| Literature DB >> 32154225 |
Tamara Posati1, Arthur Listwan2, Giovanna Sotgiu1, Armida Torreggiani1, Roberto Zamboni1, Annalisa Aluigi1.
Abstract
In this work, keratin sponges were prepared by freeze-drying method and tested for adsorption of Azure A and Methyl Orange dyes. The obtained materials showed a porosity of 99.92% and a mean pore size dimension of about 91 μm. The use of oxidized sucrose with a heating treatment at 150°C was demonstrated to be a useful crosslinking procedure alternative to the conventional glutaraldehyde. Keratin sponges showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 0.063 and of 0.037 mmol/g for Azure A and Methyl Orange, respectively. The absorption of the cationic dye Azure A onto keratin sponges was better described by Freundlich model while the isotherm adsorption of the anionic Methyl Orange was found to correlate with both Langmuir and Freundlich models. The mean free energies evaluated by using the D-R model indicated a physisorption of Methyl Orange and a chemisorptions of Azure A onto keratin sponges. Finally, the functionalization of keratin sponges with Zn Al hydrotalcites nanoparticles did not affect the adsorption performances of the adsorbent toward the cationic dye Azure A, while it improved those toward the anionic Methyl Orange, increasing the related removal efficiencies from 43 to 96%. Collectively, the reported data indicates that the combination of keratin with hydrotalcites nanoparticles is a good strategy to obtain more functional adsorbent materials of potential interest for water treatment and purification.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; hydrotalcites; keratin; sponges; water treatment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32154225 PMCID: PMC7047220 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
List of cross-linked keratin sponges.
| KS-GA-24 | Glutaraldehyde 25% | 0.4 μL per mg of keratin | 24 | No |
| KS-S-1 | Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 1 | No |
| KS-S-24 | Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 24 | No |
| KS-S-1-H | Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 1 | Heating |
| KS-S-24-H | Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 24 | Heating |
| KS-OS-1 | Oxidized Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 1 | No |
| KS-OS-24 | Oxidized Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 24 | No |
| KS-OS-1-H | Oxidized Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 1 | Heating |
| KS-OS-24-H | Oxidized Sucrose | 10% vs. keratin | 24 | Heating |
Figure 1Water stability (A) and swelling ability (B) of keratin sponges crosslinked with glutaraldehdye (KS-GA-24), with sucrose for 1 h (KS-S-1) and for 24 h (KS-S-24), even followed by heating treatment (KS-S-1-H and KS-S-24H, repsecitvely) and with oxidized sucrose for 1 h (KS-OS-1) and 24 h (KS-OS-24H), even followed by heating treatment (KS-OS-1-H and KS-OS-24-H, respectively).
Figure 2Optical appearance and SEM image of the section of keratin sponges.
Figure 3(A) Adsorption capacity Q (mmol/L) and (B) Removal Efficiency R (%) as functions of initial dyes concentration.
Parameters for the AzA and MO adsorption on keratin sponges.
| AzA | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 1 ± 1 | 0.94 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.96 | (3.7 ± 0.7) 10−5 | 9.9 ± 0.4 | 0.97 |
| MO | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.020 ± 0.002 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.91 | (4 ± 1) 10−5 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 0.95 |
Figure 4Plots of the fitting of the experimental data with Langmuir and Freundlich (A), and Dubinin-Radushkevich (B) isotherm models.
Figure 5Separation factor for the adsorption of AzA and MO on keratin sponges.
Figure 6Adsorption capacities (A) and Removal Efficiency (B) of KS and KS-HT sponges.
Figure 7Adsorption capacities (A) and Removal Efficiency (B) of KS-HT sponges toward first AzA and then MO and vice versa.