Literature DB >> 32153029

Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Wei Deng1, James E Younkin1, Kevin Souris2, Sheng Huang3, Kurt Augustine1, Mirek Fatyga1, Xiaoning Ding1, Marie Cohilis2, Martin Bues1, Jie Shan1, Joshua Stoker1, Liyong Lin4, Jiajian Shen1, Wei Liu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To commission an open source Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine, "MCsquare" for a synchrotron-based proton machine, integrate it into our in-house C++-based I/O user interface and our web-based software platform, expand its functionalities, and improve calculation efficiency for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).
METHODS: We commissioned MCsquare using a double Gaussian beam model based on in-air lateral profiles, integrated depth dose of 97 beam energies, and measurements of various spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs). Then we integrated MCsquare into our C++-based dose calculation code and web-based second check platform "DOSeCHECK." We validated the commissioned MCsquare based on 12 different patient geometries and compared the dose calculation with a well-benchmarked GPU-accelerated MC (gMC) dose engine. We further improved the MCsquare efficiency by employing the computed tomography (CT) resampling approach. We also expanded its functionality by adding a linear energy transfer (LET)-related model-dependent biological dose calculation.
RESULTS: Differences between MCsquare calculations and SOBP measurements were <2.5% (<1.5% for ~85% of measurements) in water. The dose distributions calculated using MCsquare agreed well with the results calculated using gMC in patient geometries. The average 3D gamma analysis (2%/2 mm) passing rates comparing MCsquare and gMC calculations in the 12 patient geometries were 98.0 ± 1.0%. The computation time to calculate one IMPT plan in patients' geometries using an inexpensive CPU workstation (Intel Xeon E5-2680 2.50 GHz) was 2.3 ± 1.8 min after the variable resolution technique was adopted. All calculations except for one craniospinal patient were finished within 3.5 min.
CONCLUSIONS: MCsquare was successfully commissioned for a synchrotron-based proton beam therapy delivery system and integrated into our web-based second check platform. After adopting CT resampling and implementing LET model-dependent biological dose calculation capabilities, MCsquare will be sufficiently efficient and powerful to achieve Monte Carlo-based and LET-guided robust optimization in IMPT, which will be done in the future studies.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mcsquare; Monte Carlo method; dose calculation; intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT); robust optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32153029     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  How can we consider variable RBE and LETd prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Anthony Vela; Pauline Dutheil; Paul Lesueur; Dinu Stefan; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Amir Abdollahi; Andrea Mairani; Thomas Tessonnier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Empirical Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Mandible Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Pencil-Beam-Scanning Proton Therapy (PBSPT): A Retrospective, Case-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yunze Yang; Olivia M Muller; Satomi Shiraishi; Matthew Harper; Adam C Amundson; William W Wong; Lisa A McGee; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Steven E Schild; Martin Bues; Mirek Fatyga; Justin D Anderson; Samir H Patel; Robert L Foote; Wei Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning.

Authors:  Chengyu Shi; Haibo Lin; Sheng Huang; Weijun Xiong; Lei Hu; Isabelle Choi; Robert Press; Shaakir Hasan; Charles Simone; Arpit Chhabra
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

4.  Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Hongying Feng; Terence T Sio; William G Rule; Ronik S Bhangoo; Pedro Lara; Christopher L Patrick; Shawn Korte; Mirek Fatyga; William W Wong; Steven E Schild; Jonathan B Ashman; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.243

5.  Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Chunbo Liu; Meng Wei Ho; Jiyeon Park; Wen Chien Hsi; Xiaoying Liang; Zuofeng Li; Yuntao Song; Hansheng Feng; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.