| Literature DB >> 32154006 |
Francesco Venturelli1, Riccardo Masetti1, Marianna Fabi2, Roberto Rondelli1, Anna Martoni1, Arcangelo Prete1, Marco Bonvicini2, Andrea Pession1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxic effects of anthracycline therapy are a major cause of morbidity for childhood cancer survivors. The aim of this retrospective evaluation is to assess the efficacy of Tissue Doppler Imaging in the early detection of myocardial alterations in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Anthracyclines; Cardiotoxicity; Echocardiography; Tissue Doppler imaging
Year: 2018 PMID: 32154006 PMCID: PMC7048119 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-018-0032-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiooncology ISSN: 2057-3804
Fig. 1Pulsed-wave TDI sample volume placement regions
T-test results between patient cohort and control cohort (p < 0,05)
| PATIENTS ( | CONTROLS ( | PATIENTS Z-score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean values (± SD) | mean values (± SD) | mean values (± SD) | ||
| IVSd (cm) | 0.863 (±0.144) | 0.746 (±0.113) | 2.06 (±1.35) | 0.0000 |
| IVSs (cm) | 1.153 (±0.248) | 1.047 (±0.189) | 0.0186 | |
| LVIDd (cm) | 3.995 (±0.519) | 4.104 (±0.586) | −0.57 (±1.32) | 0.3290 |
| LVIDs (cm) | 2.694 (±0.435) | 2.584 (±0.417) | 0.08 (±1.27) | 0.2011 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0.813 (±0.165) | 0.678 (±0.151) | 1.05 (±0.95) | 0.0000 |
| LVPWs (cm) | 1.106 (±0.240) | 1.070 (±0.228) | 0.4460 | |
| FS (%) | 32.52 (±6.28) | 36.95 (±5.15) | 0.0002 | |
| FE (%) | 61.79 (±0.10) | 66.99 (±0.07) | 0.0029 | |
| DECEL TIME (s) | 0.173 (±0.068) | 0.210 (±0.044) | 0.0041 | |
| IVRT (s) | 0.096 (±0.025) | 0.061 (±0.009) | 0.0000 | |
| E (m/s) | 0.865 (±0.150) | 1.035 (±0.172) | 0.0000 | |
| A (m/s) | 0.493 (±0.111) | 0.535 (±0.094) | 0.0458 | |
| E/A RATIO | 1.83 (±0.42) | 1.99 (±0.43) | 0.0732 | |
| LVPWm | ||||
| S (m/s) | 0.096 (±0.027) | 0.069 (±0.022) | 0.0000 | |
| E’ (m/s) | 0.155 (±0.030) | 0.174 (±0.022) | 0.0004 | |
| A’ (m/s) | 0.045 (±0.013) | 0.052 (±0.013) | 0.0111 | |
| E’/A’ RATIO | 3.701 (±1.219) | 3.583 (±1.028) | 0.6022 | |
| E/E’ RATIO | 5.691 (±1.414) | 5.992 (±0.982) | 0.2322 | |
| LVPWb | ||||
| S (m/s) | 0.101 (±0.028) | 0.089 (±0.016) | 0.0132 | |
| E’ (m/s) | 0.181 (±0.023) | 0.207 (±0.039) | 0.0001 | |
| A’ (m/s) | 0.054 (±0.017) | 0.066 (±0.017) | 0.0006 | |
| E’/A’ RATIO | 3.671 (±1.078) | 3.336 (±0.969) | 0.1047 | |
| E/E’ RATIO | 4.791 (±0.984 | 5.107 (±1.054) | 0.1326 | |
| IVSm | ||||
| S (m/s) | 0.059 (±0.010) | 0.058 (±0.009) | 0.7279 | |
| E’ (m/s) | 0.106 (±0.024) | 0.115 (±0.018) | 0.0269 | |
| A’ (m/s) | 0.042 (±0.012) | 0.045 (±0.009) | 0.1438 | |
| E’/A’ RATIO | 2.705 (±0.864) | 2.678 (±0.614) | 0.8569 | |
| E/E’ RATIO | 8.501 (±2.525) | 9.122 (±1.802) | 0.1729 | |
| IVSb | ||||
| S (m/s) | 0.074 (±0.014) | 0.081 (±0.011) | 0.0031 | |
| E’ (m/s) | 0.128 (±0.023) | 0.141 (±0.021) | 0.0045 | |
| A’ (m/s) | 0.049 (±0.013) | 0.054 (±0.011) | 0.0178 | |
| E’/A’ RATIO | 2.830 (±0.938) | 2.684 (±0.616) | 0.3578 | |
| E/E’ RATIO | 6.913 (±1.884) | 7.501 (±1.703) | 0.1116 | |
| MAD | ||||
| S (m/s) | 0.077 (±0.021) | 0.077 (±0.018) | 0.9628 | |
| E’ (m/s) | 0.145 (±0.031) | 0.169 (±0.033) | 0.0002 | |
| A’ (m/s) | 0.050 (±0.020) | 0.059 (±0.018) | 0.0219 | |
| E’/A’ RATIO | 3.405 (±1.732) | 3.065 (±0.930) | 0.2307 | |
| E/E’ RATIO | 6.094 (±1.800) | 6.392 (±2.292) | 0.4873 | |
MAD mitral annular displacement, LVPWm middle left ventricular posterior wall, LVPWb basal left ventricular posterior wall, IVSm middle interventricular septum, IVSb basal interventricular septum
Fig. 2Difference of E’ at basal LVPW between patients who underwent HSCT and those who didn’t
Fig. 3Difference of E’ at middle IVS between patients who underwent HSCT and those who didn’t
Fig. 4Difference of E’ at basal IVS between patients who underwent HSCT and who didn’t
Fig. 5Difference of E’ of basal LVPW between patients who received different total cumulative doses of anthracyclines
Fig. 6Difference of S of basal IVS between patients who received different total cumulative doses of anthracyclines
Fig. 7Trend of E’ values of basal IVS after the end of therapy