| Literature DB >> 32154233 |
Estefânia Vangelie Ramos Campos1, Jhones Luiz de Oliveira2, Daniele Carvalho Abrantes2, Carolina Barbára Rogério2, Carolina Bueno2, Vanessa Regina Miranda2, Renata Aparecida Monteiro2, Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto2.
Abstract
Arboviruses such as yellow fever, dengue, chikungunya and zika are transmitted mainly by the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. Especially in the tropics, inefficacy of mosquito control causes arboviruses outbreaks every year, affecting the general population with debilitating effects in infected individuals. Several strategies have been tried to control the proliferation of A. aegypti using physical, biological, and chemical control measures. Other methods are currently under research and development, amongst which the use of nanotechnology has attracted a lot of attention of the researchers in relation to the production of more effective repellents and larvicides with less toxicity, and development of rapid sensors for the detection of virus infections. In this review, the utilization of nano-based formulations on control and diagnosis of mosquito-borne diseases were discussed. We also emphasizes the need for future research for broad commercialization of nano-based formulations in world market aiming a positive impact on public health.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; arboviruses; biosensors; larvicides; nanobiotechnology; vector control
Year: 2020 PMID: 32154233 PMCID: PMC7047929 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1Summary of the main applications of nanotechnology in the control of Aedes aegypti-borne diseases. There are four main areas where nanotechnolgy can be connected: (i) Early stage vector control—The nanodevices for the control of Aedes aegypti can be developed in order to control this pest in its different stages of life. Many studies have developed nanodevices to control the early stages of mosquitoes, i.e., products that exhibit ovicidal and/or larvicidal activity; (ii) Adult vector control—adult insect control is also highly studied form of control through the development of nanoformulations that exhibit larvicidal and/or repellent activity; (iii) Human protection—following the recent epidemic of arboviruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti, many studies have focused on the development of forms of immunization of humans through the development of nanovaccines, and (iv) Diagnosis—the development of nanobiosensors that quickly detect the presence of arboviruses in the host, thus expediting the decision for the most effective treatment.
Figure 2Major constituents of a biosensor for arboviruses detection and control. Different kinds of samples (blood, urine, saliva) can be used to detect analytes such as NS1 antigen and IgM antidengue, zika, and/or chikungunya antibodies. The analytes can interact with bioreceptors (aptamers, gold nanoparticles, glycan, fluorophores, enzymes, viral antigens, nucleic acids, and polyclonal antibodies for instance) that are connected to transducers and the signal converted and amplified in order to monitor the arboviruses.
Figure 3Illustration of detection mechanism of the detection of dengue-1 RNA using dextrin-capped AuNP as label in a POC device. (A) Formation of AuNP/rDNA-RNA-dDNA sandwich complex. (B) Schematic of visual detection. Reprinted with permission from Yrad et al. (2019). Visual detection of dengue-1 RNA using gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor. Diagnostics 9:74.
Figure 4(A) Illustration of possible mechanism for the preparation of Fe-MPA-NCC-CTAB composite aiming the dengue virus recognition (B) The sensor functionalization. (a) Surface activation of gold/Fe-MPA-NCC-CTAB layer, (b) Immobilize the IgM antibody via EDC-NHS cross-linker, (d) Injection of dengue E-protein solution. Reprinted with permission from Omar et al. (2018). Development of an optical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance phenomenon for diagnosis of dengue virus E-protein, Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 20, 16–21.
Main biosensors developed for the detection of arboviruses, together with their operational principles and applications.
