Literature DB >> 32152091

Appropriateness of peripherally inserted central catheter use among general medical inpatients: an observational study using routinely collected data.

Amol A Verma1,2,3, Alexander Kumachev2, Sonam Shah2, Yishan Guo4, Hae Young Jung4, Shail Rawal2,5, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw2,5, Janice L Kwan2,6, Adina Weinerman2,7, Terence Tang2,8, Fahad Razak4,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are among the most commonly used medical devices in hospital. This study sought to determine the appropriateness of inpatient PICC use in general medicine at five academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, based on the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC).
METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of general internal medicine patients discharged between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2015 who received a PICC during hospitalisation. The primary outcomes were the proportions of appropriate and inappropriate inpatient PICC use based on MAGIC recommendations. Hospital administrative data and electronic clinical data were used to determine appropriateness of each PICC placement. Multivariable regression models were fit to explore patient predictors of inappropriate use.
RESULTS: Among 3479 PICC placements, 1848 (53%, 95% CI 51% to 55%) were appropriate, 573 (16%, 95% CI 15% to 18%) were inappropriate and 1058 (30%, 95% CI 29% to 32%) were of uncertain appropriateness. The proportion of appropriate and inappropriate PICCs ranged from 44% to 61% (p<0.001) and 13% to 21% (p<0.001) across hospitals, respectively. The most common reasons for inappropriate PICC use were placement in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (n=500, 14%) and use for fewer than 15 days in patients who are critically ill (n=53), which represented 14% of all PICC placements in the intensive care unit. Patients who were older, female, had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than 0 and more severe illness based on the Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score were more likely to receive an inappropriate PICC.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice recommendations can be operationalised into measurable domains to estimate the appropriateness of PICC insertions using routinely collected hospital data. Inappropriate PICC use was common and varied substantially across hospitals in this study, suggesting that there are important opportunities to improve care. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; hospital medicine; quality measurement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32152091     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  4 in total

1.  Improving peripherally inserted central catheter appropriateness and reducing device-related complications: a quasiexperimental study in 52 Michigan hospitals.

Authors:  Vineet Chopra; Megan O'Malley; Jennifer Horowitz; Qisu Zhang; Elizabeth McLaughlin; Sanjay Saint; Steven J Bernstein; Scott Flanders
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 7.418

2.  Comparing peripherally inserted central catheter-related practices across hospitals with different insertion models: a multisite qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah L Krein; Molly Harrod; Lauren E Weston; Brittani R Garlick; Martha Quinn; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 7.418

3.  Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 16.859

4.  Patterns, appropriateness and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter use in Brazil: a multicentre study of 12 725 catheters.

Authors:  Eneida Rejane Rabelo-Silva; Solange Antonia Lourenço; Rubia Natasha Maestri; Claudia Candido da Luz; Vanderlei Carlos Pupin; Raquel Bauer Cechinel; Eduarda Bordini Ferro; Marco Aurélio Lumertz Saffi; Telma Christina do Campo Silva; Larissa Martins de Andrade; Larissa Fernanda Sales Gomes; Lorena Alves da Gama; Mariana Marques de Araújo; Fábio Rodrigues Ferreira do Espírito Santo; Leticia López Pedraza; Vânia Naomi Hirakata; Vilma Santana Soares; Widlani Sousa Montenegro; Gustavo Rocha Costa de Freitas; Thaís Souza de Jesus; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 7.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.