Literature DB >> 32157601

A group-specific prior distribution for effect-size heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Christopher G Thompson1, Betsy Jane Becker2.   

Abstract

While both methodological and applied work on Bayesian meta-analysis have flourished, Bayesian modeling of differences between groups of studies remains scarce in meta-analyses in psychology, education, and the social sciences. On rare occasions when Bayesian approaches have been used, non-informative prior distributions have been chosen. However, more informative prior distributions have recently garnered popularity. We propose a group-specific weakly informative prior distribution for the between-studies standard-deviation parameter in meta-analysis. The proposed prior distribution incorporates a frequentist estimate of the between-studies standard deviation as the noncentrality parameter in a folded noncentral t distribution. This prior distribution is then separately modeled for each subgroup of studies, as determined by a categorical factor. Use of the new prior distribution is shown in two extensive examples based on a published meta-analysis on psychological interventions aimed at increasing optimism. We compare the folded noncentral t prior distribution to several non-informative prior distributions. We conclude with discussion, limitations, and avenues for further development of Bayesian meta-analysis in psychology and the social sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian meta-analysis; Between-studies heterogeneity; Prior distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32157601     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01382-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  17 in total

1.  Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  T C Prevost; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An informed reference prior for between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of binary outcomes.

Authors:  Eleanor M Pullenayegum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.

Authors:  Paul C Lambert; Alex J Sutton; Paul R Burton; Keith R Abrams; David R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions.

Authors:  Steven Goodman
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  Grouped random effects models for Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  D T Larose; D K Dey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.

Authors:  Olha Bodnar; Alfred Link; Barbora Arendacká; Antonio Possolo; Clemens Elster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

Authors:  C S Berkey; D C Hoaglin; F Mosteller; G A Colditz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.

Authors:  Kirsty M Rhodes; Rebecca M Turner; Ian R White; Dan Jackson; David J Spiegelhalter; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data.

Authors:  Kirsty M Rhodes; Rebecca M Turner; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.