| Electrochemical biosensor based on surface imprinted polymers | zika | 2 × 10−4 | – | Buffer | Tancharoen et al., |
| 2 × 10−3-5 × 10−2 PFU.mL−1 | Serum | ||||
| Magneto-enzyme LFIA combining super-paramagnetic nanoparticles | DENV-1 | 0.25 ng.mL−1 | 90 min | Serum | Thanh et al., |
| DENV-2 | 0.1 ng.mL−1 | ||||
| DENV-3 | 0.25 ng.mL−1 | ||||
| DENV-4 | 1.0 ng.mL−1 | ||||
| Nitrogen-doped porous carbon-based fluorescence sensor | zika RNA | 0.23 nM | 40–80 min | Saliva | Li et al., |
| Paper-plastic microfluidic hybrid chip integrated with a lateral flow immunoassay | Dengue | 84.66 ng.mL−1 | <2 min | Spiked buffer | Yuzon et al., |
| Trapezoidal SiNWs array fabricated by AFM-LAO | Dengue | 2.22 fM | Real-time | DNA | Yusoh et al., |
| Aptamer–gold nanoparticle conjugates | zika | 10 ng | Real-time | Bosak et al., | |
| Acrylic-based genosensor (DNA biosensor) | Dengue (DEN-2) | 1.21 × 10−16 M | 30 min | Blood | Mazlan et al., |
| Urine | |||||
| Saliva | |||||
| Gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor | Dengue | 0.01 μM | 20 min | Synthetic dengue-1 target | Yrad et al., |
| 1.2 × 104 | Pooled Human Sera | ||||
| Fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay | zika (NS1) | 0.045 ng.mL−1 | 20 min | Buffer | Rong et al., |
| 0.15 ng.mL−1 | Serum | ||||
| Localized surface plasmon resonance immunosensors | Dengue (4 serotypes) | 107 TCID50.mL−1 | <5 min | – | Basso et al., |
| Two-dimensional MoS2 nanosheets-based disposable biosensor (electrochemical detection) | Chikungunya | 3.4 nmol.L−1 | <60 min | PBS serum | Singhal et al., |
| Paper-based DNA biosensor using gold shell-coated magnetic nanocubes | Chikungunya | 0.1 nmol.L−1 | – | PBS serum | Singhal et al., |
| Laser-cut microfluidic device made of glass-fiber paper | Non-structural 1 (NS1) viral protein and specific IgM | 25 ng.mL−1 | <10 min | Blood and plasma | Theillet et al., |
| Graphene-based biosensor employing precise immobilized monoclonal antibody | zika | 450 pmol.L−1 | 5 min | – | Afsahi et al., |
| Electrochemical immunosensor | Dengue | 0.3 ng.mL−1 | – | Serum | Nawaz et al., |
| Reverse-transcription LAMP coupled with reverse dot blot | zika | <2 × 103 (6 RNA copies per reaction) | Between 3 and 10 min | Saliva | Sabalza et al., |
| Multiplex tools with target-specific fluorescently tagged strand displaceable probes with RT-LAMP | Dengue | ~1.22 PFU equivalent viral RNAs | 30 min | Urine and plasma | Yaren et al., |
| zika | ~0.71 PFU equivalent viral RNAs | ||||
| Chikungunya | ~38 copies of viral RNA | ||||
| Electrochemical stand with electrospun semi-conducting manganese (III) oxide (Mn2O3) nanofibers for DNA hybridization detection | Dengue | 120 × 10−21 mol.L−1 | – | Spiked serum | Tripathy et al., |
| Electrochemical capacitive sensing | Dengue | 0.5 ng.mL−1 | – | Serum | Cecchetto et al., |
| zika | |||||
| Chikungunya | |||||
| Coupling of reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) with the quenching of unincorporated amplification signal reporters (QUASR) technique | Dengue | 103.4 copies.μL−1 | <40 min | Blood, urine, and saliva | Priye et al., |
| zika | 105-102 PFU equivalent.mL−1 | 7–15 min | |||
| Chikungunya | |||||
| Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy | zika (NS1) | 0.72 ng.mL−1 | 20 min | Serum | Sánchez-Purrà et al., |
| Dengue | 7.67 ng.mL−1 | ||||
| Bead-based immunofluorescence assay on a microfluidic dielectrophoresis platform | Dengue | 104 PFU.mL−1 | 5 min | – | Iswardy et al., |
| Optical caustic plasmonic light scattering sensor | Dengue | 50 pg.mL−1 | 15 min | Serum | García et al., |
| Carbon nanotube-based chemiresistor functionalized with heparin | Yellow fever | 8.4 × 102 | 10 min | – | Wasik et al., |
| Dengue | |||||
| Multiplexed assay on a nanostructured plasmonic gold (pGOLD) platform | zika (NS1) | 0.33 IgG level | 120 min | Serum | Zhang et al., |
| 0.30 IgA level | |||||
| Reverse transcription strand invasion-based amplification (RT-SIBA) with fluorescence detection | zika | 5,000 copies.mL−1 | <30 min | Lysis buffer | Eboigbodin et al., |
| Detection using isothermal amplification, AC susceptometry, and magnetic nanoparticles | zika virus oligonucleotide | 1 aM | 27 min | Serum | Tian et al., |
| Reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) | zika | 50–100 PFU.mL−1 | 40 min | Saliva | Song et al., |
| Lateral flow assay using multicolored silver nanoparticles | Dengue | 150 ng.mL−1 | – | Blood | Yen et al., |
| Carbon nanotube-ink printed electrode | Dengue | 12 ng.mL−1 | – | Serum | Dias et al., |
| Optical DNA biosensor based on square-planar ethyl piperidine substituted nickel (II) salphen complex | Dengue | 0.2 mol.L−1 | 30–120 min | Saliva and urine | Ariffin et al., |
| Microfluidic system combined with microvalves and micropumps for rapid DNA hybridization using shuttle flow | Dengue (4 serotypes) | 100 pmol.L−1 | 90 s | – | Huang et al., |
| Microfluidic chip that accomplish DNA/RNA amplification, sample injection, and separation of nucleic acid products | Dengue | – | <5 min | – | Huang et al., |
| Sensor-based microchip employing a magnetic bead bioassay platform | Dengue (antidengue virus IgG) | 100 pg.mL−1 | – | – | Aytur et al., |
Limit of detection.
