Douglas I Lin1, Amanda Hemmerich2, Claire Edgerly2, Daniel Duncan2, Eric A Severson2, Richard S P Huang2, Shakti H Ramkissoon3, Yamicia D Connor4, Meghan Shea5, Jonathan L Hecht6, Siraj M Ali7, Jo-Anne Vergilio7, Jeffrey S Ross8, Julia A Elvin7. 1. Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: dlin@foundationmedicine.com. 2. Foundation Medicine Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States of America. 3. Foundation Medicine Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States of America; Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America. 6. Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America. 7. Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America. 8. Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Genomic alterations of BCOR via ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion or BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD) define a subset of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). The goals of this study were to: 1) determine the molecular landscape of BCOR-rearranged ESS, 2) to identify novel BCOR fusion gene partners in ESS and their associated clinicopathological characteristics, and 3) to potentially unravel targetable genomic alterations in BCOR-mutated ESS. METHODS: A retrospective database search of a CLIA-certified molecular laboratory was performed for uterine sarcomas that contained BCOR rearrangements or BCOR ITD. The cases were previously assayed by comprehensive genomic profiling via both DNA- and RNA-based targeted next generation sequencing during the course of clinical care. Clinicopathological and genomic data was centrally re-reviewed. RESULTS: We identify largest cohort of BCOR-rearranged ESS to date (n = 40), which included 31 cases with canonical ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion as well as 8 cases with novel BCOR gene rearrangement partners, such as BCOR-L3MBTL2, EP300-BCOR, BCOR-NUTM2G, BCOR-RALGPS1, BCOR-MAP7D2, RGAG1-BCOR, ING3-BCOR, BCOR-NUGGC, KMT2D-BCOR, CREBBP-BCOR and 1 case with BCOR internal rearrangement. Re-review of cases with novel rearrangements demonstrated sarcomas with spindle, epithelioid or small round cell components and frequent myxoid stromal change. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed high frequency of CDK4 and MDM2 amplification in 38% and 45% of BCOR-rearranged cases, respectively, and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A, which encodes an inhibitor of CDK4 in 28% of cases. Notably, CDK4 and MDM2 amplification was absent in all cases from 15 different ESS cases harboring BCOR ITD. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of CDK4 pathway members, for which targeted therapy is clinically available (i.e. palbociclib), via CDK4 amplification or CDKN2A loss, contributes to the pathogenesis of BCOR-rearranged uterine sarcomas, which may have therapeutic implications.
OBJECTIVE: Genomic alterations of BCOR via ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion or BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD) define a subset of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). The goals of this study were to: 1) determine the molecular landscape of BCOR-rearranged ESS, 2) to identify novel BCOR fusion gene partners in ESS and their associated clinicopathological characteristics, and 3) to potentially unravel targetable genomic alterations in BCOR-mutated ESS. METHODS: A retrospective database search of a CLIA-certified molecular laboratory was performed for uterine sarcomas that contained BCOR rearrangements or BCOR ITD. The cases were previously assayed by comprehensive genomic profiling via both DNA- and RNA-based targeted next generation sequencing during the course of clinical care. Clinicopathological and genomic data was centrally re-reviewed. RESULTS: We identify largest cohort of BCOR-rearranged ESS to date (n = 40), which included 31 cases with canonical ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion as well as 8 cases with novel BCOR gene rearrangement partners, such as BCOR-L3MBTL2, EP300-BCOR, BCOR-NUTM2G, BCOR-RALGPS1, BCOR-MAP7D2, RGAG1-BCOR, ING3-BCOR, BCOR-NUGGC, KMT2D-BCOR, CREBBP-BCOR and 1 case with BCOR internal rearrangement. Re-review of cases with novel rearrangements demonstrated sarcomas with spindle, epithelioid or small round cell components and frequent myxoid stromal change. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed high frequency of CDK4 and MDM2 amplification in 38% and 45% of BCOR-rearranged cases, respectively, and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A, which encodes an inhibitor of CDK4 in 28% of cases. Notably, CDK4 and MDM2 amplification was absent in all cases from 15 different ESS cases harboring BCOR ITD. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of CDK4 pathway members, for which targeted therapy is clinically available (i.e. palbociclib), via CDK4 amplification or CDKN2A loss, contributes to the pathogenesis of BCOR-rearranged uterine sarcomas, which may have therapeutic implications.
Authors: David J Pisapia; Kentaro Ohara; Rohan Bareja; David C Wilkes; Erika Hissong; Jaclyn A Croyle; Joon-Hyung Kim; Jad Saab; Theresa Y MacDonald; Shaham Beg; Catherine O'Reilly; Sarah Kudman; Mark A Rubin; Olivier Elemento; Andrea Sboner; Jeffrey Greenfield; Juan Miguel Mosquera Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 7.801