Literature DB >> 32157621

Importance of long-term follow-up after endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and factors leading to surgical management.

Anand Mohapatra1, Seth A Strope2, Nick Liu3, Andrew Winer4, Nicole E Benfante5, Jonathan A Coleman5,6, Joel Vetter2, Katie S Murray7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma often progress to definitive therapy with radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined the rate of progression as well as risk factors for transitions in treatment over time.
METHODS: Retrospective review at two institutions identified patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Patients were assessed for progression to radical nephroureterectomy. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi square analysis. Kaplan-Meier method analyzed the probability of patients not progressing to radical nephroureterectomy. Cox proportional hazards identified factors associated with progression to radical nephroureterectomy.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients had endoscopic management alone and 89 progressed to radical nephroureterectomy. The two groups had similar age, histories of bladder cancer, and Charlson comorbidity index. Positive urinary cytology, ureteroscopic visualization, and biopsy grade were higher in those progressing to RNU (p < 0.001). Hazard modeling demonstrated higher rates of progression to radical nephroureterectomy with positive biopsy (HR 11.8, 95% CI 2.4-59.5, p = 0.003) or visible lesion on ureteroscopy (HR 8.4, 95% CI 3.0-23.9, p < 0.001). Patients with a higher Charlson comorbidity index were less likely to have radical nephroureterectomy. On Kaplan-Meier modeling, the probability of not undergoing radical nephroureterectomy at 2 years and 5 years was 50% and 20%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who progress to radical nephroureterectomy after endoscopic management have fewer comorbid conditions and changes in disease status including visible lesions on ureteroscopy and positive biopsies. The high rate of progression to radical nephroureterectomy reinforces the need for long-term follow-up of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease progression; Endoscopy; Ureteral neoplasms; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32157621      PMCID: PMC7572076          DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02439-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  15 in total

1.  Troubling outcomes from population-level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Nasir Shah; Narhari Timilshina; Neil Fleshner; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  A new proposal to risk stratify urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UTUCs) in a predefinitive treatment setting: low-risk versus high-risk UTUCs.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre Colin; David R Yates
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): systematic review.

Authors:  Mark L Cutress; Grant D Stewart; Paimaun Zakikhani; Simon Phipps; Ben G Thomas; David A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Benoit Peyronnet; Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig; Harman M Bruins; Cathy Yuhong Yuan; Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Bas W G van Rhijn; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  James McKiernan; Rachel Simmons; Jared Katz; Paul Russo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Risk-adapted strategy for the kidney-sparing management of upper tract tumours.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Pierre Colin; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Predictive factors for applicability and success with endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ronald S Suh; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic procedures for the treatment of localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and a systematic review of current evidence from comparative studies.

Authors:  R Yakoubi; P Colin; T Seisen; P Léon; L Nison; G Bozzini; S F Shariat; M Rouprêt
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration.

Authors:  Vitaly Margulis; Shahrokh F Shariat; Surena F Matin; Ashish M Kamat; Richard Zigeuner; Eiji Kikuchi; Yair Lotan; Alon Weizer; Jay D Raman; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of Ureteroscopy in Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeremy Ng Chieng Hin; Dinul Hettiarachchilage; Paul Gravestock; Bhavan Rai; Bhaskar K Somani; Rajan Veeratterapillay
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.092

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.