Patents related to the detection and control of arboviruses.
| United States | Mikrogen, GmbH | Method for the immunological diagnosis of a sample with a potential infection with an arbovirus and test kits suitable for this purpose | 2019 | US2019/0227065A1 | Soutschek et al., |
| United States | The USA, as represented by the Secretary, Dept. Of health and human services | Compositions and methods for the diagnosis and treatment of zika virus infection | 2017 | WO2018152496A1 | Akahata and Ueno, |
| United States | University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. (UCFRF) | A payload reservoir comprising an insect attractant or insect food source; and (b) A detector conjugate comprising a gold nanoparticle conjugated to a specific detector molecule that binds specifically to a protein present in the saliva of a specific insect to be detected | 2018 | US20180231550A | Willenberg and Seal, |
| United States | The Hong Kong polytechnic university | Microarray design of hybrid upconversion nanoparticles on a nanoporous anodized alumina membrane heterogeneous assay for simultaneous detection of multiple oligonucleotides | 2018 | US2018/0246084 A1 | Hao et al., |
| United States | Sympano, Inc. | Nano-field electrical Sensor for Biomarkes and other targets analytes by determining impedance in bodily fluid on nanoporous membrane | US2018/0067107 A1 | Barrett et al., | |
| China/ United States | Ulisse Biomed SRL | Biosensors for the detection of infection and associated maladies | 2017 | CN106461667A | Braga et al., |
| United States | DexCom, Inc. | Transcutaneous analyte sensor for transcutaneous measurement of glucose in a host | 2018 | US7654956B2 | Brister et al., |
| Spain | Universidad complutense de Madrid | Biosensor for the detection of nucleic acids | 2017 | ES2580138B2 | Cabarcos et al., |
| United States | University of Ottawa, University of Malaya | Long-range surface plasmon-polariton biosensor | 2018 | WO2018090125A1 | Berini and Wong, |
| United States | Florida International University | Electrochemical sensing device based on nano-devices for fast zika Virus detection | 2018 | US10012645B2 | Kaushik and Nair, |
| United States | San Diego State University (SDSU) Foundation | Cell-based devices for track small molecules that restrain enzymes | 2018 | US10006077B2 | Wolkowicz, |
| United States | Eccrine Systems, Inc. | Biosensing device aimed to be used in humans skin to track an infection by one or more antigens | 2018 | WO2018026931A1 | Beech et al., |
| United States | Aviana molecular technologies, LLC | Multiplex acoustical biosensor with higher sensitivity | 2011 | US20110136262A1 | Ragavan et al., |
| United States | Purdue research foundation | Electrochemical biosensor for RNA and DNA sensing | 2017 | US20170107565A1 | Marinero-Caceres et al., |
| United States | Aviana molecular technologies, LLC | Biocoated piezoelectric biosensor platform for point-of-care diagnostic use | 2015 | US20150111765A1 | Laury-Kleintop and Rutner, |
| France/ | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Microfluidic biosensor and methods of use | 2005 | WO2005084404A2 | Baeumner et al., |
| Australia/ | Lifeprint Australia Pty Ltd. | Auto-feedback loop biosensor—signal amplification auto-feedback loop for the detection of a target analyte in a sample | 2009 | WO2009152566A1 | Fletcher and Milligan, |
| United States | UT-Battelle, LLC | Biosensor which has multiple functions and broad spectrum and methods of utilization | 2004 | USOO6743581B1 | Vo-Dinh, |
Formulations based on modified release systems for the encapsulation of active agents with insect repellent properties.
