| Literature DB >> 32154435 |
Gulunay Kiray1,2, Micah Rapata1, Dianne Sharp2, Andrea L Vincent1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of two families with cone dystrophy with supernormal rod responses (CDSRR) presenting with a pseudodominant inheritance of disease. OBSERVATIONS: Three affected members from each family were ascertained. Family 1 of Egyptian ancestry showed consanguinity, and Family 2 was of Northern Iraqi ancestry. Both families showed pseudodominance in their pedigrees.Individuals presented with reduced visual acuity and nyctalopia. Macular disturbances were present in all, varying from a decreased foveal reflex to geographic atrophy. Electrophysiology showed reduced scotopic b-wave amplitudes and prolonged implicit times, and characteristic elevated b-wave amplitudes with high intensity flashes in all individuals.Genetic analysis of Family 1 identified a complete homozygous deletion of the KCNV2 gene, and in Family 2 a homozygous missense variation of c.562T > A: p.(Trp188Arg). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge this is the first report of pseudodominance of CDSRR, with a novel pathogenic KCNV2 variant present in the second family. Clinicians evaluating these individuals should consider autosomal recessive disease manifesting as pseudodominant inheritance. In such cases, electrophysiology remains essential for making a definitive diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: Cone dystrophy; Electrophysiology; Genetics; KCNV2; Mutation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32154435 PMCID: PMC7057165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ISSN: 2451-9936
Demographics and clinical features of patients with KCNV2 related retinopathy.
| Gender | Age at Exam (years) | BCVA | Refraction | Signs and symptoms | Zygosity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OD | OS | OD | OS | Nyctalopia | Photopsia | Dyschromatopsia | Nystagmus | Tropia | |||||
| Family 1 | |||||||||||||
| IV:1 | M | 40 | 6/24 | 6/18 | −5.75 | −5.25 | + | + | Complete deletion | Homozygous | |||
| V:1 | M | 8 | 6/24 | 6/45 | −4.75 | −5.00 | + | Complete deletion | Homozygous | ||||
| V:3 | F | 3 | 3/7.5 | 3/7.5 | −0.50 | −0.50 | + | Complete deletion | Homozygous | ||||
| V:4 | F | 2 | 6/48 | 6/48 | +0.75 | +1.00 | + | + | Complete deletion | Homozygous | |||
| Family 2 | |||||||||||||
| IV:7 | F | 45 | 6/120 | 6/120 | −3.75 | −2.75 | + | + | + | c.562T > A, (p.Trp188Arg) ✝ | Homozygous | ||
| IV:4 | M | 51 | 6/120 | 6/45 | −6.00 | −4.00 | + | + | + | c.562T > A, (p.Trp188Arg) ✝ | Homozygous | ||
| III:3 | F | 79 | 6/120 | 6/120 | NR | NR | + | c.562T > A, (p.Trp188Arg) ✝ | Homozygous | ||||
Table Legend BCVA=Best Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity; OD = Right Eye; OS = Left Eye; M = male, F = female, + = present.
Refractive error in spherical equivalent ✝Reference Sequence: NM_133497.3:NP_598004.1.
Fig. 1Pedigrees of the two families with Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod response, with genotypes. Filled symbols show affected individuals, solid fill = examined, dashed fill = reported with high myopia and poor vision. Numbers within the symbols indicate the number of siblings, double horizontal line represents consanguinity. Asterisk = examined patients, arrows mark the proband. Genotypes are given for all affected individuals.
Fig. 2Retinal images (a–f) and electrophysiology (g) of affected family members with fundus photographs, autofluorescence (FAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. (Spectralis HRA + OC) (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and Ultrawide field fundus photography (Optos plc, Dumferline, UK). Family 1: (a–c) IV:1(a) demonstrating minimal retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) changes and parafoveal ring of hyperFAF with central ellipsoid photoreceptor (PR) loss on OCT. (b) V:1 showing subtle changes of decreased foveal reflex, faint parafoveal increased AF, and PR irregularity in ellipsoid zone. (c) V:3 with normal fundus, AF and OCT appearance. Family 2. (d–f) IV:7 (d) demonstrating macular RPE changes with atrophy and pigmentation, speckled hypoAF with hyperAF rim and central PR loss.(e) IV:4 with a well defined area of macular atrophy with associated mottling, speckled hypoAF and central PR loss on OCT (f) III:3 with a large well defined area of geographic atrophy with faint hyperAF surrounding this hypoAF atrophic area. OCT demonstrating extreme PR loss and thinning of retinal layers.
2g. Electrophysiology Family 1; IV:1,V:1 and V:3 (first three columns) and Family 2; IV:7 (fourth column). For V:3 Family 1 (age 3 years), full field ERGs were performed with baby flash stimulus, dilated pupils and paediatric lid electrodes under general anaesthesia. Final column represents normal averaged control ERG traces. The low intensity rod response in scotopic conditions (scotopic dim flash, −25 dB) is reduced and delayed while amplitudes are supernormal at higher intensities. (scotopic standard, 0dB and scotopic maximum, +5dB) Nearly sinusoidal a-wave, the so-called “a-wave squaring” can be detected at scotopic standard and maximum responses of all patients. In photopic conditions bright flash and 30Hz flicker cone responses are significantly decreased and delayed in all patients compared with control.