| Literature DB >> 32158438 |
Feng Xin Yan1, Gui Ru Dong2, Shan Qiang2,3, Yong Jie Niu3, Ching Yuan Hu2,4, Yong Hong Meng2.
Abstract
Microbial oil triacylglycerol (TAG) from the renewable feedstock attract much attention. The oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica has become the most studied for lipid biosynthesis. Fatty acid desaturases catalyze the introduction of a double bond into fatty-acid hydrocarbon chains to produce unsaturated fatty acids. Desaturases are known to enhance lipid accumulation. In this study, we have achieved a significant increase in lipid production and increase the unsaturated fatty acids content in Y. lipolytica. By comparing the expression of the native genes of △-9 stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) and △12 desaturase (△12D), and an exogenous △15 desaturase (△15D) from flax in the strain with deleted peroxisomal biogenesis factor 10 (PEX10) and overexpressed diacylglyceride acyl-transferase (DGA1), we found that the strain with overexpressed △15 desaturase accumulated 30.7% lipid. Simultaneously, we explored the effect of two copies of desaturase genes (12D-SCD, 15D-SCD, 12D-15D) on lipid production, and found co-expression of △12D and △15D accumulated 42.6% lipid. The lipid content was further increased by 56.3% through the deletion of the multifunctional enzyme (MFE1) and the overexpression of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC1). Finally, the lipid productivity of 50 g/L and maximal lipid content of 77.8% DCW are obtained using a 5-L stirred-tank bioreactor during the stationary phase in the engineered YL-10. Our result demonstrated that the △12 and △15 desaturases play an important role in lipid production in Y. lipolytica and provides an effective strategy for biodiesel development.Entities:
Keywords: Yarrowia lipolytica; fatty acid desaturases; lipid production; metabolic engineering; unsaturated fatty acids
Year: 2020 PMID: 32158438 PMCID: PMC7051990 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
| Novagen | ||
| PO1f | MatA, leucine–, uracil–, xpr2-322, axp1-2 | |
| YL-1 | MatA, leucine+, uracil–, xpr2-322, axp1-2, △ | This work |
| YL-2 | YL-1, △ | This work |
| YL-3(SCD+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-4(12D+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-5(15D+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-6(12D+-SCD+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-7(15D+-SCD+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-8(12D+-15D+) | YL-1, | This work |
| YL-9 | YL-1, △ | This work |
| YL-10 | YL-9, | This work |
| pJN44 | Expression vector, leu+, cEN 1-1, TEF, Introl, xpr2 terminator | |
| pJN43 | TEF, Introl, xpr2 terminator | |
| pJN43-SCD | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN43- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN43- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pJN44- | PTEF- | This work |
| pLoxp-ura-loxp | Knock out vector, loxp, ura3, ura3-testR1, ura3-F, loxp, AmpR | |
| p | This work | |
| p | This work | |
| ura-△ | △ | This work |
FIGURE 2Lipid contents and fatty acid profiles of the strains with PEX10 deletion and DGA1 overexpression. (A) The percentage of lipid and fatty acid dry cell weight (Lipid% DCW) was shown for strains PO1f, YL-1, YL-2 cultivated in the media of C:N = 50. (B) Fatty acid profiles of lipid extract from the strains PO1f, YL-1, YL-2 were shown after 6 day shake flask fermentation. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). The asterisks indicate a significant difference compared with the control (**p < 0.01).
FIGURE 6Fermentation characteristics of the YL-10 strains.
FIGURE 5Combinatorial analysis of the PO1f, YL-8(12D+-15D+), YL-9, and YL-10 strains. (A) The percentage of lipid and fatty acid dry cell weight (Lipid% DCW) was shown for strains PO1f, YL-8(12D+-15D+), YL-9, YL-10 cultivated in the media of C:N = 50. (B) Relative quantification of RNA transcripts using real-time PCR. ACTIN was used as the reference gene. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). The data are normalized by the transcription level of genes in PO1f, except for △15D, which is normalized by the transcriptional level in YL-9. Red box: the transcriptional levels of △15D in YL-9 and YL-10 were calculated using the 2–△ct calculation (△ct = CT, Target − CT, Actin). (C) Imaging analyses of the PO1f strain at 48 h of the shake flask fermentation period. (D) Imaging analyses of the YL-10 strain at 48 h of the shake flask fermentation period.
FIGURE 1A schematic illustrating the pathways rewired in Y. lipolytica’s metabolism to drastically increase lipogenesis capacity. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase gene (ACC1): ACC1 catalyzes the first committed step toward lipid biosynthesis, converting cytosolic acetyl-CoA into malonyl-CoA, which is the primary precursor for fatty acid synthesis. Diacylglycerol acyltransferases I gene (DGA1): DGA promotes triacylglycerol (TAG) biosynthesis and transport TAG into the lipid droplet. The multifunctional enzyme gene (MFE1): MFE1 catalyzes both the second and third steps of fatty acid β-oxidation. Peroxisome biogenesis factor 10 (PEX10), a transcription factor necessary for correct peroxisomal biogenesis and morphology. SCD, 12D, and 15D: The fatty acid desaturases catalyze the introduction of double bonds into △9, △12, and △15 fatty-acid hydrocarbon chains to produce unsaturated fatty acids.
FIGURE 3Lipid contents and fatty acid profiles of the strains with the expression of 12D, SCD, and 15D. (A) The percentage of lipid and fatty acid dry cell weight (Lipid% DCW) was shown for strains YL-2, YL-3(SCD+), YL-4(12D+), and YL-5(15D+) cultivated in the media of C:N = 50. (B) Fatty acid profiles of lipid extract from the strains YL-2, YL-3(SCD+), YL-4(12D+), and YL-5(15D+) were shown after 6 day shake flask fermentation. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). The asterisks indicate a significant difference compared with the control (**p < 0.01).
FIGURE 4Lipid contents of the strains with the expression of 12D-SCD, 15D-SCD, and 12D-15D. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). The asterisks indicate a significant difference compared with the control (**p < 0.01).
Fatty acid profiles as a% of total fatty acids.
| 15.88 ± 0.9 | 28.08 ± 2.1 | 19.04 ± 1.4 | 27.52 ± 2.0 | 9.50 ± 1.1 | |
| 14.61 ± 1.0 | 25.22 ± 0.8 | 27.29 ± 1.0 | 24.21 ± 1.2 | 8.66 ± 2.0 | |
| 14.37 ± 0.9 | 23.54 ± 1.1 | 19.29 ± 1.2 | 32.80 ± 0.7 | 10.01 ± 1.0 | |
| 14.49 ± 1.0 | 23.38 ± 0.8 | 31.29 ± 1.5 | 20.51 ± 1.4 | 10.33 ± 1.0 | |