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) | Diethylphenylacetamide (DEPA) | Diameter: 149 ± 1.06 nm; Properties: 5-fold decrease of median lethal indices (LC50), compared to free DEPA | Balaji et al., |
| Polymeric nanospheres | Poly(n-butyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) | N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) | Diameter: 114 ± 37 nm. | Gomes et al., |
| Nanoemulsion | Polaxamer 407 | Ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (IR3535) | Diameter: ± 200 nm; | Pinto et al., |
| Gel/Nanoparticle | Chitosan | Encapsulation efficiency of 96.64%; Properties: Reduction in essential oil permeation in | Sharma, | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Polyethylene glycol | Quercetin | Diameter: 124.0 ± 1.1 nm; Properties: Stability at 4°C, affected larval | Pessoa et al., |
| Polymeric micelles | PEG and PLGA | Pyrethrins | Diameter: 140–320 nm. Properties: Protection against ultraviolet degradation (at 26°C) and high larvicidal activity against | Zhang et al., |
| Polymeric microparticles | Gum arabic | Essential oils and DEET | Diameter: 1–68 mm; Properties: Spherical shapes and cotton fabric impregnated with system presentend better insect repellency, compared to DEET | Eyupoglu et al., |
| Nanoparticles | Chitosan | Diameter: 268 ± 3.4 nm; Encapsulation efficiency 84.8–88.0% | Ferreira et al., | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Polaxamer 407 | Eugenol, 1,8-cineole, geraniol, linalool, carvacrol, α-terpineol, citronellol, thymol, and menthol | Diameter: Around 40 nm; Properties: Mortalities ranging from 30 to 60% against insects with linalool and 1,8-cineole being most effective | Lucia et al., |
| Polymeric microparticles | Cellulose | N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) | Encapsulation efficiency of 98%. | Kadam et al., |
| Inclusion complexes | β-Cyclodextrin | Inclusion complex formation by kneading and co-evaporation with essential oil content ~15%; | Galvão et al., | |
| Polymeric micropartices | Carboxy-methylcellulose (CMC) | Essential oils ( | Diameter: 4–200 μm. Properties: The same period of repellent activity for essential oil encapsulated in comparison with microencapsulated DEET. Extended duration of repellent activity (between 1 and 2 h) compared with commercial formulations | Misni et al., |
| Nanoemulsion | Tween 80 | Diameter: <200 nm; Properties: Nanoemulsion with higher larvicidal activity ( | Balasubramani et al., | |
| Nanoemulsion | Tween 80 | Diameter: 50–300 nm; Properties: Nanoemulsion with potential insecticidal effect against | Ramar et al., | |
| Nanofibrous | Cellulose | Citriodiol (CD) | Properties: Nanofibrous presented more prolonged repellency (34 days) than monolithic ones in experiments using | Muñoz et al., |
Biogenic nanoparticles tested for the control of disease vectors.
| AgNP | Larvicidal property against fourth instar larvae of | Apple extract | AgNPs -T 15.76/27.7 ppm | 24 h | Ali et al., |
| AgNP | Ovicidal activity against | 27.19/52.32 μg.mL−1 | 24 h | Alharbi et al., | |
| AgNP | Larvicidal activity against | Leaf extracts of | 4.02/11.22 mg.mL−1 | 24 h | Elumalai et al., |
| AgNP | Ovicidal activity against | 5.53/12.01 ppm | 72 h | Kumar et al., | |
| ZnONP | Larvicidal and ovicidal activities against | 34.04/78.06 ppm | 24 h | Al-Dhabi and Valan Arasu, | |
| ZnONP | Larvicidal activity against of | Extract of the seaweed | 22.38/41.94 μg.mL−1 | 24 h | Ishwarya et al., |
| ZnONP | Larvicidal activity against fourth instar of | 34.88/64.56 μg.mL−1 | 24 h | Ishwarya et al., | |
| AgNP | Larvicidal property against | 84.2/117.3 ppm | 24 h | Bhuvaneswari et al., | |
| AgNP | Potential larvicidal activity against larvae of | Aqueous leaf extract of | 72.72/126.86 μg.mL−1 | 24 h | Veerakumar et al., |
| AgNP | Larvicidal activity against third and larvae of | Leaf extract of | 3rd instar: 7.0/17.76 mg.mL−1 | 24 h | Kumar et al., |
| AgNP | Larvicidal activity against 1st−4th instar larvae dengue vector | 3,5 di-t-butyl-4 hidroxyanisole isolated from | 1st−4th instar: 2.5; 2.78; 3.02; 3.05/8.28; 7.47;8.13;8.74 μg.mL−1 | 24 h | Ramanibai and Velayutham, |
| AgNP | Larvicidal and pupicidal against | Aqueous leaf filtrate from | 1st−4th instar: 0.46; 0.35; 0.33; 0.21% | 24 h | Nalini et al., |
N/A- data not provided by the autor; LC.