| Literature DB >> 32158499 |
Kiruthika Thangavelu1, Pugalendhi Sundararaju1, Naganandhini Srinivasan2, Iniyakumar Muniraj3, Sivakumar Uthandi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Without sufficient alternatives to crude oil, as demand continues to rise, the global economy will undergo a drastic decline as oil prices explode. Dependence on crude oil and growing environmental impairment must eventually be overcome by creating a sustainable and profitable alternative based on renewable and accessible feedstock. One of the promising solutions for the current and near-future is the substitution of fossil fuels with sustainable liquid feedstock for biofuel production. Among the different renewable liquid feedstock's studied, wastewater is the least explored one for biodiesel production. Sago wastewater is the byproduct of the cassava processing industry and has starch content ranging from 4 to 7%. The present investigation was aimed to produce microbial lipids from oleaginous yeast, Candida tropicalis ASY2 for use as biodiesel feedstock and simultaneously decontaminate the sago processing wastewater for reuse. Initial screening of oleaginous yeast to find an efficient amylolytic with maximum lipid productivity resulted in a potent oleaginous yeast strain, C. tropicalis ASY2, that utilizes SWW as a substrate. Shake flask experiments are conducted over a fermentation time of 240 h to determine a suitable fatty acid composition using GC-FID for biodiesel production with simultaneous removal of SWW pollutants using ASY2.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiesel; Lipid production; Oleaginous yeast; Sago wastewater; Starch
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158499 PMCID: PMC7057646 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01676-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Physicochemical characteristics of raw SWW
| SWW parameters | Values (g L−1) |
|---|---|
| pH | 4.67 (± 0.03) |
| EC dS m-1 | 6.30 (± 0.04) |
| Salinity | 4.86 (± 0.01) |
| TDS | 4.16 (± 0.02) |
| TS | 4.57 (± 0.01) |
| Starch | 10.00 (± 0.07) |
| TN | 0.54 (± 0.001) |
| BOD | 5.04 (± 0.08) |
| COD | 70.67 (± 0.06) |
| NO3 (mg L−1) | 3.10 (± 0.02) |
| NH4 (mg L−1) | 5.48 (± 0.05) |
| PO4 (mg L−1) | 611.67 (± 0.01) |
| Cyanide (mg L−1) | 4.46 (± 0.02) |
EC electrical conductivity, dS mdeciSiemens per meter, TDS total dissolved solids, TS total solids, TN total nitrogen, BOD biological oxygen demand, COD chemical oxygen demand, NO nitrate, NH ammonium, PO phosphate
Fig. 1a Amylase activity of the yeast isolates from SWW in starch agar medium b Fluorescence microscopic images of Nile red-stained yeast isolates from SWW
Fig. 2a Lipid accumulation and starch utilization by yeast isolates in synthetic medium. b Lipid accumulation and starch utilization by yeast isolates in sago wastewater. The same alphabet letter represented in the top of the bar is not significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT)
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree constructed using the sequence homology of NL region of the yeast isolate using the neighbor-joining method
Comparative evaluations of different industrial wastewaters for the lipid production by oleaginous yeasts
