2.02 ± 0.08 | – |
| PU/PCL- Plasma | 20.5 ± 0.8 | 242 ± 9 | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 2.05 ± 0.02 | – |
| C2-E4 | 19.9 ± 0.9 | 242 ± 3 | 8.4 ± 1.1 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | – |
| C2-E8 | 20.1 ± 0.8 | 247 ± 6 | 8.6 ± 1.2 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | – |
| C2-E12 | 20.9 ± 0.5 | 241 ± 6 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 2.06 ± 0.03 | – |
| Saphenous vein | 6 ± 4 | 83 ± 19 | NA | 1.96 ± 0.02 | [ |
| Internal mammary artery | 4 ± 2 | 59 ± 15 | NA | 2.0 ± 1.2 | [ |
Figure 3.(a) Percentage of blood cells retained in EDTA whole blood after exposure to membranes. (b) Clotting behavior of blood exposed to the surface of PU/PCL membranes. Glass surface was used as control. ns: p > 0.05; *: p < 0.05. (c) SEM images of adhered platelets on surface of membranes
Figure 4.(a) Cell viability in different concentrations of extract solution of PU/PCL membranes. (b) SEM images of seeded cells proliferated on the surface of PU/PCL and C2-E8 after 7 days of incubation, (c) Proliferation of L929 fibroblast cells on the surface of PU/PCL membranes. (d) Proliferation of BAEC cells on the surface of PU/PCL membranes., #, a: Label of statistical significance (p < 0.05). Difference between samples with the same label is not statistically significant