Literature DB >> 32151881

The importance of processing procedures and threshold values in CT scan segmentation of skeletal elements: An example using the immature os coxa.

Michala K Stock1, Heather M Garvin2, Louise K Corron3, Cortney N Hulse3, Laura E Cirillo3, Alexandra R Klales4, Kerri L Colman5, Kyra E Stull6.   

Abstract

As the accessibility and utility of virtual databases of skeletal collections continues to grow, the impact that scan processing procedures has on the accuracy of data obtained from virtual databases remains relatively unknown. This study quantifies the intra- and inter-observer error generated from varying computed tomography (CT) scan processing protocols, including re-segmentation, incrementally varying thresholding value, and data collectors' selection of the threshold value on a set of virtual subadult pelves. Four observers segmented the subadult ossa coxarum from postmortem CT scans of the fully-fleshed bodies of eleven individuals of varying ages. Segmentation protocol was set, with the exception of each observer selecting their own thresholding value for each scan. The resulting smoothed pelvic surfaces were then compared using deviation analyses. Root mean square error (RMSE), average distance deviation, and maximum deviation distances demonstrated that thresholding values of ∼50 HU (Hounsfield units) are easily tolerated, the surfaces generated are robust to error, and threshold value selection does not systematically vary with user experience. The importance of consistent methodology during segmentation protocol is highlighted here, especially with regards to consistency in both selected thresholding value as well as smoothing protocol, as these variables can affect subsequent measurements of the resultant surfaces.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Amira™; Biological anthropology; Forensic anthropology; Geomagic®; Precision; Subadult; Virtual anthropology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32151881     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  1 in total

1.  A multi-method assessment of 3D printed micromorphological osteological features.

Authors:  Rachael M Carew; Francesco Iacoviello; Carolyn Rando; Robert M Moss; Robert Speller; James French; Ruth M Morgan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.791

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.