| Wastewater type | Oleaginous yeast | Biomass yield (g L-1), lipid yield | Lipid productivity (g L−1 day−1), incubation period (days) | Nutrient removal efficiency | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monosodium glutamate wastewater | 2.44, 0.2, 9.04 | 0.04, 5 | 85.51% COD | [ | |
| Monosodium glutamate wastewater + 15 g L−1 glucose | 25, 5, 20 | 1.67, 3 | 45% COD | [ | |
| Fishmeal wastewater | 5.34, 1.11, 20.80 | 0.185, 6 | 81.5% COD | [ | |
| Fishmeal wastewater + 20 g L−1 glucose | 17.6, 2.7, 15.3 | 0.45, 6 | 43.4% COD | ||
| Palm oil mill effluent | 4.15, 0.87, 20.97 | 0.29, 3 | 40.50% COD | [ | |
| Palm oil mill effluent (two fold diluted) | 2.78, 1.69, 61 | 0.56, 3 + 3 (two phase) | – | [ | |
| Wastewater after butanol fermentation | 7.4, 0.99, 13.5 | 0.2, 5 | 68% COD | [ | |
| Pulp and paper industry effluent + 70 g L−1glucose | 13.87, 8.56, 61.71 | 1.43, 6 | 77.36% BOD | [ | |
| Cattle livestock wastewater | 2.19, 0.77, 35.3 | – | – | [ | |
| 6.54, 1.89, 28.9 | – | – | |||
| Sago processing wastewater (SWW) | 2.49, 1.21, 48.59 | 0.24, 5 | 83.52% COD; 92.11% BOD; 78.94% cyanide degradation | This study |
Fig. 4Kinetics of lipid and biomass production, starch utilization, and amylase activity obtained during the cultivation of C. tropicalis ASY2 in SWW
Peak assignment in the FTIR spectra for the lipid extract of C. tropicalis ASY2
| Peak no. | Wavenumber | Peak assignment | Main biomolecules |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3010 | =C–H stretching | Lipid |
| 2 | 2955 | C–H asymmetric stretching of –CH3 | Lipid |
| 3 | 2925 | Stretching of >CH2 of acyl chains (asymmetric) | Lipid |
| 4 | 2850 | Stretching of CH2 of acyl chains (symmetric) | Lipid |
| 5 | 1745 | C=O stretching | Lipid |
| 6 | 1680–1640 | Amide I band (C=O stretching) | Protein |
| 7 | 1580–1520 | Amide II (CONH bending) | Protein |
| 8 | 1465 | CH2 deformation | Lipid |
| 9 | 1410 | Amide III band (C–N stretching) | Protein |
| 10 | 1380 | CH3 bending | Lipid |
| 11 | 1240 –1265 | P=O stretching (asymmetric) of >PO2 phosphodiesters | Polyphosphate, phospholipid |
| 12 | 1155 | C–O–C stretching | Lipid |
| 13 | 1080 | P=O stretching (symmetric) of >PO2 | Polyphosphate, phospholipid |
| 14 | 900–1200 | C–O and C–C stretching, C–O–H and C–O–C deformation | Carbohydrate |
| 15 | 875 | P–O–P stretching | Polyphosphate, phospholipid |
| 16 | 725 | CH2 deformation | Lipid |
Fig. 5FTIR analysis of yeast biomass before and after lipid extraction and extracted lipid in SWW
Comparative analyses of fatty acids of C. tropicalis ASY2 with crude soybean and jatropha oil
| Type of fatty acids | Soybean oil (%) | Jatropha oil (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 (palmitic acid) | 9.88 | 14.66 | 0.01 |
| C16:1 (palmitoleic acid) | – | 0.94 | 0.07 |
| C18:0 (stearic acid) | 5.06 | 6.86 | 0.18 |
| C18:1 (oleic acid) | 31.14 | 39.08 | 41.33 |
| C18:2 (linoleic acid) | 52.77 | 32.48 | 1.70 |
| C18:3 (α-linolenic acid) | – | – | 3.48 |
| C18:3 (γ-linolenic acid) | 1.14 | 0.30 | 3.1 |
| C20:1 (arachidic acid) | – | – | 11.61 |
| C24:1 (nervonic acid | – | – | 9.72 |
| Saturated fatty acid (SFA) | – | – | 26.99 |
| Unsaturated fatty acid (MUFA + PUFA) | – | – | 59.77 |
Fig. 6a Depletion of ammoniacal (NH4+-N), nitrate (NO3−-N) and phosphate ions (PO43-P) in SWW by C. tropicalis ASY2. b COD, BOD reduction and cyanide degradation in SWW by C. tropicalis ASY2