Literature DB >> 3215313

Postural adjustments induced by simulated motion of differently structured environments.

W N van Asten1, C C Gielen, J J Denier van der Gon.   

Abstract

We have investigated how visual information of a scene, moving along the line of sight of a subject, affects postural readjustments made by a subject when instructed to maintain an upright posture. Two different types of stimulus patterns were presented each inducing a different optic flow field. In one case an optic flow field was induced by simulating motion of a subject relative to a wall and in the second case by stimulating motion of a subject through a tunnel. In both cases clear effects on postural balance were observed. It suggests that postural responses are invariant for the structure of the moving environment. The amplitude of the postural responses did not depend on the velocity of the simulated motion, and therefore did not depend on the absolute magnitude of the optic flow components. The amount of texture in the moving scene proved to be an important factor. In addition, it was found that the control of postural balance is not exclusively dominated by information provided by the peripheral part of the subject's visual field. Moreover, the results indicate that the divergence component in the optic-flow field alone is not sufficient to control posture in forward/backward direction.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3215313     DOI: 10.1007/bf00248230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Pursuing the perceptual rather than the retinal stimulus.

Authors:  M J Steinbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Suppression of visually evoked postural responses.

Authors:  A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Optic flow.

Authors:  J J Koenderink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Postural movements induced by rotations of visual scenes.

Authors:  W N van Asten; C C Gielen; J J van der Gon
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceived visual motion as effective stimulus to pursuit eye movement system.

Authors:  S Yasui; L R Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects.

Authors:  W M Paulus; A Straube; T Brandt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Postural reactions of dogs to sinusoidal motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  R E Talbott
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-07

10.  Role of foveal and peripheral visual information in maintenance of postural equilibrium in man.

Authors:  B Amblard; A Carblanc
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1980-12
View more
  44 in total

1.  Postural proprioceptive reflexes in standing human subjects: bandwidth of response and transmission characteristics.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; R B Gorman; D Burke; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; J L Taylor; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Detecting postural responses to sinusoidal sensory inputs: a statistical approach.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Jeffrey G Jasko; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  The many roles of vision during walking.

Authors:  David Logan; Tim Kiemel; Nadia Dominici; Germana Cappellini; Yuri Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  The importance of perceived relative motion in the control of posture.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Jack M Loomis; Andrew C Beall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensory re-weighting in human postural control during moving-scene perturbations.

Authors:  Arash Mahboobin; Patrick J Loughlin; Mark S Redfern; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Head sway response to optic flow: effect of age is more important than the presence of unilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Parallel processing of multisensory information concerning self-motion.

Authors:  C Maioli; R E Poppele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dynamic theory of action-perception patterns: the "moving room" paradigm.

Authors:  G Schöner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.